ipl-logo

Criminal Liability: Salmmon Vs. Salomon, & Co.

1596 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Theories of corporate criminal liabilty

E CRIMINAL LIABILITY 3.0 INTRODUCTION
A corporation is not a natural person and only acts through its officers; if what the officers did is criminal in nature, then only the corporation is liable to be prosecuted. Corporations, as legal persons, gain many benefits similar to natural persons but they continue to be able to hide behind complex corporate structures to evade the liability of natural persons under the criminal law. Corporations continue to cause severe injury to individuals, groups and the natural environment through their actions. Their ability to abuse power and evade criminal liability reveals their current privileged position in comparison to individuals.
Corporate criminal liability started with non-feasance offences and …show more content…

This is despite the fact that the locus classicus decision in Salomon v. Salomon & Co., which says that a corporation upon incorporation assumes a legal personality and status in law separate from that of its members, can be regarded as the foundation of corporate criminal liability generally. This is because it is when the corporation is treated as a person in law, that it becomes a recipient of rights and bearer of duties. The capacity to sue and be sued therefore is one of the effects of incorporation. None of these corporations has been sued for their negligence and recklessness which resulted in the death of …show more content…

Most definitions of crime emphasize that one crucial and distinguishing characteristics of crime is that it may be followed by punishment. Therefore, no person including a corporation may be held criminally liable, unless the act complained of is defined as an offence, and the punishment is stated.
Crimes can be divided into two categories and the essential elements of an actus reus depend on which of these two species of crime one is dealing with. First, there are crimes known as conduct crimes where the external elements required are the prohibited conduct itself. Thus the actus reus of the offence of reckless driving is simply driving a motor vehicle on the road’ no harm, no consequence of that reckless driving need be established. The second species of crime is known as result crime where the external element of the offence requires proof that the conduct caused a prohibited result or consequence.

3.2 INGREDIENTS THAT CONSTITUTE CRIME
Crime can be defined as an illegal act or activity that can be punished by law. But if the definition of any particular crime is examined carefully, it will be seen that it always consists of two sorts of elements-physical and

Show More
Related
1195 Words | 5 Pages

One of the reasons many of these big businesses got away with their robber baronistic ways was the

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

In other words, the knowledge that a corporate agent is intentionally breaking the law (Food Drug and Cosmetic Act) is acknowledging full responsibility for his/her actions. Dotterweich's small drug company repackaging other drug manufactures products showed how directions to do so originated from corporate (Dotterweich). By this, Dotterweich was subject to prima facie evidence that warrants guilt and findings whereas Park's case failed to have a causal link to the intent to mislead or

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

For several years, the law has treated corporations as metaphysical persons. This means that the law regards corporations as persons, but only for certain legal purposes. For example, corporations have some of the same rights as natural people do, such as the right to freedom of speech. Corporate personhood has evolved into a highly controversial topic since it was first established in the famous supreme court case, Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad. This was a case where the Southern Pacific Railroad protested taxes placed on it by several counties in California.

Read More
1587 Words | 7 Pages

In order for a person to be found guilty of a crime, two elements must be present which are the actus reus (guilty act) and the mens rea (guilty mind). The first part of this essay seeks to consider the liability for homicide offences and also assess whether Jason, Welch, Ellis and Stevens have any potential defences based on the crimes they committed. P360 Will Jason be held liable for the death of pinky? Pinky suffered harm from Jason’s act, in a situation like this, we would need to look at s. 18, s. 20 and s. 47 of the offences against the person act 1861.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

There are laws and regulations that corporations are to follow and they know what they are doing before they are caught. They have the best attorneys at their defense, there punishment of having to repay back millions tarnishes their image, and people lose confidence and do not

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The film “The Corporation” is about corporate America and how it shaped our world today. A corporation is a company or group of people authorized as a single entity and recognized in law. The idea of corporations started hundreds of years ago. Corporations are now much different in today’s world than they were when they started. Corporations are now identified by the law as a person.

