Cultural Differences In Shakespeare's Hamlet

Teekasingh 9 which keeps changing summing up the notion of the crossroads and two – dimensional worlds. Thomas’s play also evokes instances of the so called “cross” wherein Hamlet or Eshu states or views themselves as the supreme guide to the cross paths. However, it is significant to understand that although, the play commences with a dream which speaks of the two different crossroads which declares the characters plight and confusion between the different spaces of two worlds. Thomas chooses to highlight that the characters are influenced by the choices evolved due to the colonial practices rather than drawing and welling on any allusions to their current conditions and situations.
Further, it is relevant as well as significant to comprehend

It is noted that Thomas tends to avoid any remarks on the colonial supremacy but also lightly repeats historical past whereby highlighting a visible stance of not only the roots of the disoriented and divided brawl with religion that symbolizes the conqueror’s “aptitude” of Christianity to persons who previously had their different deities or types of Gods, but strives to exhibit the trials to move from holiness to

This is relatively significant since it displays how these ritualistic practices as a part of the cultural practices have grown too the Caribbean territories since it espouses the powerful presence these influences to the social construction, values and most recently the political aspect has had to the entire Trinidadian sphere. The terminology of the “crossroads” that Thomas adapts in his reinterpretation is compared or could be viewed as the crossways between the pre- colonial world and the post – colonial worlds that characters find themselves conflicted in with difficulties of choosing one in particular for guidance. Therefore, it could be summed up that when Thomas uses the character of Shakespearean Hamlet, he does this purposely to elicit any sort of colonial depiction to identify to individuals that The Prince of Denmark is barely a settled

Teekasingh 12 focus, although, the author’s skill in portraying Hamlet in “Hamlet: The Eshu Experience” depicts to an astounding extent that since Eshu symbolizes crossroads, then Hamlet is undoubtedly the one to expose this universe of insecurity as he is a man uncommitted between two contending religious and cultural backgrounds which is a conversant situation to many West Indians. Thomas explicitly illustrates how through his placement of the character Hamlet, the foreign inspiration