Compare and contrast
David Suzuki has become one of Canada’s most renowned environmentalists, and his quantitative and detailed writing style has been a valuable asset in raising awareness on issues surrounding climate change and a more sustainable environment. Given Suzuki’s expertise, it is not surprising that he has many essays on these topics, including “ Forests Are Another Piece of the Global Warming Puzzle” and “ Does Selling off our Resources make us an Energy Superpower?” which, although sharing an author, make persuasive arguments in two separate ways. Where the first focuses on forestry, the latter focuses mainly on mining, the more scientific approach taken by the first essay compared to the more socio-political approach of the second, as well as the solution based approach of the first and problems based approach of the second, and again the more narrow view of the forests
…show more content…
Suzuki’s essay on Forests is far more focused on hope, and giving reason to support our change to a more environmentally conscious society.Due to the new findings on the amount of carbon that is housed in forests, he presents their economic value not in being cut down, and therefore releasing carbon into the atmosphere too early, but in being left to grow, and acting as a buffer. He even points out the other aesthetic benefits of forests that we often take for granted, and would sorely miss, if we continue to scorn all the warnings. His other essay regarding mining is a little more of a depressing read. His tendencies in this essay veer more towards issues political in nature to philosophical . He repeatedly laments on the world's failure to act upon the science, to see the problems coming, and do something to prevent it. His seeming frustration in this essay seems to be in steep contrast with the other rather buoyant form of his essay on