ipl-logo

Contract Law: Misrepresentation In Law

1790 Words8 Pages

ISSUE The issue here is if there has been a misrepresentation made in the contract between Mr Smith and Mr Jones. LAW A contract is a legally binding or valid agreement between two parties. The law will consider a contract to be valid if the agreement contains all of the following elements: offer and acceptance; an intention between the parties to create binding relations; consideration to be paid for the promise made; legal capacity of the parties to act; genuine consent of the parties; and legality of the agreement. Statements made over the course of negotiation could amount to either a contractual term, or a misrepresentation. If the statement amounts to a term in the contract, and it is not fulfilled, the innocent party can then sue for …show more content…

The requirements for an actionable misrepresentation are that; the misrepresentation must be a statement of existing fact or past events, and not a statement of opinion; it must induce a person to enter into the contract; it must be material in that it relates to a matter which would influence a reasonable person’s decision whether to enter into the contract. (Misrepresentation Act, Cap 390) There are three types of misrepresentation: The first is innocent misrepresentation - when the representor had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her false statement was true. The second is negligent misrepresentation - a representation made carelessly or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth. The third is fraudulent misrepresentation - where a false representation has been made knowingly, or without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to its truth. The affect of a finding of misrepresentation, regardless of whether it is innocent, negligent or fraudulent, is that the contract is voidable, and the innocent party may rescind the contract, which generally means terminating the contract and returning the parties to the position they were before the …show more content…

However, a statement of opinion which is made by a person in a better position to know the truth will constitute a false statement of fact because of the implication that the maker knows of facts to justify his opinion. (Smith v Land & House Property Corporation [1884]) In this case, Mr Smith, as the owner, is implied to know the annual revenue of the café he owns. As such, Mr Jones is able to escape from the contract, by rescinding it. The effects of rescission is that the café will revert back to Mr Smith’s ownership, and the payment made for the café be returned to Mr Jones. In addition, should he wish to, should fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation be proved under the Misrepresentation Act (s2.1), Mr Jones can sue Mr Smith for damages. (Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson [1991] )The damages Mr Jones can sue for under fraudulent misrepresentation is greater than the damages under negligent misrepresentation. Should innocent misrepresentation be proved, Mr Jones cannot sue for damages, but he will still be able to escape the contract by rescinding it. In addition, he can file an action for indemnities. (RBC Properties v Defu Furniture

Show More
Related
334 Words | 2 Pages

Further, an essential element of constructive fraud is that defendants sought to benefit themselves in the transaction. Put simply, a plaintiff must show (1) the existence of a fiduciary duty, and (2) a breach of that duty.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

The trial court held for Zapatha. Dairy mart appealed. In Zapatha v Dairy Mart, 381 Mass. 284; N.E. 2d. 1370 there are two issues at hand. 1) Does the unconscionability of an agreement depend on whether at the time of execution the contract provision at issue could result in unfair surprise and was oppressive to the allegedly disadvantaged party; and 2) Whether a merchant seeking to terminate a business agreement must act in good faith by practicing honesty in fact and observing reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in that trade.

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

Argument Summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cecil v. Cardinal Drilling Co., 244 Mont. 405, 409, 797 P.2d 232, 234 (1990); Mont. R. Civ. P. 56(c). A material fact involves the elements of the cause of action or defenses at issue to an extent that necessitates resolution of the issue by a trier of fact. Arnold v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, 2004 MT 284, ¶ 15, 323 Mont. 295, 100 P.3d 137.

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

He also rationalized his fraudulent activities by hiding the customer’s late payment in order to be benefitted himself, but said that he was helping people more than he was helping himself. 2. Given that Mr. Pavlo’s fraud was restricted to an accounts receivable embezzlement scheme, what symptoms might auditors observe?

Read More
252 Words | 2 Pages

In the present case, the relationship purportedly forming the basis for the constructive fraud claim was formed in a professional setting and is

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Kern has in the ruling of the case. It is known to the court that J. Kern holds a small number of shares of the Fabulous Inn property. This gives him financial disadvantage if he would rule in favor of Bebe as it would disadvantage the Fabulous Inn, where the incident happened. The court has the obligation to be impartial, if there is reasonable ground to doubt a person’s impartiality, the decisional authority cannot participate in the process.

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Unfortunately, the contract is not in line with this good intention and fails to ensure the

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

The court held that the mutual mistake about the cow's fertility did not make the contract void, as it was an essential term of the agreement. The court stated that the contract was binding and enforceable because the parties had agreed to take the risk of the cow's condition, even if mistaken (Admin & Admin, 2020). The decision in Sherwood v. Walker-Smith Co. had a significant impact on contract law by establishing the principle that a mutual mistake of fact, even if material, does not necessarily make a contract voidable. Instead, the court emphasized that the parties' intentions, as expressed in the contract, should be respected (Admin & Admin,

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

As such, there is sufficient evidence to establish that Mr Grande has stated something to WorkCover and to a registered person. iii. The person knows is false or misleading in a material particular 1. Three direct witnesses have been called upon by the Prosecution to give oral evidence to establish that Mr Grande knew the statement he was giving, was false and misleading. The Prosecution called Mr Frederick Palmer, who is accused of grabbing Mr Grande, to recall his version of events.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, but the limitation of remedies clause was useless because the clause failed its essential purpose the log cabin still leaked and the parts were defective therefore Justus Homes did not fully restore the log cabin to the way it was promised. 3. Was the essential purpose of the limitation of remedy to protect the party benefiting from it – here, the seller of the log home kit – or was the essential purpose of the limitation of remedy, as the court said, “effective enjoyment of implied and expressed

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The court sided with Drennan that there was no need for consideration to make a promise binding under an unilateral contract. Court also ruled that if there is a mistake that Drennan must know about mistake however, Drennan did not know and had no reason to believe that the bid submitted by Star Paving was a mistake. Star Paving failed to alleviate damages cause and that their argument was meritless (CaseBriefSummary.com, 2013). Court ruled that Star Paving did not present evidence that their bid was binding in exchange for Drennan use. The Trial Court awarded Drennan 3,817$ in damages.

Read More
152 Words | 1 Pages

In Dick Bentley Productions Ltd. v Harold Smith Motors Ltd 1965, the plantiff purchased a car from the defendant under the representation that the car only had been driven 20,000 miles. The representations about the car made by Harold Smith Motors are similar to those made by Green Haven Pty Ltd regarding the quality of the air, which both later proven to be false. In both cases, the representations made were not written into the physical contract. Judges in this case use the prima facie assumption rule to determine that the representation made by Harold Smith Motors was stated as a fact, and was therefore a warranty in the contract. Using objective tests, the representation was made with the intention of inducing the buyer and was in close

Read More
1644 Words | 7 Pages

A condition is a critical term and without it the whole agreement would be different and breach of it allows for the innocent party to reject the contact and sue for damages (Posussard v Spiers & Pond) . While warranties are terms of less significance in the contract and a breach of these allows the innocent party to claim for damages only (Bettini v Gye) . The outcomes of breach of innominate terms are not certain and depends on the consequences of the breach. Implied

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

A minor contract is voidable at the minor’s choosing. Phillip Weaver had to have known that Kim Young was a minor, and should had contracted safely with her. The cosigning of one of Kim Young’s adult parents would

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

By saying this, the authors show they have tried to set agreed terms with

Read More

More about Contract Law: Misrepresentation In Law

Open Document