ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Democratic Leadership

1308 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The relationship between leadership styles

Alma Monge
Prof. Joan Ready
BSC407_08_MM: The Effective Organization
6 August 2015

According to Cherry (n.d.), the democratic leadership style is also know as participative leadership specifically because individuals forming part of the group are able to have a more participative function in the group’s decision-making processes. All members of the group are able to participate as they please given the free exchange of opinions and ideas, and the continuous encouragement of discussion about group issues and projects. Democratic leadership is characterized by the promoting of team members’ sharing of ideas and opinions but with the leader(s) preserving the final word about the team’s decision-making.
The democratic leadership style’s …show more content…

Even though this style of leadership may be considered archaic, it still offers many benefits to current teams and their goal-achieving processes. The major pros of the autocratic leadership style, as stated by Joseph (n.d.) are:
- Quick decision-making processes. Since the leader is the only one who makes decisions through this style of leadership, there is no waste of time. The leader is the sole responsible for the decision made and therefore it can be made quickly in order to keep up with the competition or prevent problems.
- There is close oversight of subordinates. Because of the former, it is harder for team members to get derailed and waste time and other resources since the leader is attentive to most activities taking place within the …show more content…

In both leadership styles, the leader is the one to ultimately have the last word in the decision-making process. In both, group members are delegated activities and, although they are more scrutinized under an autocratic leadership style, they cannot be monitored 24/7, therefore leaders eventually have to give their subordinates some space to fulfill their activities. Both type of leaders have to offer guidance for their subordinates since they will not always clearly understand the activities delegated to them. Therefore, both type of leaders have to be clear and objective when assigning tasks and activities to their subordinates. Also, both leadership styles are similar in that they cannot be implemented in all scenarios. For instance, democratic leadership style would not work in a military scenario and an autocratic leadership style would not work in a charitable association

Show More
Related
1687 Words | 7 Pages

This leadership style is effective because it allows the members to have a say in how the group is conducted. The leader and the members select the activity, share in leadership, and give feedback to each other through their successes and needs (Cole,

Read More
1667 Words | 7 Pages

Democrats repeatedly encounter trouble with voicing consensus in a debate that centers more and more on the means of the established foreign policy rather than on its ends. In spite of common support for multilateralism and America’s role as a Global Good Samaritan, Democrats have teetered between the assertions of the “dove” and “hawk” wings of their party since the Vietnam War. As a result, the splintered facets of the Democratic Party have perpetuated the perception that Democratic political leaders are not relevant in the foreign policy arena. Furthermore, Democratic public servants (particularly Democratic Presidents) consistently present notions of America’s global leadership that demonstrates the divide among the party elite and the

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

In Chapter 7, we learned that if power and jobs are shared in small groups, rather than one person holding all of the power and responsibility, leadership can be shared, decisions can be made as a team, and groups may end up feeling more satisfied. As designated leaders are known from the start, others may emerge and use their power or ability to lead the group as well. This being said, it may be each group member’s responsibility to act in ways that will lead the team to success. With each group member having the ability to act as leader, groups members should use behavior that inspires the team to do their best. According to our textbook, leaders can be effective by promoting diversity, including all members, and not perceiving anyone as

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

Accordingly, the 2016 elections proved how increasingly irrelevant the Democratic Party finds itself in large swaths of the country. Likewise, more than a third of all House Democrats come from just three states: California, Massachusetts, and New York. This recently exacerbated problem was relayed by Congressman Ryan on an appearance of NBC’s “Meet the Press”. “It’s time to do something about it, not just talk about it,” he continued. “Because now we’re not even the national party.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Some may say this is the least productive form of leadership. They don’t offer any type of guidance and the group members will be the ones making all the decisions. There is often a lack of motivation in the group and no clear defined role. The last form of leadership is the Participative or Democratic leadership. These types of leaders are usually the most effective because not only do they offer guidance, they also allow and encourage participation from the members.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

Definition of Democratic Leadership “The democratic leadership style is based on mutual respect. It is often combined with participatory leadership because it requires collaboration between leaders and the people they guide. The

Read More
1550 Words | 7 Pages

Rather, a leader should recognize the areas of strength in other members of the team. Leaders should be facilitators for projects. Ultimately, they make sure work gets done at the highest caliber possible. They do so by inspiring members of the team to contribute a high level of effort and dedication. That being said, I do not think it is right for a leader to sit back and let others complete all the tasks.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

With regard to many historians and thinkers, there exist a great deal of components within the modern democratic governing systems that are not helpful at all. Phenomenons like poorness, stray communities, classism and political decomposition exist within most democratic institutions for the time being and the actual cause for this skepticism and negativity in the democratic governments is the regular lack of control and the impact by disqualified individuals in terms of their selfish goals and elitism. As a matter of fact in organizations and systems that supported ranking categories, there exist regular worries toward dominating elements among social and political doers. That is why there exist a sort of an unbreakable attachment among the

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

The leader listens, facilitates, and begins to shift responsibilities to the team member. The leader encourages the team member to solve their own problems. The delegating style of leadership allows team members greater autonomy in performing tasks. At this level, team members are competent, motivated,

Read More
1301 Words | 6 Pages

If you ask a Republican about the Democratic Party, the majority of the time something positive will not come out of their mouths. However, there are several pros to the Democratic Party that Republicans will either refuse to accept or speak about. The pros of the Democratic Party are their stance on marriage equality, belief in science and global warming, and defending of women’s right to have an abortion. Democrats possess several positive aspects of their party that they unfortunately do not receive credit for, despite helping the country’s citizens especially gays and women. Let us not forget all Democrats have done for the environment, including protecting the air that we breathe.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

America was built on the Democratic system. It has been this way from the beginning of our history, and will most likely stay the same forever. However, some people have been questioning if our Democratic system is actually working as it was intended to. Like all forms of government, democracy has its flaws, however, in the end, it is strong and working.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

They can both struggle to get people to follow them. Part of this is because they are unsure if you are deserving to be in that spot and partially because they dont know or trust you yet. The next level of leadership is permission. This is different from positional because people follow permission leaders because they want to not because they are forced to because they have a leadership job title.

Read More
1757 Words | 8 Pages

Democratization has so far undergone three waves and two reverse waves. These waves of democratization have introduced countries to democracy. The first wave of democratization started in 1828 and lasted until 1926 (Huntington, pg.16). This was followed by the first reverse wave which lasted until 1942 (Huntington, pg.16). This was followed by the second wave that started towards the end of World War Two and lasted until the 1960s.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

There are many different type of Leadership styles. Different types of leadership styles exist in work environments. ● Laissez-Faire- A laissez-faire leader does not give direct supervision of employees and does not provide regular feedback to those under his supervision.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Democratic Leadership

Related Topics

Open Document