Culture Beliefs And Practices Use To Adapt One Another In Past

1079 Words5 Pages

The Strategies of Culture Beliefs and Practices Use to Adapt One Another In Past
Culture is the characteristic of group of people defined by everything such as language, religion, lifestyle etc. Different people in different societies have different culture but they also have some similarities. The culture is differing from things such as clothes, foods, religion and many others. Culture is the identity of a group of people living in specific place; they have their own sketch of life what the culture says they follow that. We have seen that a lot of people do some specific thing they first thought about their culture, what my culture says on this occasion. Especially on the occasion of wedding and some other celebrating days they follow strictly …show more content…

These responses are considered the correct way to feel, think, and act, and are passed on to the new members through immersion and teaching. Culture is not always determines what is acceptable or unacceptable. It encompasses all learned and shared, beliefs, knowledge, norms, an values, as well as attitudes, behavior, dress, and language. In past people are trying to figuring out their cultures and norms from environment or from a people. The Salem witch trials of 1692 took place in Salem, Massachusetts. Overall, 141 people were arrested as 19 were hanged and one person crushed to death. Researchers describe the Salem witch trials as a series of court trials that were aimed at prosecuting persons who had been accused of witchcraft. The trials took place between 1692 and 1693 Prior hearings of the Salem witch trials were carried out in several different towns. The major trial was conducted by the Court of Oyer and Terminer situated in Salem town. Several people were rounded up and charged with witchcraft. Some of those arrested died in prison. Of the accused, 14 women and 5 men were hanged. There were fears about religious extremists as many critics …show more content…

Young divides his work into two parts. The first details the life of George Robert Twelves Hewes. Hewes is a shoemaker by trade and important to Fabian for the class struggle that he sees as a determining factor on the memory of the tea party. Young weaves Hewes’ life from two separate biographies. One was written by James Hawkes the other by Benjamin Bussey Thatcher. Both biographers interviewed Hewes in his old age. Both stories are told as completely as they can from Hewes’ own recollection. Hewes recalls taking an active role in the Boston Tea Party. This face is confirmed by Young’s research. Hewes also recalls working on the same chest of tea as John Hancock, a well-known man about Boston. Young claims that given the nature of the event and the desire for the perpetrators to remain anonymous that it is highly unlikely that someone of Hancock’s status and position within society would have been an active part on board. This one memory, however, forms the crux of Young’s interpretation of Hewes’ history, and the importance of memory, even if that specific memory is flawed, or untrue. At that instant, real or imagines, George Hewes became an equal of John Hancock. The two men who were separated by class, occupation, wealth and status, were working together in the cause of liberty, they had become associates. That