Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of the constitution
Pros and cons of the constitution
Pros and cons of the constitution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of the constitution
Pros and cons of the constitution
Pros and cons of the constitution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it state that women are citizens. Women have never been legally declared persons in this country, not by the Founding Fathers, not by the Constitution, not by the Supreme Court. The Fifteenth Amendment guarantees to right to vote to all U.S. citizens, whatever their race, whether they had been born free or born a slave, but it didn’t include women the right to vote. Women fought along for the abolition of slavery. When the battle was won, black men got the right to vote.
1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.
Our government is weak and powerless. We’re the laughing stalk of all the nations, but that can all be change with the Constitution. With the Constitution comes a stronger government, more power for you, the people of America, more rights and protection,
who love their country. At least . . . give the proposed Constitution a fair trial and to mend it as time, occasion, and experience may [require].” This ensure that the new written government is created for the people and will be trailed by the people to see if it is the best they
A constitution is the fundamental law by which a nation or a state is governed and organized. It establishes the framework of government, delegates the powers and duties of governmental bodies, and defines the relationship between the government and their citizens. Texas current constitution was adopted in 1876, and since then Texas voters have approved more than 467 amendments to this document. The word “amendment” is defined as the act or process of changing the words or the meaning of a law or document (constitution). Throughout this essay I will explain the rules for amending the Texas Constitution, the attempts made at constitutional reforms during the 1970s, explain why constitutional reforms were attempted and why it ultimately failed.
There are two distinct sides when it comes to whether or not the Texas constitution should be rewritten. There is the side that favors rewriting the constitution and those who oppose writing a new constitution. Each side has four very strong argument points they like to use when it comes to discussing the Texas Constitution. Those who favor rewriting the constitution say that our current document is unnecessarily long and completely outdated for today’s modern society. This argument holds true when we take into account that “The Texas Constitution is the second longest in the United States”.
The Bill of Rights was passed by congress on September 25, 1789 and was ratified on December 15 , 1791. James Madison and George Manson contributed to the bill rights. In the website, “Bill of Rights Institute,” the “Bill of Rights of The United States of America (1791)” explains the history of the Bill of Rights. At first 17 amendments were agreed on at the house but only 12 out of those 17 were approved. From there , only 10 were passed after being sent to the rest of the states.
As the roaring twenties reached their end the battle against alcohol in the United States is just arising to a turning point. With serious controversy over the Volstead Act the country was greatly divided. There was also the extreme rising occurrences of crime, the creation of gangs and a newly established, unorganized criminal justice system. Prohibition was a disaster across America and the more reforment from the government just made things worse.
Although the ‘New World’ declared independence in 1776, by 1787 the United States of America had yet to agree on a constitution that would satisfy the varying needs of each existing state. One of the major debates was over whether the new legislature would give each state representatives based on that state's population or if each state would have equal representation. The larger states desired more influence with proportional representation, but the smaller ones feared that their views would be encroached on if such a system were put into place. The proposal came from Roger Sherman, a Superior Court Judge of Connecticut, who had previously been a delegate during the independence debates of 1776.
Three distinguished delegates to the Constitutional Convention rejected the idea of signing the Constitution. Edmund Randolph, who had submitted the Virginia Plan, could not extend his approval of the Constitution as formulated because he thought it assigned disproportionate authority to Congress. Therefore, he issued an inquiry to the delegates to present the Constitution to state governments so that they might advise amendments and modifications. Furthermore, George Mason was discouraged by the Convention 's noncompliance to prohibit the slave trade. Mason was also concerned as the Convention 's refused to implement a bill of rights.
These past few years have been some troubling ones. Since the revolution and the ratification of the Articles of Confederation our country has been in a state of limbo. For every step forward our country attempts to make, we end up taking a giant leap back to where we began. Recently, our founding-fathers have taken part in a convention and have began discussing the idea of a new constitution- a new way of structuring our government. This constitution, however, has been lacking in support from some very crucial states due to the lack of a Bill of Rights, which would address the individual rights of a citizen.
The positive effect that brought by the charter of right and freedom During the October crisis the privacy and properties were invaded by the government severely. The rights of the residents were ignored. But thanks to the Charter of Right and Freedom the government can do it no more. The charter stated specific list of residential rights which created positive effects on protecting civilian’s right in Canada The Charter of Right and Freedom protected and promoted the right if the civilians of Canada. The first section of the Charter of Right and Freedom stated “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified
The Constitution is an essential document to not only the American judiciary system, but to American society as well. Though the document’s intended purpose is to protect the people, it has caused much controversy among them. The controversy arises in the argument of how the people should be interpreting the text of the Constitution. Originalists argue the text is meant to be interpreted in the literal sense, instrumentalists oppose this view arguing that the text of the Constitution is meant to be interpreted in relevance to today (adapted to modern times). This argument is discussed by Lawrence B. Solum in parts one and two of, “The Supreme Court in Bondage: Constitutional Stare Decisis, Legal Formalism, and the Future of Unenumerated Rights”.
The constitution of the United States is an insightful and revolutionary idea of how a government should be practiced in order to prevent a greedy, corrupt form of government from establishing and taking over its people. The US government is founded on the principle that it works for its people, meaning that whatever is legislated is meant only for the benefit of the American people. However, the Constitution is at this point flawed due to the fact that many of its proclamations are vague and outdated, and has to be left to interpretation as to what the framers truly intended of it. This is dangerous because it further divides the nation when Americans believe in different forms of what is constitutionally righteous, and this may start a civil
One hundred years after the Constitution was ratified, a political party emerged that threatened to destroy it: the Progressive party. The Progressive party was built upon the idea that the American government is not doing anything to help the country move forward. They believe that there must be moving forward for the “…uplift and betterment of mankind…”(PR pg. 319). They believe that the government of the founding fathers is not keeping up with the rapid changes in society and that it must adapt to the new challenges (PR pg. 333). Although both the progressive party and the founding fathers declare that they want to guard against tyranny and uphold the good of the people, they have different approaches to the issue.