Real During the 1990s, David Foster Wallace wrote various, interpretive essays that represented narratives in a collection titled A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again. The main essay, titled as the collection, was a thoughtful reflection of Wallace’s experience on Nadir, his first extravagant cruise. The hundred page range of the essay gives way to Wallace’s verbose quality, illustrating his commitment to recap his past experiences accompanied with in-depth analyses. Wallace’s other essays in the collection emits a similar style, with detailed descriptions of his experiences and perceptions of the world. Not all works carry those story-like qualities, but are structured as more of literary analyses presented by fluid writing. Through all of the words and subjects he writes …show more content…
Initially written as a review of H. L. Hix’s Morte dAuthor: An Autopsy, Greatly Exaggerated discusses about Hix’s thesis that questions the importance of an author’s entity to the understanding of a text. There is a loss in significance for Wallace’s roles of a writer and analyst if we believe that there were no motives behind his writing. Wallace’s character entity could have been used as a way to rebel the former narrative, post-modern styles of writing, but it also seems as if Wallace was analyzing someone else’s experiences. Wallace believes that, “it is really critical readers who decide and thus determine what a piece of writing means (139),” which means that each person must consciously and actively attempt to look for genuine experiences for themselves instead of accepting what other people think they should be believing. It is ironic how Wallace argues that we should live for ourselves and not question our experiences because of other people, but that element seems to run through most of his essays. Ultimately, the conclusion that comes forth from Wallace’s writing and statements is to not experience life as he illustrated