ipl-logo

Conflict In Oleanna

1835 Words8 Pages

1. When analyzing a drama, it’s often best practice to break down the play into units. For each act, identify a few key moments that are essential to the story.
Oleanna, written by David Mamet, is a play that looks at a conflict between a university professor, John, and his student, Carol, who makes accusations against him. The only two characters in the play – Carol and John – are both very dynamic as they differentiate more and more from their initial character between the three acts.
In Act 1, Carol appears as an innocent college student, who is looking for help from her professor, John. She does not understand many of the things in his class and is looking for guidance to improve her mark. In response, John comes off as insensitive towards …show more content…

As a university professor, John should have an obligation to supply education to his students in the best way possible, while keeping the student-teacher boundary that exists. Carol tells John that she has trouble understanding his book in which he questions the purpose of education. In an attempt to help Carol, he tells her that people thought that he was stupid as a child. John believes that he can reach Carol on a more personal level by sharing his views and experiences. He hopes that he can create a better relationship with her; in turn, he believes this will further her education. However, this only creates issues for him as she takes it the wrong way. Ultimately, John blatantly states that education is a joke. He thinks of the Tenure Committee as garbage and believes that those who create and take tests are idiots. He clearly states that “[tests] are [one’s] ability to retain and spout back misinformation”. Ultimately, John believes that the systematic build of education is a joke that is no longer valued. However, through his interaction with Carol, it seems that he still holds on to the idea that knowledge is important. He still believes good education is possible; however, he only felt he could do this by reaching a more personal level with his …show more content…

After Act II, it is easier to sympathize with John. This is because it seems that he genuinely wanted to share his beliefs with his student – to create a more personal relationship; however, he did not expect the repercussions that unravelled in Act II and III. For example, when he stated that education is a “joke”, he wanted Carol to have a better understanding of how he looks at the education system. He wanted Carol to understand that education should not be something that an individual worries so much about because it is simply seeing and regurgitating – a concept that Carol was unable to understand. After Act II, it seems that Carol completely misinterpreted John’s intentions, resulting in him possibly losing his tenure because of the fact that she is an incomprehensive student that is not able to grasp certain ideals. Carol is at an advantage of being a woman, and alongside her accusations, she is easily able to take John down. John’s immediate disadvantage of being an educator and saying a few personal and unprofessional things to a student, results in his life – which he worked 20 years for – crashing down around him. Thus, it is easier to sympathize with

Show More
Related
499 Words | 2 Pages

When his wife, Elizabeth, was being questioned by the court for being accused of witchcraft, John reveals his affair with Abigail, the one who accused Elizabeth, “She thinks to dance with me on my wife's grave!” (Act 3) This quote shows Abigail's jealousy and lust, which puts her as a disgrace to the court. This effects John because his reputation becomes destroyed, but he does it to protect his wife because it's the right thing to

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

During the beginning of the play he fails to realize how much he hurt Elizabeth when he committed adultery. John was criticized and treated with a very much deserved cold reception from his wife. But John lacks empathy as he asks her to look sometimes for the goodness in [him], and judge [him] not” (Miller 55). He’s asking her to look past his affair as if this would be an easy task for his committed wife. But however John is able to redeem himself, and change himself for the better.

Read More
1572 Words | 7 Pages

The Crucible – Zaynab Zahra Choose a play in which there is a character important to the theme. Explain how this character effects the understanding of this theme. ‘The Crucible’ by Arthur Miller is a play in which there is a character, John Proctor, who is important to the theme of reputation. Proctor, in the play faces a moral dilemma of whether to confess his sin of his relationship with Abigail Williams, or allow his wife and others accused of witchcraft, to die. Miller uses an allegory in this play, using Salem as a symbol of McCarthyism in 1950s America.

Read More
406 Words | 2 Pages

21). This quote shows the reader about John’s personality and also a little bit about what he looks like, which is hard to do with just dialogue. One stage direction that also helps to develop John’s personality is, “Then he lifts out the ladle and tastes. He is not quite pleased. He reaches to a cupboard, takes a pinch of salt, and drops it into the pot.

