Constructive Thinking Inventory Paper

Introduction For employers it essential to hire the best fit people for their place of work. For employees it is important to understand what their skills are and where they should work. For sides of the employment field it is important to understand the true skill and interest of their employees. It does not make sense for an employer to hire someone based solely on their resume or transcript because that person may not have the interest or ability to think for that job. Because since World War II the topic of testing on one’s abilities, many Psychological tests were created to help in testing for people’s abilities. Constructive Thinking Inventory (CTI) is an intelligence test that is used to determine one’s emotional ability. Though

The CTI was created by Seymour Epstein to overcome other tests that looked at Constructive thinking at the time (Epstein,1998). Construct was defined as, “the influence of thinking on behavior” (Epstein, 1998). One is able to learn in situation based on ideas that they have created in their from previous experiences (Tosun & Karadag, 2008). The CTI is not meant to test a person’s ability to get the questions correct, but to determine how the a person answers them. This determination assists in defining how a person thinks, feels, and reacts in certain situations (Epstein, 1998). According to Epstein, the CTI is a test that decides how “ a person copes with life” (Epstein, 1998). With the way a person answers the various questions, the researcher can tell how the subject will react in real life. CTI is a significant test not because it looks at a form intelligence, but because it is able to evaluate intelligence in a unique form. Most tests look solely at one aspect of intelligence, whereas the CTI looks at much larger number of mental processes (Tosun & Karadag, 2008). Though the CTI doesn’t directly analyze intellectual intelligence, it is still able to predict one’s intelligence (“CTI Scales”). The following essay will give information on the makeup, administrative, and statistics of the

Often times research conducted on Psychological test study how valid or reliable a test is. One of the studies conducted by Spirrison and Gordy to understand the validity of the CTI, specifically tried to understand how basic grammatical errors affect the validity of a test. 73 males and 120 females took part in the study and were given a reading a passage to proofread. A time limit of three minutes was given to them (Spirrison, & Gordy, 1993). The passages were 385 words. It was found that proofreading did not affect any of the 9 scales, but the Naive Optimism and Validity. People who tend to fall under the Naive Optimism scale tend to not focus on problems, and therefore they did not point out the grammatical errors. In terms of Validity, this study showed that grammar errors took away from the Validity of the test (Spirrison, & Gordy, 1993). Taking a step back and looking at the raw test itself and the administration process of it, we can see that the nature of the test adds and takes away from the validity and the reliability. Because the test is completed in such a short time, it decreases for lack of attention span to play a large role in the errors. At the same time, the short time period may also add on to the stress and anxiety of a person, leading to a lack of reliability of the