Controversy In Fahrenheit 451

The Key Controversy Dwelling Beneath Our Literary Education

Books are a principle staple mark in a child's social and academic development. They furnish the foundation for an adolescent's inspiration and curiosity to be constructed. In America's modern day curriculum though, countless immature students are being enforced to read a series of novels that promote profane and violent content, one being the popularized Fahrenheit 451. Positioned in the 24th century, Fahrenheit 451 apprises the reader about the principal protagonist, Guy Montag. Early within the novel, Montag gains gratification in his profession as a fireman, burning illegally possessed books and homes of their owners. As the novel advances though, Montag begins to question his

This rigorous study directly states that utilizing a vulgar method of communication in society could lead to a depletion of trust within the speaker. Throughout the stretch of Fahrenheit 451, students are revealed to terms such as "damn" and "hell" on numerous unnecessary occasions. Observing the novel's vulgar insouciant language could influence students to communicate in an immoral fashion, potentially destructing their reliance and trustworthiness in the social world. Consequently, countless quantities of students have factually developed intolerable forms of behavior that is directly correlated to a long term utilization of profanity. In 2011, Brigham Young University professor, Sarah M. Coyne, hypothesized and concluded that "profanity use is associated with more-hostile personalities, as well as other forms of aggression" (Coyne). This disquisition promptly vocalizes that aggressive behavior among adolescents is directly associated with long term profanity usage. Coyne wasn't the only researcher to attack this topic. Brad J. Bushman, an Ohio State University physiologist , discovered that "students have encoded new and more aggressive scripts, schemas, and beliefs through the use of profanity" (Bushamn). Not only are students developing more hostile behaviors, their overall tone and speech are critically altered as well. Drawing from these college studies, it is apparent that long term utilization of

Salem State University professor, Yvonne M. Vissing, recorded in a study that "3,346 American parents with a child under 18 living at home found that 63% reported one or more instances of verbal aggression, such as swearing" (Vissing). This dissertation promptly states that an immense portion of American parents were reported authorizing their children utilizing profanity. It is conspicuous that parents who exploit this method of discipline emerged utilizing profane wording as a branch of communication. While some individuals might not perceive this as an issue, copious amounts of adolescents have woefully fell victim to this immoral form of discipline. Lizette Borreli, a writer for the "Medicaldaily", reported in an article that "teens who were screamed or cursed at by 13 years old were found to suffer more depressive symptoms between ages 13 and 14 than students who were not disciplined this way" (Borreli). This review directly states that adolescents who were instructed within a profane method of discipline possess a higher risk of depressive symptoms than those who were not. Therefore, analyzing Fahrenheit 451 could presumably have a critical impact on an adolescent's destined parenting