ipl-logo

Deadly Force In Law Enforcement

1076 Words5 Pages

“Deadly force is generally defines as any force that can reasonably be expected to cause death or serious bodily injury (Petrocelli, 2005).”It is to be utilized by law enforcement as a last resort, therefore, before a police officer goes the route of using deadly force, they must use all non-deadly force strategies unless they feel imminent danger is going to take place. There is no doubt that law enforcement officers will be faced with multiple challenges that put their lives on the line. Law enforcement officers deal with a multitude of dangers everyday, which is why they are trained to know what to do in hostile situations. When it comes to deadly force, the traditional rule of thumb for officers is tat it is allowed if the officer reasonably believes that the person of interest has committed a crime or is going to commit a crime. But how can the officer know for sure?

In the eyes of the law, the statues “standards allow an officer to use deadly physical force when the officer reasonably believes it is necessary to (1) defend himself or herself or a third person from the use or imminent use of deadly physical force or (2) arrest or prevent the escape of someone the officer reasonably believes has committed or attempted to commit a felony involving …show more content…

But respectfully, law enforcement’s duty is to protect themselves as well as the citizens. Sometimes, when using a less deadly force, fighting while trying to subdue a suspect may occur and could potentially lead to what some innocent bystanders call police brutality. Depending on the situation, police officers should know when to use force, and if it comes down to excessive force, then they will have to answer for their actions. Police brutality has no set rules or bindings in state policies. In fact, police brutality is wrong and its considered to be misconduct on behalf of the law enforcement

Show More
Related
209 Words | 1 Pages

608 F. 3D 614 (9th Cir. No. 08-55662, files 6/18/10, withdrawn and amended, 11/30/10) in a 42 U.S.C section 1983 action based on defendants-officer 's use of a taser on plaintiff at a traffic stop, denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed where, viewing the circumstances in the light most favorable to plaintiff, defendant 's use of the taser was unconstitutionally excessive force and a violation of plaintiff 's clearly established rights.  Police must have reasonable grounds to use a taser.  Officer Brian McPherson used excessive force when on July 24, 2005, he deployed his X26 taser in dart mode to apprehend Carl Bryan for a seatbelt infraction, where Bryan was obviously and noticeably unarmed (he was wearing

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

When is it okay for an officer to use deadly force? In the case Tennessee v Garner the biggest issue among the courts was deadly force. Was the deadly force used by Officer Elton Hymon necessary against Edward Garner? An officer should only result to deadly force if a suspect is attempting to flee in order to escape custody or is armed and is threatening the officer’s

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

In other instances, if the opposing threat is brandishing a weapon, then law enforcement do have the right to retaliate by shooting their guns, as this is part of their

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

In the model it urges the officer to consider specific factors before determining if force is necessary to cause compliance. The factors that the officer must consider are “the severity of the crime, if there is a flight risk or the resistance of arrest”. Deadly force in Minnesota is permitted only if it serves in “protecting the officer from death or bodily harm, effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony. For example, if the suspect used or threatened to use lethal force, or if the police officer believes that the suspect will cause death or great bodily if they are not apprehended”. The policy encourages the police officer, if feasible to issue verbal warnings before using deadly

Read More
1724 Words | 7 Pages

How do police decide how much force should be used in a situation and how has that changed throughout the year? Has Tennessee v. Garner been effective in protecting individuals against excessive force? Before the case Tennessee v Garner in 1985, how to police decided if they should use deadly force determined by one of four groups; these four groups were The Any-felon Rule; The defense-of-life Rule; The Forcible Felony Rule, and The Model Penal Code. The extreme one was the Any-Felony Rule which was “English common law authorized officers to use any means necessary to arrest felony suspects or prevent them from fleeing. In the United States, courts interpreted this rule as legal permission to shoot an unarmed felony suspect in flight” (Tennenbaum)

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

In today’s modern society, many feel that is okay for a police officer can kill a man armed with a harmful weapon at any cost. On many news channels, there are various amounts of articles and reports about a police officer committing this act. Even though a police officer has the right to take action against an armed man, this could be argued in many circumstances. In the 2013, Sammy Yatim was a young adult with a mental illness and was armed with a weapon on a streetcar in Toronto. Yatim was confronted by Const.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

One common opinion is that officers should not use more force than is necessary or reasonable, and even then, that force should be used only as a last resort. “Police use force to affect civilians’ conduct. On a day-to-day basis, they do so most often by employing the least degree of force available to them, their mere presence. Cops wear uniforms and drive distinctly marked cars so that, without saying a word, they may have an effect on citizens’ behavior” (Fyfe, 38). When an officer’s presence fails to fulfill the desired conduct, the next course of action for said officer would be verbalization.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

Police work is unpredictable and is very dangerous. In some situations, officers may have to utilize use-of-force tactics in order to gain control of a certain situation. This essay will focus on the discussion of polices discretion to use force limited to a suspect who is being “uncooperative” and what mitigating factors may escalate or de-escalate force response by an officer. Written guidelines have the effect to limit the amount of discretion that an officer might use during stressful and dangerous situations in which they find themselves.

Read More
1898 Words | 8 Pages

Take Home Final Exam 1. Week 2 (Foot) Foot believes that her moral principle can determine the permissibility of an action while the “direct and oblique intention” in the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) “plays only a subsidiary role” (Foot, pg.6). Her moral principle distinguishes between negative and positive duties. A negative duty is an “obligation to refrain” from “killing or robbing” people (Foot, pg.5).

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Police officers have vowed their life to protect and serve. They risk their lives every day for their communities. As the last few years have sped past us, police officers have been very aggressive with the force they use when arresting a suspect, or even people in general. According to a Texas article on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, “police officers typically use force offensively rather than defensively and do so with at least some degree of premeditation.” (Gross,2013, page 167).

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Police officers use the amount of force necessary to ease the situation, arrest an individual, or protect themselves and others from harm. A certain amount of people understand that excessive force is required in different situations. There are moments when police officers will be obligated to use excessive force to calm the situation. For example; Rahtz said, “Then you have others who understand that in some situations, force is not only necessary but is required, if serious, injury or death is avoided” (Rahtz, 2007). Force can be necessary and understood

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

If the law enforcement were to reduce the amount of force the officers are allowed to use, crime would simply be even more out of control. I say because if the officer can 't get control the suspect will easily take advantage of the officer. The current amount of force an officer can use is efficient, for the this reason the police officers have to right to protect themselves along with the community. The law allows police officers to use deadly force if

Read More
2322 Words | 10 Pages

The Specific Challenges of English to French Adaptation Illustrated in The Simpsons The translation of humorous English-speaking television material to French has raised many issues of both linguistic and cultural nature (Vandaele 33). Watching a dubbed version of one’s favorite television show has sometimes proven startling: hearing prerecorded laughs when you did not identify a joke, distinguishing a failed attempt at being funny, or simply not understanding a gag are issues many viewers have had. Sometimes, the humor might also lie in the use of a dialect or of specific words. The famous American sitcom The Simpsons has been adapted in many countries to both the target language and culture. The series is, therefore, a great example of

Read More
1683 Words | 7 Pages

For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

The public has a misconception that deadly force is the same thing as excessive force. They can be similar if the police use deadly force to a point where every officer discharges their entire magazine on person when the threat has been eliminated. Officers receive hours of training on how to shoot a gun, but sometime receive little instruction on how to determine when to use the gun. Training starts in the Police Academy, and continues throughout their careers. There are officers who teach and train the departments every month.

Read More

More about Deadly Force In Law Enforcement

Related Topics

Open Document