Definitions Of Benjamin Franklin And The Stamp Act

427 Words2 Pages

1) In 1765 Parliament passed the Stamp Act, which was the first internal tax on the colonists, At the time, Benjamin Franklin was a colonial agent in London. As colonial opposition to the Stamp Act grew, Franklin found himself representing these views to the British government. Franklin made a testimony against the Stamp Act describing the role of taxes in Pennsylvania and the economic relationship between the colonies and England (94). According to Franklin colonists were paying many, heavy taxes. They were paying taxes for estates, polls, offices, professions, trades, and businesses depending on their income. Along with that the colonists were taxed on wine, rum, other spirit, and slaves. When asked if everyone can pay these taxes, Franklin said no. He said "The frontier countries along the continent, have been frequently ravaged by the enemy and greatly impoverished, are able to pay very little tax..." (94). This is one clue that Franklin gave as to why the tax will lead to a massive colonial outrage, …show more content…

Franklin responded that the Americans would think the resolutions were unlawful and biased. Just as Franklin predicted, there was an outrage among the colonials. Many different protests were held against the Stamp Act. One act of protest was when James Otis in Massachusetts coaxed his fellow members of the colonial assembly to call an intercolonial congress to take action against the new tax. They called themselves the Stamp Congress and in October 1765 they meet in New York with delegates from nine colonies to make a petition stating that the colonies could not rightfully be taxed except through "their own provincial