Read More
204 Words | 1 Pages

In chapter 1, Pfohl analyzes laws, and in turn, deviance is decided by the supposed ‘winners’ in the battle to control deviant acts. The winners are seen as the people who are seen as good and normal, while the losers are stuck in having to do what the winners want so they do not become outcasts or deemed deviant. In one takes into consideration that the winners are the state the losers would be going against the state when committing acts that are considered deviant by the winners or in this case the state. Mundie comes to similar conclusions in many of the definitions of crime explained in his writings. Definition four states that crime is an ‘injury of the state’, under this definition crimes are socially harmful, which means that crime

Read More
1246 Words | 5 Pages

This is at any cost no matter what illegal, monstrous behaviors they engage in while at work, or how charming they are in their everyday lives outside of work they as humans have morals which they should carry with them to their jobs creating a corporation based on excellent morals verses one that has all the defining characteristics of a psychopath. The government is also responsible for the actions of psychopathic corporation because they do not mandate punishments severe enough causing the corporations to follow the rules and regulations allowing for little to no punishment for cases of corporate

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Lubitz, by German prosecutors. The article notes that under German law, only individuals, not companies, can be prosecuted. In the United States, corporations are viewed as a “legal person,” which opens them up to criminal prosecution in the form of corporate liability. However, since German law does not view corporations in this way, the prosecutors are limited in the scope of their investigation.

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

166) Harms that can be caused by corporations include corporate fraud such as pension frauds, harms caused by working like death, injury and disease, exposedness to airborne pollutants and food poisoning. Hillyard and Tombs (2007) state that applying a concept of crime to corporate harm is not compatible, on the grounds that administrative entities cannot be reduced to actions, motivations and objectives of an individual human representative who composes them. Hence, the zemiological approach might be more accurate to comprise mass harms caused by corporations (p. 19-20). For the study of global crime and insecurity this would mean that if the zemiological approach would be applied, a particular focus would be placed on collective and corporate responsibility.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The contaminated water supply then resulted in the death of little children, and parents had to bury their own children. Therefore, there is no reason not to have prosecuted the two corporations as all the elements of negligence are displayed here. Consequently, both corporations whether it was intentional or accidental, committed an act of negligence. Although nothing can be done to undo the losses, both companies must have apologized and compensated the damages

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

AMAZON’S CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Most major companies have embraced the power of CSR to drive brand affinity while also effecting tangible positive social and environmental impact, but some corporations remain conspicuously absent from the CSR landscape. Amazon.com, dubbed by its own hometown as a "corporate scrooge," is one of those companies notably turning a blind eye to demands for CSR. But now, the online retail giant may be changing its tune. There were four pillars to Amazon’s CSR:- •Economic responsibilities - As a foundation companies are responsible to produce goods and services in a profitable matter. In addition companies create jobs and create career opportunities.

Read More
1181 Words | 5 Pages

Corporate Manslaughter refers to the decisions undertaken by a company that went wrong either in regards to their execution or due to the existence of some inherent fault or loophole in the decision making and its subsequent execution, resulting in or causing death of a person or persons. A company exists only in the contemplation of the law and thus cannot put behind bars in lieu of punishment hence, what can be imposed on the company is not imprisonment and fine only Justice Lindley has described the jurisprudential essence of the term company as follows, “A company is an association of persons, these persons contribute money or money’s worth to a common stock” .The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is called as

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

Kenneth Lay, Mr. Jeffrey Skilling and the company CFO, Mr. Andrew Fastow .The management level of Enron Corporation had misconduct the code of ethics and fail to performing the duties of a corporation which is telling the truth of the situation of a corporation .Instead , they tried try to hide the truth of their financial status and create a false prosperity situation and make the public believe on them in order to support their shares prices . The misconduct of code of ethics by the management level by Enron corporation has led to the another question – The ultimate responsibility of a corporation towards society ? The ultimate responsibility of a corporation is to gain profit or become a stable economic unit ?

Read More
2318 Words | 10 Pages

Introduction This question requires for an understanding on the rules and principles relating to criminal liability for an omission. As well as whether the rules and principles are too restrictive on individual freedom. In order to have an understanding of the rules and principles of omissions, one first must understand how criminal liability is imposed. For a person to be found guilty of a crime they must have both the mens rea and actus reus of the committed crime.

Read More

More about Criminal Liability: Salmmon Vs. Salomon, & Co.

Related Topics

Open Document