ipl-logo

Constitution Dbq

790 Words4 Pages

From the failure of the Articles, should the new government, the Constitution, be approved? In 1788, the Constitution was created as the Articles of Confederation wasn’t successful and strong enough for their new government. During that time, a debate went throughout America about the Constitution whether to ratify it or not. Yes, the Constitution should be ratified because a Bill of Rights was promised, no one overpowered (in the government; checks and balances), and it is fair to both citizens and officials. Starting off, a bill of rights was promised which would ensure many things for the citizens. In Document E, it set 10 Amendments such as: “Amendment 1 U.S. citizens have freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.” …show more content…

All branches check up on each other as executive checks on the other two, legislative checks on the other two, and judicial checks on the other two (Document B). For example, judicial checks up on the legislative branch by declaring laws unconstitutional (Document B). All branches make sure they didn’t overpower each other and relied on the other branches. In Document C, the power is separated through three branches that all have different jobs to keep the nation running as there is a congress (ex: approve treaties), a president (ex: conducts foreign policy), and a supreme court (ex: interprets the Constitution and other laws). They all separate powers so one does not have all the power or so much. It is also known as the Separation of …show more content…

As seen in Document A, it compares the Articles and the Constitution. For the executive branch, (the Constitution) had president administrators that enforce federal laws while (the Articles) only takes care when the Congress is not there. For the legislative branch, (the Constitution) a bicameral legislature where each state has equal representation in the Senate and each state has proportional representation in the House of Representatives thus fixing the issue of representation for small and large states. The Articles had a unicameral legislature where each state has one vote no matter what population they had which was unfair for the small states. The Constitution had a national court system that hears different cases while the Articles didn’t have that at all. The two were very different as one was good while the other was bad. The Constitution had more power to serve the nation as one. The two were very different as one was good while the other was bad. The Constitution had more power to serve the nation as one. As said by John Jay in Document G, “Reflect that the [Constitution] comes recommended to you by men and fellow citizens . . . who love their country. At least . . . give the proposed Constitution a fair trial and to mend it as time, occasion, and experience may [require].” This ensure that the new written government is created for the people and will be trailed by the people to see if it is the best they

Show More
Related
599 Words | 3 Pages

Once the American Revolution had ended, America required a new form of government to happen. November of 1777, the Continental Congress accepted the first American Constitution known as the Articles of Confederation. Shortly after the Articles were confirmed by the states in 1781, multiple problems started to arise that provided the United States with an ineffective government from 1781 all the way to 1789. They were not able to address any of the problems dealing with the American Nation due to the lacking features of the government under the Articles. Moreover, the Articles presented each state with too much power that lead to a loose confederation creating a limited power to the central government.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution… An improvement from a government that proved to be ill-conceived. The Articles of Confederation had not worked in the way that the states had hoped. A solution was to be found in the May of 1787 (BE). This solution was the Constitution.

Read More
264 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution came to fruition as an answer for the issues and numerous shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. Not every person concurred with the Constitution or even the said issues emerging from the Articles of Confederation. These people were called Anti-Federalists and their thoughts would not be as effective as the thoughts of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist thought's reflected numerous qualities of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution should have been endorsed with a specific end goal to conjure change and solvethe issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists had the plans to make the country the best is could be, and also sufficiently giving rights to citizens.

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

The issues that precipitated the Constitutional Convention were the fact that “ … the framers sought to create a new government capable of promoting commerce and protecting property from radical state legislatures and populist forces hostile to the interests of the commercial and propertied classes.” The delegates were empowered to revise the Articles to meet the country’s needs, but they took it into their own hands and created an entirely new constitution. In my opinion, the Constitution of 1787 was legitimate in the social sense but was not legitimate by legal standards. The only reason that this new constitution was accepted was because it was what the United States needed at the time so the majority of the citizens agreed upon keeping it.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

The United Sates has operated under two constitutions. The Articles of Confederation was effective in 1781, and The Constitution which replaced the Articles in 1788. These two documents have much in common, but they differ more than they do resemble each other. The primary difference was the Articles of Confederation was an agreement establishing the United States of America as a confederation of sovereign states. Otherwise, the US Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America, also a constitution embodying the relationship of the federal government with the states of America and the citizens of the US.

Read More
190 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitution will fix America and is critical to our safety. The Articles of Confederation are faulty and a stronger new national government is needed in order to be strong enough to protect the people. At the moment, National Government has no money or authority. Giving government power to tax helps us prosper and gives us more protection. Britain is still keeping forts on our land and Spanish will not let us use the Mississippi River.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution was a better choice for the government than the Articles of

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

These four constitutional references and diagrams explained tyranny and the sectioning of power in the government. The first reference by James Madison explained the double security provided by a compound government. It was attached to a document that showed examples of the powers reserved for state, and national government. The second reference, also by James Madison explained the plan for the three branches of government, Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary. The diagram attaches explained the powers that went along with each branch.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitution is better than the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses. The Articles did not give Congress the power to place tariffs on foreign goods, hurting American businesses that could not compete with cheaper British goods. The U.S. government had no chief executive so there was no one to enforce the laws that were passed. The new Constitution addressed many of the problems created by the Articles by creating a federal system of government with a much more powerful national government. The Constitution made a stronger Federal government that could unite the States, taking many of the powers held by the States: the right to tax, the right to raise armies, the right to regulate trade and

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

They hoped to create a better government. The Constitution replaced the Article of Confederation permanently in March 4, 1789. The Constitution created checks and balances between the three branches. It also, established the Bill of Rights, and the first ten amendments of the constitution. The Constitution had to be ratified by at least nine states out of thirteen.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles had many weaknesses so we as americans had to create a stronger government to run our country on. I think the Constitution was a good idea for America because it fixed many of our country’s problems which were from the Articles of Confederation. The constitution gave us a national currency, gave us the bill of rights amendments, and made it so the powers were split equally between three branches. The ratification was good

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first form of government created by the Continental Congress, which developed an alliance between the thirteen states. Congress was a single-chamber legislature which allowed for each state to possess the same amount of authority no matter the size of the community. The Constitution

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

In ¨The Articles of confederation¨ under Article II, ¨Each state shall keep all rights and powers¨. Also ¨The Constitution of the United States of America¨ the ¨Representative must be at least 25 years old and be seven years of Citizen of the U.S.¨. In ¨The Articles of Confederation¨ it doesn´t really talk about Representatives mostly Congress within the articles. Furthermore the efficacy of these two documents is that ¨The Constitution of the United States¨. Is a well resulted documents for the people, it relies on a more perfect union and insures peace within states. It also has a Representative that represents the people of America. Which is stated under section 2 of Article 1, of how Representatives are chosen and how Representatives help the people represent their State. This helps people to have the right to vote over which president they would want to govern their country.

Read More

More about Constitution Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document