Critique Of Darwin's Theory Of Natural Selection

975 Words4 Pages

1.According to Rice et al (2008:56) the rational that directed Darwin to his theory of natural selection pass on calming like this: all species are able of bring into being more offspring than their food wealth can sustain. Biological variation occurs in all species, and this variation is inherited. There are more those born than there is food to sustain them, there is rivalry between individuals for provisions. Some individuals have differences that are positive for survival, such as additional speed to outflow predators, fight to disease upright vision to locate food resources. These people are more likely to live longer life and produce more offspring than those who have dissimilarities less positive to long life and offspring production. Scupin (2012:22) in the theory of natural selection Darwin and Wallace emphasized the massive difference that is present in all plant and animal species
Darwin’s theory says that man look as if left alone in the world without any heavenly power which could protect him when Darwin’s followers become conscious that man is no more or no less that “ naked ape”, they decided that such close resemblances between man and the rest of the animal world destroyed any purpose of human purpose existence other than that which all animals have. Darwin’s theory …show more content…

Darwin theory of evolution fascinated not only to well-known scientists, such as the biologist Thomas Henry Huxley, the botanist Joseph Dalton Hooker, the anthropologist and eugenicist Francis Galton, but also to novelists and poets. As a result, many Victorian writers dramatically changed their opinions about man’s origins and the bodily aspect of man’s