ipl-logo

Dbq Essay Examples

755 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Salient features of the American system of federalism

Political concerns arose because of different beliefs in government structure. The federalist, for instance supported a republic way of government in order to reduce faction. In Document A from the Federalist Papers for example, James Madison explains how because men have different opinions and wealth, having rival parties is almost inevitable. In order to solve this a large republic form of government is an ideal choice, according to him, because there’s a larger representatives and it will be harder for candid The federalists believed that with elite leaders, they would not need to worry about tyranny. In addition, they wanted a separation of powers among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches in which the division of powers …show more content…

They believed that the state should hold the major power to protect everyone’s rights and by putting more power on the executive branch and weakening the states, the antifederalists believed that there will be potential abuses from the government such as absolute ruling. In document G which is from the Antifederalist papers, “Brutus,” explains the senate as part of the Aristocratical part and the Executive branch as the monarchial branch. He believes that the Supreme Court can interpret the constitution as to how they would like it to mean and will cause the government to be modified to a structure that they please. This might cause the depletion and validity of the legislation and the judiciary branches. In addition, putting great power on any men can cause the people to be oppressed. The purpose of this document was to make sure that more powerful checks be placed so that anybody of power does not abuse its …show more content…

This rebellion began because of the need for paper money and tax relief. In Document B, from the Federalists Paper, Hamilton explains how the government should have a general power of taxation. It is necessary because without taxation, the government is unable to support national forces and the expense of troops and military arrangements and operations. In addition, Hamilton also includes how it’s either that people pays taxes as a way to fulfill public needs or the nation has to diminish due to the increase in debt. To the Antifederalist however, taxes were considered a threat for them because the national government can levy the taxes whenever they want and was another form of the oppression from the British parliament. The audience of this document is the antifederalists who were concerned that the government was going to be oppressive and be unreasonable with taxes. Another concern that arose was that Hamilton also wanted to create a national bank and during that time only a few were present in which they were located in Boston, Philadelphia, and New York only. He hoped the bank will provide loans and currency to businesses and a safe place to deposit money as well. This national government would be charted by the federal government and be controlled by directors in which 1/5th of them would be appointed by the government as

Show More
Related
281 Words | 2 Pages

1. How does the Whiskey Rebellion parallel the American Revolution? Firstly, the Whiskey Rebellion was the culmination of a lengthy rural protest against Hamilton’s hard money policy. This protest occurred in 1794 by Western Pennsylvania Farmers and grain distillers who objected to a high federal tax on the whiskey they produced. The western Pennsylvania farmers attacked officials and tarred and feathered a man charged with collecting the Whiskey tax, there by resulting to closed courts, blocked roads and organized mass protests.

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

What took place in Massachusetts during the years 1786 through 1787 shocked many. Shays’ Rebellion is directly linked to the high taxes and call for debt collection imposed by the government after the American Revolution (Danver 207). A group of newly settled farmers lead by a veteran of the Revolution, Daniel Shays, band together in hopes of changing the future; in hopes of living in a world without the economic injustices they were facing. It even wound up getting the attention of George Washington who stated that the rebellion played an integral role in his decision to attend the Philadelphia Convention (Danver 215). In a letter addressed to General Henry Knox, George Washington expressed his complete and utter shock regarding the recent uprising.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

In George Washington’s Farewell Address (1796), the departing president warned that the creation of political factions, would most certainly lead to “formal and permanent despotism” for the United States, of which he was clearly right. Despite Washington’s words of warning, two of his closest advisors, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, helped to form the factions that led to the dual party system under which the U.S. operates today. Hamilton and Jefferson came to represent the divisions that shaped the early national political landscape, for they had polar opposite views on how the Constitution of the United States should allow, and support, their vision of how the government should be run. Jefferson took a strong position against the creation of a large, central federal government that got itself involved in domestic affairs. According to Jefferson, the role of government should be small and more direct to local citizens, in order to keep the new republic from returning to a tyrannical monarchy.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

