ipl-logo

Death With Dignity Policy Analysis

1294 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Death with dignity act pros and cons

How does the implementation of Death with Dignity policy increase patient autonomy and quality of care and what will it mean for our practitioners? The healthcare industry is preparing for many changes that have the potential to affect the industry on a large scale. While preparing for all of the current changes, the industry is also preparing itself to face the baby boomer generation, which will increase the number of society member who will be utilizing healthcare services. Healthcare, as an industry is facing a key time to make changes in order to protect its’ assets and the care given to those who utilizes our services. Funding is at a low, and resources have the potential to become scarce. Some patients are arguing that resources …show more content…

This act would mirror the legislation regarding death with dignity in Oregon, and the requirements set by the legislation. The CARE Act would allow for terminally ill patients who meet certain criteria to request medication that will end his/her life in a dignified and humane manner that is completely up to the discretion of the patient. The requirements would be that the patient has to be as resident of the state of Pennsylvania, the request must come from the patient themselves on a form that would be standardized by the statute, the request must be witnessed by two individuals, one of the individuals being someone who is not related to the patient making the request and has absolutely no financial stake in the process. The patient making the request must be at least 18 years of age, and must be deemed competent by all health officials providing treatment. The next requirement would be that witnesses must agree that the patient is of sound mind at the point of signing, and the patient’s physician must attest to the fact that the patients illness is terminal with less than six months projected to live, there is no hope of recovery, and all options have been exhausted in terms of palliative or comfort care. A second physician must then verify the request, and a patient …show more content…

Financially, there are implications but they are not towards the organization. Many patients cite many different reasons for choosing to follow through with the Death with Dignity process, one of the reasons being the financial implications of receiving treatment that has no hope of working, only prolonging the suffering. Death with dignity has the ability to alleviate some financial burden from health agents as they are not continuing expensive care and resources on patients who no longer wish to receive them. The resources can be used on someone who may truly benefit. Also, political implications are a factor as well. Because there is not current legislation in Pennsylvania at the moment, it is forming a political platform for politicians to take hold of. As previously stated, state representative Mark Rozzi, is currently taking hold of this platform, and suggested a bill to the House of Representatives for death with dignity laws in Pennsylvania. Because politician’s reach is so large, society members are calling upon them to be a voice for change. There are also many stakeholders that would be affected by Death with Dignity legislation, making the policies potential impact very large. The first being the

Show More
Related
1681 Words | 7 Pages

After Maynard went through with this act, the recognition for Death with Dignity began to soar but even then only five states allow this act to be done legally which needs to change. The Death with Dignity Act is an extremely beneficial policy that many people don’t know much about but when correctly educated on the matter many people will realize how truly helpful the act really is. The Death with Dignity policy has been around for over 20 years and has dated back and argued about since the early 1990s. It was officially made a law in Oregon in 1994 with 51% in favor and officially went into effect in 1997 (Oregon 's Public Health System).

Read More
1554 Words | 7 Pages

Public opinion polls showed increased support for physician assisted suicide. This was due in part to technological advances in medicine as well as a greater recognition of patient’s rights.” Twenty-nine-year-old Brittany Maynard, utilized Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act, took her own life in November 2014 following a diagnosis of terminal brain cancer. “A Pew poll conducted after Ms. Maynard’s death, revealed that people viewed this as a heroic act. Also, revealed, the majority of Americans, most likely including physicians, now favor legalizing physician-assisted suicide for painful and incurable conditions: 68 percent in favor, 28 percent opposed.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

Why has dignity become the defining and unifying aspect of the right to die debates? Whether “Dying with dignity” is defined as having a meaningful death or as a death without undue suffering or loss of autonomy (as proposed by the right to die movement), “dying with dignity” is now synonymous with having “a good death.” Dignity represents a taken for granted ideal of both sides of the debate, with an assumption that all human beings desire to die with dignity. Many right to die advocates argue for more relative and contingent definitions and understandings of dignity. In current terms, dignity is subjective and may depend on how the person views their mental and physical being.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

And for that reason, I will confidently vote yes on the Death with Dignity bill in 2018 so that I, or you perhaps, do not have to watch another family member slowly waste away helplessly. In the meantime, Tweet, Instagram, Facebook, and do whatever you can to put an end to unneeded and prolonged suffering and to inform others about the Death with Dignity bill. Because after all, we do all deserve to die with

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

The emotional documentary, How To Die in Oregon, chronicles the Death With Dignity Act in the state of Oregon and its impact on the lives of those suffering with terminal illnesses. The Death With Dignity Act is a law that allows individuals with terminal diseases to end their life at his or her own volition in a dignified manner. Helpless patients in volatile conditions are given a sense control when choosing Death With Dignity. Additionally, Death With Dignity allows individuals to have a sense of closure at the end of his or her life. How To Die in Oregon is intended to reveal the circumstances in which someone decides to end their own life.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

The medical field is filled with opportunities and procedures that are used to help improve a patient’s standard of living and allow them to be as comfortable as possible. Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is a method, if permitted by the government, that can be employed by physicians across the world as a way to ease a patient’s pain and suffering when all else fails. PAS is, “The voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician.”-Medicinenet.com. This procedure would be the patient’s decision and would allow the patient to end their lives in a more peaceful and comfortable way, rather than suffering until the illness takes over completely. Physician assisted suicide should be permitted by the government because it allows patients to end their suffering and to pass with dignity, save their families and the hospital money, and it allows doctors to preserve vital organs to save