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

We must build again.” With John’s optimism to rebuild and learn, his passion to share his knowledge gives hope to bring back the civilization that has been lost to warfare and hate. He says on page 8, “Perhaps in the old days they ate knowledge too fast. “ With this he acknowledges that he will learn from the mistakes evident

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

She wants revenge, and her revenge results in John's tragic downfall. John's affair is not the only flaw that he possesses. John's attempt at saving his reputation is what eventually leads to his demise. He wants to save his reputation and knows the only way to end the turmoil in his community, is to admit to his affair with Abigail. He knows the confession would ruin his good name and end the hysteria in his community.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

For example, John openly discusses his disdain for Parris, expressing the Reverend’s avarice despite his oath of poverty as a clergyman. John is clearly critical of those weighed by hypocrisy, but he himself is such a person. Miller continues his characterization of John saying, “He is a sinner, a sinner not only against the moral fashion of the time, but against his own vision of decent conduct.” (45). The severity of John’s pretense is understood by the reader when his affair with Abigail is revealed.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

She feels like she had a part to play in with the affair. As a result of Elizabeth saying that, John doesn't take it. He gets upset with her and says that she is was never in the wrong, but he was. Elizabeth towards the end of Act IV constantly reinsured him that whatever decisions he makes, she knows that a good man is behind

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

This quote reveals, Elizabeth’s genuine understanding and faithfulness in her husband. She believes that John carries the burden of his own guilt, which is a lucid indication that he has a sense of morality. John feels this guilt, as he recognizes and takes responsibility for the sin he commits, against his wife. Additionally, due to John’s guilty conscience, he also realizes the value and tenderness that his wife brings him. He accepts his misdoings, and never utters a blame against his wife, for his actions.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

John’s name is important to him as he says in Act 4, and he is willing to give it up for his wife and it is worth it. John is honorable because his wife is the most important person in his life, and he would do anything for her. John is a good husband because of his selfless actions toward his wife. John’s portrays honor throughout The Crucible in his loyalty, the good he gives to others and he's a good husband.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

This leaves John feeling unhappy and causes Bernard to make the remark “You’re more like what you were at Malpais,”. Bernards failure to realize how to help John adjust and the parts of him that are unable to change gives the reader better insight as to why John is failing to enjoy his time in

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

In the play Oleanna written by highly esteemed playwright, David Mamet, there is an ongoing dissension between main characters John and Carol. John is Carol’s professor at a highly revered college and Carol comes to John crying out for help to pass his course. Carol goes ballistic in John’s office so John tries to comfort her and offers her a compromise in order to get her grade up, which would involve them meeting a couple times in his office. Carol perceives John’s words and actions the wrong way and goes to the Tenure Committee of the college and files a complaint for sexual assault, which would later turn into a rape charge. I am antagonistic towards Carol in David Mamet’s play, Oleanna, because she distorts the intentions of John’s

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

John is not all innocent, he had his moments of losing temper; however, accusing him of rape was a lie and he does not deserve to be criminally charged. Carol is plotting with her group to destroy his reputation merely because they don’t agree with his point of view. Everyone is entitled to have different opinion, but that does not give anyone the right to start false accusations only to prove a point. The only thing he did was put his arms around her shoulders and she is distorting the story to a very serious accusation. John ultimately looses his composure when Carol says “ don’t call your wife baby.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

People in the Crucible thought he was an honorable man and that no honorable man will ever sin. So when John and Abigail meet each other, Abigail flirts with John, and John say, “No, no, Abby. That’s done with.” So we know he has committed adultery against his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, with Abigail Williams and that gives us a bad image of John sinning and commiting adultery with Abigail and doesn’t really respect his wife.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

The crisis of identity is a very significant turning point in the development in this play. It effectively creates sympathy in the audience through the change in character’s speech style and the act of an “other” in the play conforming to what society demands of him. The first character I would like to bring up is our protagonist, Othello. Being the main protagonist, which most of the play revolves around, a lot of attention is given to him by the audience which makes the crisis of his identity the most significant.

Read More

More about Conflict In Oleanna

Related Topics

Open Document