ipl-logo

Courtroom Workgroup Case Study

672 Words3 Pages

The differing personalities between the two courts has an impact on the courtroom workgroup ethic. Both proceedings displayed the effectiveness of the workgroups and how each interacts differently. In felony courts, “court actors” improve the effectiveness of the courtroom. Attorneys and judges that work with each other on a regular basis foster improved relations. As a result, cases have a higher probability of resulting in a plea and the length of disposition is decreased (Metcalfe 2016). Judge Stevens’s courtroom displayed such interactions. In the case of The State of Texas v. Manuel Gonzalez Barajas. No. 334409, the attorney for Mr. Barajas, Dustin Galmor, failed to promptly inform his client of his trial date. The defense attorney spoke …show more content…

Galmor brought up issues with requested documents. Judge Stevens, in hopes of protecting the “establishment of justice,” discussed the solution with all attorneys. He dictated the conversation. Directing each attorney to acknowledge each issue. While Judge Stevens controlled the workgroup, Judge Holmes merely listened and responded to the workgroup around him (The State of Texas v. Kayla Chvone Marshall. No. 315716.). In considering Mrs. Marshall’s sentencing guidelines, Judge Holmes enlisted the courtroom actors to assist him in making his decision (Judge Stevens did not ask for assistance). Personality of the Felony Court hinges on the idea of control and retribution. Judge Stevens, although technically a part of the workgroup, controls the effects of the actors. While the Misdemeanor Court works along with the workgroups to ensure change or rehabilitation. Judge Holmes even explained that County Court number two is a “people’s court” and “this is your court [to make changes]” (Judge Terrence L. Holmes, personal communication, November 15, 2017, Jefferson County Court at Law number two). The dynamic of each Court is unique to the level of jurisdiction. With each jurisdiction, different workgroup ethics emerge (as well as

Show More
Related
1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

In fact the Supreme Court of Illinois established the Commission on Professionalism to promote among lawyers and judge of Illinois principles of integrity, professionalism and civility: to foster commitment to the elimination of bias and divisiveness within the legal and judicial system; and to ensure that those systems provide equitable, effective and efficient resolution of problems and disputes for the people of Illinois. (Rule 799(a). Then going out in the real world seeing it happen, first hand. All I can say is I have been an apart of this great Commission for seven year and we have a lot of work to

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Lincoln was practicing in a court of law; he was not trying to convince a group of individuals of Truett’s innocence at a local pub. Emotion alone, while helpful in the courtroom in some regards such as closing and opening statements and proving certain elements such a genuine fear of loss of life, possibly would not have handed Lincoln a victory. His ability to “zealously represent” his client was due to his preparation long before he stepped into a courtroom. A large part of this preparation is the construction of elements taught in this class: case briefs and legal memorandums. These devices help an attorney understand the interconnected fibers between statutes and common law as they apply to a case at hand.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

CSU Long Beach, Political Science Department at Long Beach Municipal and Superior Court, Long Beach CA Legal Apprentice and Researcher 1996-1997 • Conducted political research on the public defender system and provided analysis by viewing, discussing and summarizing judicial procedure(s) and Trial Judge, District Attorney, Public Defender to gain a better understanding of the efficacy of the public defender system on criminal proceedings in Long Beach and its need for key structural improvement. Accomplishments: After reading Gideon’s Trumpet as a context by which to explore and analyze the public defenders system and the social injustices that often occur, as reference by the main characters denial of his legal right to receive legal counsel in his defense in a Florida court; I related my reading and first hand experiences, observations and findings on the efficacy or lack thereof of the Public Defenders system to supervising professors at the CSU Long Beach, Department of Political Science in an attempt to suggest needed improvements to the criminal justice and judicial system. CSU Long Beach, Office of Affirmative Action - Long Beach,

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

1. According to the case law of Illinois v Allen, the US supreme court held that “trial judges confronted with disruptive, contumacious, and stubbornly defiant defendant must be given sufficient discretion to meet the circumstances of each case. The court further observed that at least three constitutionally acceptable avenues exist for dealing with a defiant defendant, in the case of Ms. Roberts she was a very defiant defendant. The avenues are 1.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Linda Greenhouse advocates for the need to maintain an active and informed civil dialogue with the court. She believes that the citizens of the United States are entitled to hold the Court to a set of performance standards. At the most basic level she believes it is the Court responsibility to speak to the public clearly in a way they would understand. Greenhouse understands that there is a specialized language in any legal opinion, but she feels that an education citizen should be able to understand the Courts decisions. Greenhouse describes the American citizenry as “the consumers of the Courts work….seems…

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

Lawyers also decide what is relevant in court, rather than letting parties decide what they believe to be relevant. Because of this, victims lose participation in their own case. Christie also discusses the types of segmentation and their effects on modern law. I agree with Christie’s views of modern law in regards to reduced participation of parties, the presence of too many specialists, and his view on segmentation. I agree with

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

For example, the parole and supervised release committee must take into consideration the victims opinion when considering a offenders release, thus limiting the boards ability to use it’s discretion on what they may be a more appropriate release date. The goals of the victim-witness program could also potentially limit the prosecutions ability to prosecute the offender for a longer sentence. For example, a victim could potentially want to forgive the offender for the harm they have been cause, therefore, seeking for a more lenient sentence then the prosecution may be seeking, thus constricting the prosecutions

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

What is courtroom workgroup A courtroom workgroup is an unofficial arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, defense attorney and the judicial officer. The system was designed by James Eisenstein and Herbert, to observe the ways courts especially lower level courts finalize their decisions. The same group of courthouse regulars gather in the same courtroom in which they sit or stand in the same place and perform the same tasks ever day. The only difference in which they face each day is different names of the victim, witnesses, and defendants.

Read More
1460 Words | 6 Pages

Courtroom environment

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

Members of the court have some differences but some try working towards helping

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

There are six basic elements of each perspective on justice. There is the crime control perspective, which stresses the control of menacing offenders and the protection of society, and calls for severe punishments. The rehabilitation perspective focuses on assisting and caring for people who are unable to manage themselves. Another perspective is the due process perspective, which provides the basic rights of a defendant and meets requirements needed for a fair trial. There is also the nonintervention perspective, which focuses on the least intrusive treatment possible.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

The defendant is not guilty, but somebody in this courtroom is" (Harper 203). This

Read More

More about Courtroom Workgroup Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document