Read More
361 Words | 2 Pages

“Be smart, be strong, live honorably and with dignity, and just hold on” (Fray). Physician assisted suicide or better known as Death with Dignity isn’t your everyday topic or thought, but for the terminally ill it’s a constant want. The Death with Dignity isn’t something that all people or religions are in favor of and nor is the act passed in all states in the United States. Only three states in the U.S. today, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington offer their residents the option to have aid in dying as long as all the requirements are met. Death with Dignity doesn’t effect just the terminally ill person, but as well as family and friends around them creating many conflicting thoughts when opinion if Death with Dignity is truly moral and a choice

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

I have known people that have died slowly and painfully and it is very hard to see loved ones live in pain and pass away in pain. I could not begin to imagine what they were experiencing and having to live with. The Death with Dignity Act would provide those people with an alternative choice to the awful circumstances their medical conditions have put them in. This would allow those certain people to be able to pass peacefully and on their own terms. That is why I have chosen to write about the Death with Dignity Act.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Mill is correct to say that everyone should have the right to their own choices, regardless of how it may affect themselves. So long as it does not determent the legal obligations one has for others, an activity such as choosing one’s own course of death would not have a direct effect on those around them. In addition, the entirety of having a criminal prohibition on physician assisted deaths is unlawful under the Charter. It is far more inhumane to allow one to be put through pain and agony rather than the peaceful and painless death through other methods. This prohibition essentially tells others how to live the end scope of their lives, which takes away that individual’s right to their own life without any interference from the state.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

It is believed that once practicing physician-assisted suicides becomes an acceptable concept in society, the next steps will easily be taken toward unethical actions such as involuntary euthanasia. Edmund D. Pellegrino, MD, Professor Emeritus of Medicine and Medical Ethics at Georgetown University claims that our healthcare system is too obsessed with costs and principles of utility. He defies the belief that the slippery slope effect is no more than a prediction, by reminding the outlooks and inclinations of our society. Furthermore, he believes there comes a day that incompetent patients and those in coma won’t be asked for their permission to use euthanasia. The Netherlands is another example of such misuse.

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

While some people may believe that we should respect the wishes of individuals facing ongoing pain and suffering for a terminal illness, and provide the choice of a dignified, pain-free death. This is because dying with dignity means that the someone suffering from a terminal illness should be allowed the choice to end their life naturally and comfortably, rather than live a life in pain and that is prolonged by machines. Dr. Rodney Syme, who is the vice president of dying with dignity Victoria, stated that: "The simple fact is for many people dying is a very painful and distressing experience, causing a lot of suffering." This quote shows that for many people dying is very painful and distressing experience which causes the person to suffer from physical and mental effects. This quote shows that is euthanasia was legal it wouldn’t cause the person to suffer from the physical and mental effects that death has caused on a person.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

However, there is hope of a peaceful death for these patients that exists in a controversial law being considered by many states throughout the country. It is known as the Death with Dignity Act. This law gives terminally ill patients the option of ending their own life in a painless manner at a time and place of their choosing by

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Becoming terminally ill is a tragedy for anyone, no matter what age. Imagine hearing that you have six months or less to live, with the last of your dying days potentially filled with pain and suffering. Imaging making the decision to endure medical treatment that will leave you bedridden, weak, helpless and without any quality of life. The thought itself is frightening and convinces me more than ever that Death with Dignity, a law that allows an attending physician to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to a terminally ill patient, be passed and legalized in each state for those who meet the set requirements and are mentally competent to make such decisions. Washington, Vermont and Oregon are the only three states in the U.S to have enacted

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

These can allow people to have a good death if they are terminally ill and if they are in great pain, and doctors will have the power to help a patient from suffering instead of a slow painful death. Although these are great ways to solve the problem or at least improve the issue it comes with consequences such as more protest can arise by human right groups for example, the right of life group movement and doctors who are against euthanasia. Euthanasia can become stricter for families and it might cause the lethal injection prices to increase. It might also require you to move to another state that has euthanasia since many states don’t allow it. There will constantly have arguments whether it is against the Hippocratic Oath which will cause more controversy, might go against the person/families religion which can cause problems with the church they go to because of their beliefs and perspective, and people will argue whether doctors are playing god, can cause problems with the state law, activist groups, and religion

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Perhaps one of the most important developments in recent years is the increasing emphasis placed on health care providers to contain costs. In such a climate, euthanasia certainly could become a means of cost containment. In the United States, thousands of people have no medical insurance; studies have shown that the poor and minorities generally are not given access to available pain control, and managed-care facilities are offering physicians cash bonuses if they don't provide care for patients. With greater and greater emphasis being placed on managed care, many doctors are at financial risk when they provide treatment for their patients. Legalized euthanasia raises the potential for a profoundly dangerous situation in which doctors could find themselves far better off financially if a seriously ill or disabled person "chooses" to die rather than receive long-term care.

Read More

More about Death With Dignity Policy Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document