The aim of this paper is not to analyze Descartes and Hobbes ideas and what does he say about the God and what he says about the concept of error or mistake. The overall effect is to raise some doubts about association of Descartes’ philosophy with others philosophy In meditation III, Descartes establishes the argument on the existence of God. He tried to seek to prove the existence of God from the fact what does he know about him moreover, He settle an argument on if the god is not just his imagination and rather, his idea of god is something he was born within. The one thing that Descartes argued the most about the cause of how element A depends on element B, then apparently have much more reality than the A itself therefore as he states, “Father is the principle of the son, do not on that account grant that the son came from a principle; just so, although I have granted that God can in a certain sense be called himself”. So basically, A simple things that can’t produce anything more complex than itself. In this case of the god, whatever is produced as a result, it must belong to the same order of complexity. Furthermore Hobbes, try to come on the top of Descartes by conferring his theory on “But …show more content…
existing is no less of the essence of an infinite being than having three angles equal to two right angles is of the essence of a triangle.” Descartes took over by stating that if efficient is pursued with respect to existence, in God essence and existence are not distinguished so one can see an