ipl-logo

Constitutional Convention In 1787

420 Words2 Pages

The Constitutional Convention in 1787 was created to provide a strong national government to solve America’s problems and to mainly fix the Articles of Confederation. Both leaders Hamilton and Madison called for this convention to discuss trade issues and create a new government rather than revising the old government. Instead of revising the Articles, there were two discuss plans that were proposed for a new form of government. The first discuss plan was the Virginia Plan written by Edmund Randolph called for a bicameral congressional where the legislature and court chooses a chief executive. This plan made the number of representatives and the states proportional to the population of each state and called for the number of votes received …show more content…

The Anti-Federalists criticized the constitution because it lacked of bill of rights to protect individual rights and made the constitution not approved. Other struggles that they faced were slave-trade. Slave-Trade had many conflicts because the north was against slavery and the south was for slavery. This made both parts of the states divide their regions. Another struggle was the effects of Shay’s Rebellion because it affected the courts in the western part of Massachusetts to shut down so that judges couldn’t confiscate their farmland. The cause of the rebellion caused national leaders to worry about government that could not control rebellions and prevent violence. The struggles that the constitution faced was solved, by starting compromises. The first compromise was the Great Compromise written by Roger Sherman called for a bicameral legislature. This compromise was between small and large states of the colonies and combined the demands that both large and small states needed. The end result of the Great Compromise was that it resolved representation by population in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate as well. The second compromise was the Three-Fifths Compromise that determined how an enslaved person would be counted for taxation and representation. The end result of this compromise was that ⅗ of all population of slaves would be counted for taxation and

Show More
Related
297 Words | 2 Pages

In May 25, 1787, a convention was called in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to express the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. However, the intention from many delegates was to draft a new constitution; create a new government rather than fix the existing one. Rhode Island was the only one of the 13 original states to refuse to send delegates to the Constitutional Convention. At the Convention, the first issues they had to address was the representation in Congress.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

During the Constitutional Convention, in the summer of 1787, several divisions arose among the delegates. There were differences between the northern vs. southern states, merchants vs. farmers, free vs. slave states, large vs. small states, and east vs. west. However, the main division of the Constitutional Convention was the Virginia Plan vs. the New Jersey Plan, essentially the large states vs. small states. The primary objective of the meeting was to somehow find a balance of power without leaving any one group or person with absolute control.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Great Compromise was Roger Sherman’s plan, and was an attempt to resolve the conflicts between the smaller states and larger states, settling the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a bicameral

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

The two plans that were presented was the The Virginia Plan and The New Jersey Plan. The Virginia plan was drafted by James Madison. While he waited for a an appropriate number of delegates to gather at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Virginia plan gave all power to the government. The New Jersey Plan was a proposal to structure the United States Government which was presented by William Paterson also at the Constitutional Convention 1787.

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

Compromise was a huge part of America 's history and was extremely useful when it came to the “Articles of Confederation.” The government was starting to realize the articles weren 't strong enough any more and weren 't helping control the citizens. The government said they needed to be revised so Virginia and New Jersey both made an attempt at fixing them. The Virginia Plan was written May 29,1787 and the New Jersey Plan was written shortly after on June 15, 1787. Both plans were preposals for forms of government and both had many flaws.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

The Great Compromise which was founded at the Constitutional Convention wasn't formed without trouble. Many of the delegates that participated in the convention were wealthy landowners and lawyers, who owned many slaves. They failed to notice the diversity that excited within the nation. As they talked how to repair the Articles of Confederation, issues would arise that would create continuous debates amongst each other. One of the issues that would arise would be the nature of the new government.

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

After deciding to write a new constitution, the delegates could not decide what new form the government should take. One of the options was the Virginia Plan created by Edmund Randolph and James Madison. The plan included a strong government with three branches (the legislative branch, The judicial branch, and the executive branch). In the Virginia Plan, the legislator would consist of two houses and seats would be awarded on the basis of the population. Due to the fact that the seats are awarded based on population, larger states would have more representatives than smaller states.

Read More
211 Words | 1 Pages

The lesson I would pick as the most important to teach to someone in American History is The U.S Constitution. America’s first government document was written on September 17, 1787 by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, lead over by George Washington. What the U.S Constitution did was it set up America’s national government, fundamental laws and it promised to give basic rights for its citizens. At the 1787 convention, delegates came up with an idea to have a more powerful federal government with three branches; executive, legislative and judicial branch with a system of checks and balances to make sure a certain branch did not take too much control over another one or was at the top of the other branches. Also, the

Read More
1897 Words | 8 Pages

What are the Historical Influences of United States Constitution? It is known that people all over the world have come to the United States, to create a better life for their families and themselves. The United States is known for having the best form of government for people to be included and have a say in their beliefs. What many people do not know is, what influenced the United States Constitution and the founding fathers in writing.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

From the articles of 55 to 66, they explained the structure of the outcome that came from the Connecticut Compromise, the House of Representatives and the Senate(Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, 1788 Federalist Paper). It further discussed the election methods, terms of re-election, and their duties. In this section of the articles, the Federalist Papers was mainly add on more details and restrictions onto the conclusion that draw from the Connecticut Compromise, with the legislative structure of the House of Representative and the Senate. The New Jersey Plan along with the Virginia Plan made out the Connecticut Compromise, which had perfected the US Constitution with justice and rights to

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787. There are seven articles and 27 amendments in the Constitution. It helps set up the government by providing the basic law of the body politic. If I could change one thing about the constitution, I would change the second amendment: " Right to keep and bear arms. " It means that people have the right to own and carry weapons; however, when we hear the word "weapons", we will think of guns.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

On September 17, 1787 The Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia came to an end. During the convention there was a debate over whether or not there should be a list of things the government couldn’t do to the states or individuals. The delegates thought back to the declaration of independence and the concept of inalienable rights. George Mason, the author of the Virginia declaration of rights, provided the delegates with two reasons to question the concept of having this list of rights. His first argument was that these rights didn’t come from the governments and he warned that if the delegates listed these inalienable rights, it would suggest that these rights came from the government and thus they could take them away.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

Henry was one of the firsts to come out and publicly oppose the Constitution. He argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the President would become a king. That taxes would be enforced again, and nothing would change from the separation of the British other then than a new face under a crown. In Rhode Island resistance against the Constitution was so strong that civil war almost broke out on July 4, 1788 on because of the issue of federalism to vs. Anti-Federalism (otherwise known as the battle between the yankees to and the loyalists). At the bitter convention of in Massachusetts, letters essays, debates, and conflict arose to product the devise a solution of 5 and assure that five more states ratifying would ratify the Constitution, and work on solutions They also worked to amend the Bill of Rights.

Read More

More about Constitutional Convention In 1787

Related Topics

Open Document