ipl-logo

Deepen Steinberg Contractarianism

2509 Words11 Pages

Chapter 1 Deepening Steinberg’s Argument through contractarian perspective Introduction Steingberg (2009:1069) in his response to Lang and Scott (2009) argued that the committee delegates in the WTO are primarily representatives of their states, and therefore they primarily push their agenda in the informal discussions. He claimed that influence of these ‘technocrats’ demonstrated by Lang and Scott is over-exaggerated. In his description of the US representative to the Service Council, he argued that the representative is both an ‘American’ as well as a ‘global manager’, but first and foremost he or she is an American. Steinberg described these delegates as mere figureheads of national higher-level politicians. This Chapter argues that …show more content…

He argues that rationality and reasonableness emphaise different aspects of human nature. Rationality emphasizes the passive side of human nature, our capacity to be pleased and satisfied. In the weighting system it is usually the one that has the highest ranking and best utility. On the other hand, reasonableness emphasizes the active side of our human nature; our own capacity for control and constraint. The absolute constraint remains unaffected by individuals’ preferences and tests. Wong summarises this dichotomy, as the former is more concerned about the notion of good, while the later is more concerned about the notion of right. It is beyond the scope of this paper to go further in depth of the contractarian discussions, but the dichotomy between good and right is at the heart of the a variety of discourses in global governance. The weighting technique employed by Hobbes has been the major methodology of variety of landmark …show more content…

Rousseau and Rawls belong to this tradition since both of them emphasise that the social contract not only defines principles of ‘right’, but also represent the fundamental good of people. The distinctive feature of hybrid contractarianism is a dual assumption that reasonableness and rationality are both aspects of a practical reason. Accordingly the analytical method consists of two techniques. The rational perspective uses the weighting model to rank preferences of people. Meanwhile, the reasonable perspective uses the testing model to assess the justifiability of people’s actions. This approach has been advocated by Brink who proposes that dualism of practical reason consists of the categorical imperative and the categorical prudence. Elster built on this dual understanding of practical reason and argued that the two aspects are independent. Accordingly, he argued that a good life is a life in which rationality and impartiality are harmonious with each other. Rawls in a hybrid contractarian tradition adopted a similar position as he argued that the conception of rationality and reasonableness must have equal status in practical reason. Freeman commented on Rawls’ writing that ‘there are two ideal perspectives in Rawls conception of justice: the original position and the deliberative

Show More
Related

John Rawls Philosophy

901 Words | 4 Pages

I will talk about John Rawls’ philosophy and two major critiques made to his work by G.A. Cohen John Rawls was born in Baltimore in 1921. He was always concerned about poverty in the United States and wanted to change the society he lived in. He wrote his most famous book A Theory of Justice in 1971. This book is considered the most important book in American philosophy after the World War II. John Rawls philosophy is based on his vision of justice.

Read More

Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

689 Words | 3 Pages

[3]In a thought experiment proposed by philosopher John Rawls, individuals are asked to imagine designing a just society under a veil of ignorance, a concept urging people to prioritize fairness and equality since they can't predict whether their social structures will advantage or disadvantage them. Similarly, [4]Dr. King stresses a fair and harmonious society in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," except that he focuses on solving existing problems rather than creating a whole new society. The most fundamental difference between Dr. King and John Rawls is that Dr. King confronts a real problem that exists in a real society. In contrast, John Rawls only proposes a theoretical solution.

Read More

Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis

1790 Words | 8 Pages

Rawls was not happy whit the original arguments about what makes a social institution just. The utilitariam argument says that societies should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number. This argument has many problems, excpecially that it seems to be consistant with the belief of majorities over minorities. The institution argument holds that human intuit what is wright or wrong by some innate moral sense. Rawls attempts to provide a good account of social justice through the social contract approach.

Read More

Mills Vs Rousseau Analysis

927 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the past month, we have read and discussed both The Social Contract by Jean-Jaques Rousseau and The Racial Contract by Charles Mills’. As I said before, the two philosophers derive from very opposing backgrounds, their literary works theorize vital agreements between the members of a society that unite them for the overall benefit of its citizens. Each philosopher addresses the elements and ideas, but Charles Mills’ tackles the elephant in the room involving the issue of race. Because of his ability to see the need for this unspoken issue to be incorporated, I believe that Mills' Racial Contract is more persuasive. Both Rousseau's Social Contract and Mills' Racial Contract are inferred agreements that are existent throughout

Read More

Comparing Kant's 'Jim And The Indians' Dilemma

999 Words | 4 Pages

To choose the better way of making a decision, we must understand the fundamental principles involved and to compare the advantages and disadvantages provided by Kant and Bentham’s theories. This makes up the body of this essay. Both Bentham’s Hedonistic Calculus and Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative provides people with a moral structure, to make moral decisions. However, both of them have benefits and flaws, they contradict each other in many ways therefore making

Read More

The Life And Legacy Of Robert Gould Shaw

775 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

Read More

Hobbes Vs Rawls Analysis

1591 Words | 7 Pages

Political theorists, whether they are realists, or liberalists, over the centuries, have come into conflict over what they believe to be the utmost important task of the state. Hobbes believes the most important task of the state is to ensure law and order, rooting his argument in the idea of a sovereign ruler. On the other hand, Rawls, a modern theorist, firmly believes that a state should focus on realising justice within their society. While a utopian society cannot be achieved by either of these theories, I will highlight why Rawls was right in his assumption that the main focus of a state should be to ensure justice for all within their nation, through analysing and comparing the conflicting arguments of Hobbes and Rawls.

