ipl-logo

Dbq Nationalism And Sectionalism

829 Words4 Pages

Thesis Both Nationalism and Sectionalism developed concurrently during the Era of Good Feelings. The two main reasons why nationalism increased was because of Henry Clay’s American System and Monroe’s policy to increase nationalism. Clay’s AS created a better national infrastructure that tightened America together. Monroe’s policy was to promote national unity and America’s power, which strengthens nationalism. At the same time, sectionalism increased because of the growing divide between the North and South. This was because of their differing opinion on slavery and economic structures. Nationalism became of greater importance in politics at the time because of several factors: Monroe’s policy focused on unity, the AS connected America, and John Marshall’s rulings contributed to national power. …show more content…

Document 3 (John Quincy Adams, Diary)
This helps because it talks about the Missouri Compromise which was about the issue of Missouri becoming a slave state — favorable for the South not of the entire nation (i.e. sectionalism).

The Monroe Doctrine provides evidence that nationalism has a greater role in politics.
Document 4 (James Monroe, The Monroe Doctrine)
The Monroe Doctrine helps because Monroe’s policy centered on nationalism and therefore this doctrine is influenced by it because it states that America is its own country and that it should be recognized as a nation.

This chart provides evidence for sectionalism being apparent.
Document 5 (Population of Enslaved African Americans)
The chart shows the massive increase of slavery in the South and its contrast in the North.

This map provides evidence for sectionalism in economics.
Document 7 (Agriculture, Mining, and Manufacturing Before the Civil War)
It shows the difference in economics between the North, South, and West and provides clear evidence for sectionalism.

This map subtly shows a sense of nationalism.
Document 8 (The Louisiana

Show More
Related
262 Words | 2 Pages

Sectionalism was a leading contributor to America’s inability to reach compromise. The North and South possessed passionate political views that differed immensely. Both the Northern and Southern states felt unheard and unconsidered. The reannexation of Texas proved to be pivotal in how close America came to going to fill out war then. Northerners were willing to take Texas as she was, sought not to change the character of her institutions and realized that slavery existed in Texas.

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

For Northerners, empathy was easier to practice. As the notion of emancipation became more widely discussed by politicians during the abolitionist movement tensions between the North and the South rose. The idea that the nation could eradicate the lifeblood of the southern plantations was deemed unacceptable and the southern states felt helpless. The South fought for state’s rights which is synonymous with slavery as that was the most important right they were fighting for, and the North fought to keep the South from seceding, largely due to South’s interest in maintaining slavery as

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

During the antebellum period of the United States, the era of Good Feelings brought about a heightened sense of nationalism caused by the victories in the War of 1812. In addition, the Erie Canal, finished in 1825, led to an increase in domestic trade and a more efficient means of transportation. These movements created a stronger country with an economy that could support itself financially. These new ideas also expanded domestic trade and transportation movements. Socially, the growing nationalism and the expansion of the country kept the states content; however, the Missouri Compromise in 1820 re-surfaced the continuing issue of slavery, and how the governing body should deal with it, creating sectionalism within the states.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Originally, as a new nation emerging, the United States was focused on building and stabilizing itself in order to seem powerful to foreign countries. However, as time went on, the North and the South disagreed over various issues and were eventually divided. Many events arose which worsened the split between the North and South after the Antebellum Era, resulting in the South seceding from the Union. The reason why Southern states seceded from the Union in 1860 and 1861 was the controversy over slavery between the North and the South. One main event that contributed to the controversy over slavery and the South’s secession was Abraham Lincoln’s election.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

To give the period after the War of 1812 the name of “Era of Good Feelings” would be somewhat-inaccurate. America’s victory in the war surely did unite the states and brought upon some “good feelings” such as unity and growth as a thriving nation, but these good feelings were not all that came out of the war. The states were heavily separated even after the war with conflicts amongst each other and within themselves. Examples of America’s sectionalism come from their social, political, and economic differences, all in which pertain to distrust between the northern and southern parts of the country. Despite all of this, however, there is no denying that there was a sense of pride and togetherness during this time period.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

In the era before the civil war, specifically in the era post-purchase of the Louisiana territories, sectionalism between the Northern and Southern territories spread like wildfire. The Northern states, mainly focusing on commercial and industrial economy, supported the idea of the freedom of slaves. On the other hand, the South, a mainly agricultural and rural society, supported the idea of slaves and slave labor to work in the plantations of white men. These differences would later spark many conflicts (including the Civil War), in which the North was fighting for the freedom of slaves and the South was fighting for the keeping of slaves, especially in new additional territories.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

A motive of sectionalism which caused the Civil War is the contradicting opinions of slavery

Read More
1775 Words | 8 Pages

Nationalism caused rebellions and revolutions, like in Spain. Spanish people wanted to be ruled by a native, and staged revolts to make the French king Joseph surrender his throne. Nationalism also caused the unification of many countries. In Italy, nationalist leaders wanted a unified country. They conquered areas like Sicily and Naples that weren't under Italian control.

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

Constitutionally the North preferred a loose understanding of the United States Constitution, and they sought to grant the federal government amplified powers. The South desired to reserve all vague powers to the separate states themselves. The South trusted upon slave labor on behalf of their economic wellbeing, and the economy for the North was not

Read More
140 Words | 1 Pages

Nativism provided a means of preserving a sense of national identity at a time when social harmony and even the union itself were threatened by an apparent failure of democracy to meet the challenge of social and economic change. I also agree with what you said about John Calhoun 's argument in

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

After the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the rise of the Republican party, Southerners feared the tipping of the balance of political power against them; their need for self-determination parallel the colonists’ belief of rebelling against the oppressive government of Great Britain. However, the Civil War represented something more: the clash of the feudalistic, agrarian South with the industrialized, capitalistic North. These two powers differed socially, politically, and economically, and were especially conflicted over slavery. These two sections of the United States were divided against one another, and could not survive this way. Therefore, it is more accurate to state that though the Civil War resembled some aspects of the American Revolution, it was a clash between two forces who could not exist with one another in their current state, leading inevitably to conflict between the

Read More
1616 Words | 7 Pages

Discriminating as it was, it did help create some form of cognition among American citizens, creating new meanings for the American nationalism. Based on the effects of the racial relations and nationalism, it can be easily summarized that the nationalism attained more actual effects than slavery and racial relations. Thus, a conclusion can be made that the nationalism is more likely to be the key element of this inevitable war, rather than slavery. Based on the arguments that the war took place due to nationalism rather than slavery and its reasons for the shattered cultural cognition among different communities, the ideas from leaders as well as the analysis on the outcomes of the war, a comprehensive conclusion can be made that the civil war was inevitable in the area of nationalism, because it is the core of the civil war, while the slavery abolition is more likely to be a hook and catalyst of the war rather than the essential

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

loyalty to your state or lifestyle rather than to the whole country. The north was against sectionalism and the south liked it. The North wanted the government to rule laws for the whole country and south wanted to have each state choose their own laws individually. south also wanted to return any runaway slaves. (Mrs. Wise) "the Fugitive

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

In American History we are currently studying the concept of sectionalism. Sectionalism is division within a country based on regional beliefs and interest. In the early to 1800’s, sectionalism in AMerica grew as slavery divided the Nation. Slavery was ignored, compromised, and argued about by the states until the conflict drove our country into the Civil War. Although regional differences are not as distinct these days, many issues are currently causing division among the states and people of our country.

Read More

More about Dbq Nationalism And Sectionalism

Related Topics

Open Document