If giving the chance to invite David Foster Wallace into the discussion about his own essay Consider the Lobster, questions I would ask would pertain to why the widespread background of the history of lobster. Also, about his confusion about any personal ethical system that can truly defend that animals are less morally important than humans. Throughout the essay David Foster Wallace scientifically breaks down where lobsters come from, and what they classified as. He goes along to include the preparation of the lobster and the many different ways it may be served. Both the background of lobster and the preparation of the lobster lead into his questions. However my question to him would have to be why go a full one to two paragraphs in