ipl-logo

Courtroom Workgroup Paper

609 Words3 Pages

What is courtroom workgroup
A courtroom workgroup is an unofficial arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, defense attorney and the judicial officer. The system was designed by James Eisenstein and Herbert, to observe the ways courts especially lower level courts finalize their decisions. The same group of courthouse regulars gather in the same courtroom in which they sit or stand in the same place and perform the same tasks ever day. The only difference in which they face each day is different names of the victim, witnesses, and defendants. The types of defendants and the environment of the crimes they are accused of remain constant. There are also additional members of this court family who also take an important role in the system. This …show more content…

The persecutor plays an active role in the investigation of all crimes, the arrest of a suspect, the persecution of the suspect, the termination of parole or probation and senesce received following a conviction. Persecutors have limitless choice in some of the most critical matters and they must consider they are held in high standards. Most of the work being done is held outside the public eye. They have a duty to peruse justice nut operate in an opposed rather than truth-seeking way.
Defense attorney
On the other hand the main supporter for an accused person is a defense attorney. Thie attorney will act on behalf of their client to the best of their ability. In which could be form advising the defendant in discussing what the best course of action should be to ensuring their rights are not violated. Also, the defense attorney is there to explain every step of the legal process being conducted. For instance, if a defendant is found guilty, the defense attorney takes action by preparing for sentencing and offers justifying circumstances to the sentencing judge. If there was a case where the defendant has a history of mental illness or never committed a crime and it’s their first time, in most cases the defense attorney makes these cases for a lighter

Show More
Related
887 Words | 4 Pages

To do this, they used various pieces of evidence and testimonies to convince the jury of their argument. The jury then decided whether or not Arias was guilty based on the claims of counsels, defense and prosecution. The judge was there to maintain order in the courtroom, negotiate between the counsels, and decide guilt, known as administrator, negotiator, and adjudicator respectively. Once Arias was convicted, the role then moves to correction. They are responsible for enforcing the punishment and incarceration that she was sentenced to.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

When a person has been charged with a crime, it's after the police have conducted an investigation. There are many times when the investigation has caused the police to arrest the wrong individual. The accused has the right to have their own investigation conducted by professional detectives working for the defense. Defense attorneys can have their own in-house criminal defense investigator to find facts and evidence that will proclaim their clients' innocence. (-- removed HTML --) Associate Degree Criminal Justice (-- removed HTML --)

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

The defendant gets read and explained to about their charge. If the defendant calls for a lawyer, the judge establishes one. The people in the courtroom, like witnesses try to provide evidence to support the side they are on. (How court works). People question if blacks are discriminated in courts like they were in the 1930’s, but our court systems today are way different and more fair now.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The defense attorney communicates with defendant about plea-bargaining, and assistance the defendant receives the correct plea-bargaining. The prosecutor is an individual who represents the government in a criminal or civil

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

According to the American Bar Association, the prosecutor is an administrator of justice and advocate. In the Casey Anthony trial the prosecutor had enough evidence to charge Casey Anthony as First-Degree murder. The false statements from Casey Anthony, the investigations from law enforcement, and every evidence presented pointed out that Casey Anthony killed her daughter. The prosecutor used “forensic evidence that they say shows Anthony kept the body of her daughter, Caylee Anthony, in the trunk of her car” (Treffers, Burgess, & Burgess, 2013). Another theory was that Casey Anthony put duct tape in Caylee mouth, and suffocate her.

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

The differing personalities between the two courts has an impact on the courtroom workgroup ethic. Both proceedings displayed the effectiveness of the workgroups and how each interacts differently. In felony courts, “court actors” improve the effectiveness of the courtroom. Attorneys and judges that work with each other on a regular basis foster improved relations. As a result, cases have a higher probability of resulting in a plea and the length of disposition is decreased (Metcalfe 2016).

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.

Read More
1460 Words | 6 Pages

Courtroom environment

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

A non-unified court system would allow judges to have the power to deal whatever sentence or punishment they wanted. In the courtroom next to them they could have the same issue going

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

The judge takes a more active role in helping police prepare evidence, directly questions witnesses and is central to determining the guilt or innocence of the accused. Unlike an adversarial system, there is no trial by a jury of an accused’s peers in an inquisitorial system. To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the adversarial system, it

Read More
294 Words | 2 Pages

In a trial a defendant is represented typically by a barrister or solicitor that can appear in a court and many defendants that do not have enough money to afford a lawyer normally represent themselves. During the trial if the defendant pleads not guilty the jury is sworn on the case and the prosecution will make an opening speech introducing the case to the jury’s present in the court. The prosecution will make a speech about the evidence they gathered that is linked with the defendant. The defence team have the right to question the evidence the prosecution team have against the defendant. The defence witnesses give evidence and this evidence is crossed checked by the Prosecution team.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

This attempts to ensure that there are no major holes when the judge declares what the relevant law is and no major holes in the evidence presented to the jury/fact-finders. Criminal defense lawyers have different ways of dealing with this moral dilemma internally; some will never ask their client whether they committed the crime, others will act on the basis that they are keeping the judicial process fair (e.g. right to a fair trial) and promoting the ideals of law, and some will take the view that 'someone has to do it'. Criminal defense lawyers often are seen in the same light as those who they represent, they face criticism from much of society for defending people who are 'obvious criminals'. Depending on jurisdiction, they are usually paid significantly less than civil litigators because they receive legal aid (government funding) rather than private remuneration. They also have high levels of substance abuse, presumably related to the role that they play in the judicial system and the pressures they face (media criticism, their performance helps determine one's freedom as opposed to a civil case which relates more to monetary

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

Paul, the evidence from the DA’s office, the doctors, members of the Children's Institute International (CII) and clients. He had to work together with them to defend his case. This was shown when a plea bargain was offered to Ms. MaMartin. 2. How significant was discretion with respect to the defense attorney?

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Justice may sometimes be cruel and harsh, in being so, however, it is universal for each and every one of us and we defend our rights in the name of it. When certain violations of justice occur individual entities are charged with different cases for which they are called up on a trial. For everyone to get a fair trial, there are some aspects to the law that need to be respected. The likes are: the phenomena of the “due process”, questioning the credibility of the witnesses and the role of advocates' persistency when defending their clients. All of these, together with a great deal of other principals, have to be there for justice to be done to the whole society.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

The judge was very observant with the defendants and at times had a good sense of humor. He would often ask the defendants why they did what they did, and if they had ever thought about the position they were in, and what this might do to their children. The judge was very understanding and reasoned with most defendants. He wanted to get a sense of what the defendant was thinking, and often gave good advice to those he felt deserved it. He appeared very relaxed and at

Read More

More about Courtroom Workgroup Paper

Related Topics

Open Document