ipl-logo

Contract Law Case Summary

234 Words1 Pages

I do not believe there is a contract to convey real property between Wilbert Heikkila and David McLaughlin. McLaughlin agreed to buy three parcels of property for $145,000, $32,000 and $175,000. McLaughlin submitted his offer to Heikkila and earnest money checks. However after McLaughlin submitted the written offer to Heikkila, Heikkila changed the selling price of all three parcels, change the closing dates, and added a reservation. When Heikkila made changes to the existing offer this created a counteroffer and the first offer was automatically terminated and new offer was established. “A response by an offeree that contains terms and conditions different from or in addition to those of the offer. A counteroffer terminates the previous offer” (Cheeseman 2013). The mirror image rule states the “offeree must accept the terms as stated in the offer.” (Cheeseman 2013) “Minnesota has followed the `mirror image rule ' in analyzing acceptance of …show more content…

Under that rule, `an acceptance must be coextensive with the offer and may not introduce additional terms or conditions.” (McLaughlin v. Heikkila 2005) The offeree in this case McLaughlin did not sign, or write an acceptance letter to the counteroffer Hekkila

Show More
Related

Case Ten Associates V Mccutchen Fla

1265 Words | 6 Pages

The violation of statutory provisions by a landlord can qualify as a proximate cause for injuries to tenants in the case the surrounding environment was insecure and there was clear knowledge of intrusions into the given residential area. Ten Associates v. McCutchen Fla. App., 398 So.2d 860 (Fla.App. Ct. 1981). The landlord was legally obligated to positively respond to the plight of the tenants as their lease agreement put him responsible for any required repairs within the common area. The tenants, including Parker, had made numerous attempts to inform him of increased frequency of intrusion due to a broken deadbolt lock that he was mandated, according to the provisions of the statute, to promptly repair.

Read More

A Brief Summary Of A Civil Action

396 Words | 2 Pages

In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case began when a group of various parents and families believed that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause, he realized that 2 corporations sat at the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and file a major lawsuit which stated that the the two corporations, Grace and Beatrice, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste. The plaintiff side of this case then begins to collect scientific evidence and witness statements in order to prove that both Grace and Beatrice were

Read More

Jennings V. Ssm Health Care Case Summary

1212 Words | 5 Pages

The court back up their reasoning by explaining that in a written contract it “is presumed to be "the final memorial of the parties' agreement” and that the clause in the contract must be followed to complete Jennings’ side of the contract. The court agreed with

Read More

Mini Tort Research Paper

507 Words | 3 Pages

If you were recently in a car accident, and your vehicle sustained damage, you may be able to recover some of the repair or deductible costs that you paid via Michigan 's mini-tort process. Here are four things you need to understand before you pursue a mini-tort claim following a vehicle accident in the state of Michigan. Mini-Tort Law Is Designed For Vehicle Damage Michigan 's mini-tort law is specifically designed to assist you in recovering repair and deductible costs to your vehicle. It is not designed to recover costs associated with damaged personal property in your vehicle or with medical costs this process is specifically designed to assist you with recovering money you paid for vehicle damage. Mini-Tort Law Is Limited

Read More

Complainant's Case Summary

492 Words | 2 Pages

Complainant alleges that he was subjected to different terms and conditions because of his race when Respondent refused to reinstate him as Battalion Chief and allow him to drive. Respondent asserts that Complainant is still undergoing medical treatment for a partially detached retina and had not reached his maximum medical improvement with his left eye. Respondent also asserts that Complainant can perform firefighter/EMT “emergency medical technician” activities with the exception of emergency response driving, which is an essential function of the position of a Battalion Chief/EMT in the Bureau of Operations. The investigation uncovered that Complainant, as of June 2015, was still undergoing treatment for his partially detached retina.

Read More

Court Case Summary

650 Words | 3 Pages

Court proceeding and judgment change eventually with time. Every case that is heard within the court system might potentially alter court proceedings that follow. The courts up hold the law and make sure that the defense and prosecution abide by it for a clear judgment. After reading Case No. 09-3133 REGINALD MEEKS v. DAVID MCKUNE, and Case No. 05-5049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONRAD DOMINIC POOLE, law that protect the defendant are up held in court if there is reason to believe an error in conviction has occurred. If applying to appeal to the court’s decision and it’s valid it will be heard.

Read More

Plessy Vs Kraemer

567 Words | 3 Pages

At last, the circuit courts declined to enforce the agreement on the basis that not all the property owners had signed the original

Read More

The Application Of Contract Law In Canada And France

137 Words | 1 Pages

Many countries over the years have adopted different was to enforce law. Countries like Canada and France uses different forms of legal tradition, which are common and civil tradition. These law encompasses during different eras, for instance common law tradition was derived from England during the time of the Middle ages, which was applied within British colonies. The civil tradition was utilized throughout continental Europe during the empowerment of Spain and Portugal. Common law is based on precedent and civil law use a comprehensive system.

Read More

Criminal Justice Case Summary

725 Words | 3 Pages

1. Is the Court correct? Explain your reasoning The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the lower courts approval of the drug checkpoint saying, “the checkpoint contravened the Fourth Amendment” (Cornell University Law School LII, 2000). The United States Supreme Court affirmed that decision stating that the, “checkpoint program was indistinguishable from a general interest crime control” (Cornell University Law School LII, 2000) that violated the Fourth Amendment.

Read More

Uniform Commercial Code Essay

451 Words | 2 Pages

Terms which the communications of the parties concur or which are generally put forward in a writing expected by the parties as a last expression of their agreement regarding such terms as are incorporated in that may not be denied by confirmation of any former declaration or of a coexisting oral understanding yet may be clarified or supplemented. (https://www.law.cornell.edu) Additionally, necessities put forward in Section 2-201 must first be fulfilled if the agreement as adjusted is inside of its stipulations. Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code. A case of this segment can be Fairway Mach.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In The Declaration Of Independence

432 Words | 2 Pages

By saying this, the authors show they have tried to set agreed terms with

Read More

Leonard Vs Pepsico Case Summary

198 Words | 1 Pages

It was a pleasure reading your response to the Leonard v PepsiCo case. I agree with you on your discussion. According to Melvin Sean, “In order for an offer to have legal effect, the offeror must have an objective intent to contract when making the offer. Generally, the offerer must have a serious intention to become bound by the offer and the terms of the offer must be reasonably certain. (The Legal Environment of Business: A Managerial Approach: Theory to Practice, p 131)

Read More

Bullard House: Negotiation

912 Words | 4 Pages

In this negotiation, the Bullard Houses are being sold and the buyer and seller negotiated the terms of a potential sale. In this negotiation, the interests of both parties were incompatible.

Read More

Contract Law Vs Tort Law

1353 Words | 6 Pages

Contract law versus tort law Contract law is guidelines that represent contractual agreement between persons or dealers. An agreement is essentially an understanding between parties outlining their responsibility to each other. Contracts can be formed for any sort of collaboration. In this way, contract laws may address different transaction for the sale of good and services. Contract laws outline what a person can or cannot include in an agreement, and what the remedies are if a party breaks their contractual duties.

Read More

Case Study: Marten Vs. Whale

134 Words | 1 Pages

But it is mandatory that the real seller should have the authority to sell the goods. If he does not, the person taking possession from him will not get a good title.

Read More

More about Contract Law Case Summary

Open Document