ipl-logo

Comparison Of The USAd US Relations During The Cold War

797 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cold war tensions between us and soviet union

Every relationship needs communication and trust in order to keep going in a peaceful manner, every magazine and every TV show tells us that. But what happens when we are talking about a different kind of relation? One that involves powerful partners and in which everybody wants to dominate.What happens when this “relationship” involves partners with trust problems? How do we solve them? How do we keep things going? The relation I am talking about is the one between the Eastern Bloc (the USSR and its allies) and the Western Bloc (the US and its allies) after the end of The Second World War in 1945. The end of the war, unfortunately, did not bring with itself peace and harmony or new hopes for a better future, as one cruel and bloody war ended, another would start as a result of the constantly growing tensions between the Soviets and the Americans. The Western world along with the US thought that the USSR dominance over the eastern part of the Europe is expansionism, while …show more content…

In 1949, USSR exploded an atomic bomb and this aggravated their trust problems. Why? Because both of them were in possession of the most powerful and destructive weapon and both of them were willing to use it in case they felt threatened. (Nicholson, 2002) During the Cold War, it was developed a doctrine called nuclear deterrence, but this doctrine still applies to present contexts which involve nuclear weapons. (Nicholson, 2002) If in the past, leaders were thinking of ways of winning the wars they were involved in, nowadays, world’s leaders are responsible for finding ways of preventing wars, namely nuclear wars, without sacrificing national interests. Today, the chance of a nuclear war erupting is small, but still existent, especially between countries such as India and

Show More
Related
649 Words | 3 Pages

During 1945-1990 the conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States completely dominated the United States’ foreign policy. The United States’ policymakers had to take care of places that were outside American territory, but relevant to the conflict. In order to compete with the Soviet Union after World War II, the US government decided to help the countries which were against Soviet Union. According to Document C, President Truman claimed to support people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or outside pressure.

Read More
1291 Words | 6 Pages

This book talks about when the United States almost started a full nuclear war because of a few soviet missiles flew into the states allegedly. They flew B-47s and B-52s as air fleets for 40 years of this international problem between the Soviet Union and the United States. In the year 1945 America ended World War 2, as the head nuclear power in the world. Even though the U.S. was the nuclear power, they did not have any nuclear bombs. The whole point of this “cold war” was to maintain a peace among uneasy times, which did not work.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

Imagine two superpowers, once allies, now enemies. Weapons of mass destruction; stockpiled, but never used in battle. A war, never fought. From 1945 through 1950, the wartime alliance between the U.S.A. and Soviet Union deteriorated. Several times, during the next four decades, these powers clashed, though never physically.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

This led to the assessment that atomic weapons would have on international politics and how it would affect the establishment of new post-cold war

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

Blake Mcmahon and Adam Lowther look back to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, describe the destruction the bombing had caused, and acknowledge people’s concern regarding the danger of nuclear weapons. They counter the assumption of nuclear danger by asserting that if a country launch nuclear weapons it will spark deadly response from other nations. The nuclear characteristic of deterrent, they argued, is exemplified in the Cold War, in which the United States and the Soviet Union hindered themselves from the brink of war due to the horrific possibility of a nuclear war. Mcmahon and Lowther claim that nuclear weapons are still essential deterrents for the United States against countries that are developing nuclear weapons

Read More
2143 Words | 9 Pages

Nuclear weapons and nuclear war are words that are treated with respect and feared by everyone who speaks them and more importantly feared by those who have them and those who wish to have them. In society when people fear something they want to know more about the subject so they are able to form an educated opinion and understand what they are fearing and learn about the positives and negative consequences. At Trinity College students raised the question of nuclear war, the student body in the 1980’s were clear in their writings that they did not know what to expect with the rising nuclear arms races between the United States and then the then USSR; therefore students were fearful in these rising tensions and the language that was used by

Read More
69 Words | 1 Pages

In todays political climate many countries appear to be on the brink of war. Countries such as the United States, Russia, and North Korea who all have formidable forces of weaponry, are constantly on the verge of a greater warfare by atomic power. Ever since its first test in 1945, the atomic bomb has been considered to be incredibly controversial and dangerous, but also a potential world power changer.

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

The Atomic Age After WWII when America dropped the atomic bomb on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, American officials had encouraged the development of atomic weapons. This will soon lead into the deadly “arms race” of atomic weapons. The Soviet Union will later test an atomic bomb of their own. With this taking place president Truman will give out a response that America will develop a hydrogen bomb or “super bomb.” The results of this will turn into a perilously high stakes when two of the most powerful nations were willing to play nuclear football.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

It sounds a little far-fetched but this was during The Cold War; nuclear tension was at an all-time high between the world’s most powerful

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Instead of ending the tension, their only contributing to the problem. After World War II and Cold War, there was a rise of civilian strategist who started to influence the way policies were being created. These new civilian strategists took it upon themselves to come up with alternatives to prevent nuclear conflict. The reason why these strategists started to critique strategic studies, was after the use

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

As Albert Einstein quoted “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones”. This quote by Albert Einstein tell of the devastation of a nuclear Apocalypse caused by a third world war. In the last century, as modern technology keep on improving in a rapid rate, this so call improve was the cause of 2 deadly world wars. Nuclear weapons bring the possibility of total destruction to a level of mutual annihilation while also altering modern day warfare. Nuclear weapons can accidentally lead to radiation disaster with a massive reach.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Though while the United States are reducing the role of nuclear weapons in its national security, countries such as Russia, who has added 40 new intercontinental nuclear missiles to their arsenal, are increasing it. The presence of rogue nuclear powers such as North Korea and potentially Iran, and growing tensions between nuclear powers, as well as treaty violations, are making the need for nuclear disarmament has

Read More

More about Comparison Of The USAd US Relations During The Cold War

Related Topics

Open Document