Read More

John Rawls Vs Nozick

568 Words | 3 Pages

John Rawls and Robert Nozick are well known as the most eminent political philosophers of the U.S in the late twentieth century. Both of them have had their views of justice and are reviewed and explained as follows: Rawls did a work in 1971 and was about A Theory of Justice. This was his major work that he did, and it greatly assisted to shape a social justice concept, which is social democratic and liberal. He provided a theory that represented an alternative to utilitarianism.

Read More

Thomas Hobbes, By John Locke, And Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1114 Words | 5 Pages

Benjamin Kielhold Phil-220 Prompt 3 John Rawls was a twentieth century philosopher who authored a thought provoking book known as, A Theory of Justice. He was heavily influenced by past philosopher’s such as: Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, for motivation and ideas for his beliefs while modeling this theory. The basis of his theory is the concept of equality and freedom directly clashing. Rawls argues strongly of two general principles for his theory of justice that help structure the world that we live in. He uses these principles coupled with a veil of ignorance to imagine how the rules of society should be structured in a fair and non-biased manner.

Read More

Analyzing Rawls Two Concepts Of Rules

1102 Words | 5 Pages

In Rawls’ paper, “Two Concepts of Rules”, he sheds light on fact that a distinction between justifying a practice and actions that fall under said practice, must be made. This distinction, according to Rawls is crucial in the debate between Utilitarianism and Retributivism, more specifically in defending the Utilitarian view against common criticisms, which will be addressed further in this essay. This essay will be examining the troubling moral question that Rawls addresses; The subject of punishment, in the sense of attaching legal penalties to the violation of legal rules. Rawls acknowledges that most people hold the view that punishing, in broad terms, is an acceptable institution. However, there are difficulties involved with accepting

Read More

Rawls Argument Against Exceptionalism

1209 Words | 5 Pages

The relativist side argues that community itself is that which generates the conception of justice, while the universalist side emphasizes the inherent value of community. Among the latter, two prominent proposers are Michael Sandel and Johnny Taylor, who respectively challenge the idea of a self as prior to its ends (i.e. the liberal notion of autonomy), and the notion that an anti-perfectionist state follows from a commitment to individual liberty. Both raise a significant challenge to liberalism, specifically to its Kantian basis. This has been answered in a variety of ways, most significantly through Rawls’ reformulation of his theory in “Political Liberalism,” which was a strong basis for the pragmatic response that Stephen Macedo elucidates to the limits of community and social values. Throughout the paper, I will present the various reasonings of these thinkers, in addition to engaging critically both with the arguments themselves and on the validity of the responses that the liberal school

Read More

Immanuel Kant's On Perpetual Peace

1152 Words | 5 Pages

Human nature has progress in time from the barbarian to civilized mankind, from undemocratic to be more liberal and democratic. The civilization of human nature growth matured into a more structured values, culture and norms, institutions, system and rule of law to govern the domestic and international relation of states. The idea of a democratic state does not go to war has become a very influential theory among liberalist scholars. ‘On Perpetual Peace’ - Democratic peace theory (DPT) introduced by Immanuel Kant in 1795’. Democracy in general represent a form of government in which people choose leaders through electoral process.

Read More

Comparing Kant's Theory And Ethical Analysis

827 Words | 4 Pages

All that matters in the making of a decision is the purpose behind it and not the consequences that follow. For a decision to ascribe to Kant’s theory, the thinking behind it cannot depend on circumstance: it must have the capability of being universalized without destroying society. Kant believed that it is our duty to preserve life at any cost and that moral decisions cannot be guided by our emotions but by ‘reasoned duty’. He claims that if humans use reasoned duty to get to an ethical conclusion that is acceptable, only then can they perform this reasoned duty. (Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals).

Read More

Social Justice Theory

759 Words | 4 Pages

However, their approaches are different thus creating more conflict between theories. Rawls proposes that a veil of ignorance is the ideal way to make proper decisions. The veil of ignorance is, in essence, a group of people would walk into a room with no knowledge of who they were, what their gender or sexuality was, where and how they grew up, what their ethnicity was, or what their beliefs were. They would then be presented with a pressing social issue like what just solution will allow the three men to equally see over the wall. Theoretically, the veil of ignorance would be an effective way to eliminate all personal bias.

Read More

Conservatism: John Rawls A Theory Of Justice

2136 Words | 9 Pages

chronological list John Rawls, (1921-2002) Conservatism | Liberalism | New Century Rawls 's late works dealt with the issue of stability: whether to stand firm regulated by the two principles of justice? His answer to this question is contained in a collection of lectures Political Liberalism (Political Liberalism). The Rals introduced the idea of pervasive consensus, agreement on the basis of justice as well as good relations between citizens of different religious and philosophical views on the world (ie, different notions of good). In the same section introduced the term public reason - ways of reasoning common to all citizens. Rawls 's A Theory of Justice (Theory of Justice 1971)

Read More

More about Deepen Steinberg Contractarianism

Related Topics

Open Document