Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Samurai culture in modern japan
Samurai culture in modern japan
Samurai culture in modern japan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Samurai culture in modern japan
There were many similarities and differences between Samurai and Knights, but I believe that the differences are greater than the similarities, in other other words I believe that there are more similarities than differences. The Samurai were honorable warriors in Japan that were loyal to his Daimyos. The Knights were honorable warriors in Europe who were loyal to his lord. I’m going to analyze documents related to social position, training and armor, and their beliefs. To better determine if the differences are greater than the similarities.
Knights and samurai are very similar. They were warriors during the age of feudalism who protected and were loyal to their lord. But while they are incredibly similar, who would win in a battle? However despite these similarities, in a one, in a one one one fight, the advantage would go to the samurai since their armor, code, and training are superior to that of the knights.
Examples of these are that lances were longer than the Japanese Naginata, and swords were much bigger than the Japanese Katana. In Medieval Europe, lords were the military leaders, while in Tokugawa Japan, Shoguns and Daimyos lead the military system. Samurai and knights had different approaches to death, as knights were bound by Catholic law, while Samurai were not religious. Tokugawa Japan had many cultural and traditional differences from Medieval
The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.
For Griffing, in my opinion claim that karate and kung fu are similar because each is an umbrella term for several different variations. Karate and kung fu are different in style, movement, technic and the way they dress. However, the differences outweigh the similarities. For example, karate have four style on its official list, but kung fu have hundreds of categories based on type of movement.
All of this leads to an impact on military, feudalistic society and Japan’s history. To commence, Samurai’s are important in Japanese history because they helped start feudalism and the Shogun’s rule. It all started when the central government had no authority over the large landowners. The Daimyo refused to pay their taxes, so when the Jurisdiction came to collect, the daimyo had this huge army of Samurais.
Samurai and Knights: Were the Similarities Greater Than the Differences? Japan and Europe had unique lifestyles, one part being its military. It consisted of archers, who wielded bows and skilled swordsmen, called samurai. In Europe however, their military consisted of archers and swordsmen called knights. These two military figures share many similarities between each other, outweighing the differences.
Japan’s rich history of power, wealth, and influence had many remarkable eras. One of the more notable periods in Japanese history was that of the Tokugawa Period (1600-1868). The Tokugawa Period was talked about in Musui’s Story, an autobiographical book, written by Kokichi Katsu. (Katsu ix) Katsu wrote Musui’s Story for three main reasons: to share how he had transformed from a low-ranking samurai to a well-known hero, to show his sense of self, and to serve as a cautionary tale for his descendants.
Contention- Ancient Japan and europe had a very similar political system Japan and Europe may not have had any “direct contact with one another” during the medieval and early periods. Yet they developed very similar systems. Systems such as their ruling structure and social groups. They also differed from each other when it came to their religious beliefs and their war structures. Both Japan and Europe were politically similar.
W DID THE MARRIAGES TAKE PLACE DURING THE EDO PERIOD Most of the time marriages during the Edo period were arranged by the elders whose opinion was considered to be better and more important the the preference of the people who were getting married. The process of match making was referred to as Omiai, which though was acceptable to the commoners, was resented by the Leaders or samurai as they considered it beneath their honour to evaluate girls and be infatuated by them. Among the higher class Samurai such as Daimyo and Shogun , if both the families belonged to the same class, the parents and the elders in the family decided among themselves, if they had children of marriageable age.
From the Kamakura Period of the late twelfth century to the Meiji Restoration in the nineteenth century, the samurai have held prominent positions as noble warriors in Japanese society. They have come to be famous in modern, Western pop culture as the fierce, stoic guards of feudal Japan, but their practices and rituals extended beyond wielding katanas and donning impressive armor. Samurai practices were rich and complex, with strict codes, ritual suicide, and a history of influencing culture and politics (“Samurai”). Samurai code was influenced by traditional Japanese culture, Zen Buddhism, and Confucianism. Bushido, or “Way of the Warrior,” was the code of conduct the samurai class were expected to uphold.
The Samurai were created as a result of the feudal system. The feudal system was introduced into Japan in 12th century. This system had a pyramid of social classes, and had powerful families, warlords, and land owners above peasants and merchants. The Samurai were originally created to protect the powerful landowner’s riches. Many of these warriors were just swords for hire, but they eventually turned
The movie, First Knight, tells the story of King Arthur and his chosen wife, Lady Guinevere, as well as Lancelot, the peasant turned into a knight. This story shows some examples of class differences and how they’re perceived in society then and now. Those select few that have the opportunity to live in the upper class have more resources available to them and are able to stay in their status much easier, sometimes at the expense of those in the middle and lower classes. Meanwhile those in the middle and lower classes are often striving to get to the level of class above them or some are just content staying where they are. King Arthur was a peaceful king and spent the majority of his early time on the throne fighting wars for peace and unity for his kingdom.
what really fascinates me is that the samurai weren’t a rare elite force; however, they were an entire social class and they were about 10 percent of Japan’s population at that time. What really grabbed my attention is the way the dress up, they were stylish and at their time they were rock stars in their style of clothing. The samurai dressed up to move with speed, to have freedom of movement and travel. The weapons were unique
Many similarities and differences stood beside the Samurai and the Knights, but was there more similarities than differences between them? Samurai and Knights were both powerful warriors back then. The Samurai had lived in Feudal Japan, and knights had lived in different parts of Europe. They both had different culture ideas, and of course different language, and yet also they both had similarities of them both. These are Social positions, Military training and armor, and Code of Honor.