Second, Hamilton’s financial plan said that the nation needed to combine the debt between the southern and northern states to get rid of all of the war debt. The southern states disliked this a lot and were very angry that that they had to pay off the debt of the north after they already payed of all the debt of their own. The southern states also pointed out that this plan should not be accepted by Washington because it was unconstitutional and was not stated in the constitution. Lastly, George Washington had to made a decision if he agreed with Alexander Hamilton to set up a National Bank. Once again, this was Thomas Jefferson vs Alexander Hamilton.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

as well as the states, which were very separate from each other in many aspects, so with the creation of a national bank Hamilton sought to address all these issues. The way Hamilton planned to do this was by assuming having the national bank assume the debt of all the states, resolve the concerns over fiat currency that was issued by the continental congress and raising money. So, by doing this Hamilton was not only getting the states to feel invested in the government, but also the speculators since they needed the government to pay off the bonds that were issued, and by paying the money owed to foreign creditors, the U.S. would start becoming a reliable partner; in other words, yes, the national bank was essential, a necessity to the well-being of the

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

Were the Ojibwe after Confederation were they united or divided? Ramjot 8A Many groups were not unified after Confederation and I believe the Ojibwa was one of those groups that were divided instead of united. First of all, the French gave them alcohol in exchange for furs and got them into bad drinking habits, which also affected their health in bad ways.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

This is very effective because it prevents one branch from getting too much power and becoming a

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution The Articles of Confederation was an archetype constitution that created a nation of independent states only loosely connected together by a single congress. The founding fathers deliberately designed a nation with a very feeble central government. There was no judicial branch, no executive branch, there was no coining money, and there was no president. These were all intrinsic weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation that were entrusted to the states, weaknesses that would soon cause another rebellion. It was a confederation rather than a strong union, so in a sense we were playing with the other states on the team

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Alirio da Rocha January 25th, 2015 Federalists vs Anti- Federalists Period 5 Federalists v Anti-Federalists The battle between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party went around the ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists did not favor the Constitution, all they wanted was change to the Article of Confederation. The Federalists wern't very aggressive, but their goal was to make a constitution that was fair.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

20182600 During the 1800’s the US went through government changes. In 1776 the Declaration of Independence was approved, in 1777 the Articles of Confederation were adopted, and in 1787 the Constitution was signed. With each new change America improved more, but problems still occurred. America was gaining immigrants which was forcing Americans westward towards the Indians which caused tension issues among the immigrants and the natives.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

They believed that this government could provide the stability and security against violent outrages. The foil of these people were the Antifederalist. The Antifederalists offered three objections: that the Congress had conspired under a “veil of mystery” to create a new form of government, that a strong national government would destroy states’ rights, and that the new system of government resembled and monarchy and that violated the principle of liberty that guided the American Revolution. They also pointed that the voters will not directly

Read More
1689 Words | 7 Pages

The Founding Fathers thought that there should be a division of the powers so this way no one would have all of the power. If this would happen, we would be living in a dictatorship, not a democracy. Most people at the time that our country was built did not want a central government. They thought it would give them too much power. They wanted most of the authority to belong to the states because the state governments were closer to the people and would understand them better.

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Technology has played one of the most significant roles in human history, developments that have made it through hundreds of years and made impacts on the lives we live today. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge on machines to help us with our everyday lives. Technology is a showcase of human adaptation which has not only made advancements to society, but increased the comfort and security of our homes and communities as a whole. Technology also has its own story in human history, as it allowed the Akbar the Great and leaders of other countries like the Ottomans to upgrade their military weapons, encouraging their conquest on other lands and also created sails that have allowed humans for hundreds of years to interact with

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

George Washington selected Alexander Hamilton to be Secretary of Treasury and in charge of “directing federal economic policy.” (ushistory.org, Hamilton's Financial Plan) Hamilton then composed and proposed his Financial Plan which contained four major parts: assumption of state debt, The National Bank, promotion of manufacturing and the implementation of taxes. Hamilton believed “the federal government should pay off all state debts at full value” (ushistory.org, Hamilton's Financial Plan) using federal funds. He believed this would increase the validity of the new central government and claimed doing otherwise would “cause citizens to lose faith in the credit and integrity of the struggling government and sabotage the new Constitution.” Hamilton’s National Bank, also referred to as the Bank of the United States, was proposed to help stabilize America’s economy and make it more flexible.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Dbq Essay Examples

Related Topics

Open Document