Like many other attitudes and behaviors, we acquire in life, we can also learn how to be a willing participant in criminal behavior by being taught to do so. A child learns by observing others that they are in direct contact with and then imitate what they have observed, which carries on into adulthood. Of course, there are several environmental factors that can play into whether an individual learns to be a criminal or not, and those can boil down to where they live, how their family environment is, who they grow up around, their parents’ job or lack thereof, etc. Based off the text, Elijah Anderson’s The Code of the Street, criminal behavior is learned through this code that spells out how criminal behavior is learned, what it entails, how it is executed, and how it is passed down from family to …show more content…
That to me seems to be limiting the theory by only focusing on one race group, stating that only poor, black areas are where the code exists and operates. Though it does mention the stigma of race, using the terms “ghetto” and “street kids” is insinuating that all areas where black people living in poor areas are crime ridden areas. Another weakness is the part where “decent families” are discussed. According to the text, decent families and street families live in the same area but live by a vastly different set of values and rules. It’s a very black and white theory where families are either “street” or “decent”. That doesn’t give any room for exceptions or any shades of grey, which seems to be exclusionary. What about the “decent” families who are non-violent but break the law out of necessity? Since they’re included in the working poor, they might need to resort to stealing in order to