The attitudes of Christianity and Islam towards merchants and trade are different from one another in the beginning stages, but as time progress each moderate their earlier views. In the beginning Christians found it unfit to be a rich merchant, while Islam’s judgment on trade was acceptable as long as they were honest and the trading was just. As time went by over a couple hundred years, the followers if each belief changed their views on trade, though it was acceptable, merchants were expected to trade geniuses. In the beginning Christians found it unfit to be a rich merchant, while Islam’s judgment on trade was acceptable as long as they were honest and the trading was just. To sell a product for true value or to sell it for a profit has always been a debate. In Document 4 by Thomas Aquino, a leading Scholastic Theologian depicts how …show more content…
In Document 6, Letters to and from Italian merchants in the fourteen-century depicts, In the letters there were full of request and acceptance of trade contract. In this time, Italy was a Christian country right next to the papal state. As stated in letter C, from the fact that the letter was from England and that sea trade was going on in the name of god and profit, you would have us buy Cotswold wool, In letter B, we could also know that merchant families are very proud of themselves of being merchants. While during the same time in Islam merchant’s status in society was declining, as show from a quote Iban Khaldun, a Muslim scholar from Document five, thought trading lead to “decrease and weakening in virtue and manliness.” In Document 7, an Islamic court decision, Ankara, seventeenth century but representative of Turkish guild practices in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries conveys how the Muslims began to limit the action of merchants put putting moral values on them and criticizing them for nit distributing equality among