Crafters Of 1787

What was the process involved in crafting the Constitution of 1787? The United States Constitution is a testament to the law. That was supposed to be the vision of a more perfect union. Which started with the Constitutional Convention of 1787. These were the blueprints for governance that would profoundly shape the future of a nation. This paper will argue that the crafters of the Constitution of 1787 needed to contend with multiple complicated issues. The crafters of the 1787 Constitution were faced with a mass of complex issues. Their challenge was not only to create a document that reflected the ideals of democracy and governance, but also to devise a system that could endure the test of time and adapt to future challenges. An example of

They could not regard it as a valid contract.” Thus, Garrison viewed the constitution as a social contract that represented the intentions of both the framers and the adopters. However, they believed that this contract excluded black people and was initially designed to protect slavery. Many saw the Constitution as both a violation of natural rights and natural law, and because of these violations, many did not consider the Constitution to be a valid contract. Which was a big issue that the crafters dealt with. Another example of slavery that piggybacks off of the example prior also deals with the compromises that the framers had to deal with, which was either known as the three-fifths compromise or the three-fifths cause, which was part of the Constitution that basically stated that enslaved people would be represented as three-fifths of a person for tax purposes. It was supposed to help settle the disagreements between the states on how they should count enslaved individuals. (Lawson 1997, 293, 297) Another major issue that the crafters dealt with was economic, political, and the amount of power they could give the central

It focused on the importance of limited power and checks and balances in order to have a functioning democracy. Otherwise, meaning that without these principles, the constitution would lose its initial meaning. (Sheffer 1991, 471) The final example that further examines the many issues that the crafters dealt with is “The provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form; they are organic, living institutions transplanted from English soil. The significance is vital, not formal; it is to be gathered not simply by taking the words and a dictionary, but by considering their origin and the line of their growth.” This example means that the Constitution is not just a set of inflexible rules, but rather a dynamic and evolving system. The true meaning isn’t found within the words and definitions of the Constitution, but in the understanding of its historical context and how it has further developed over