ipl-logo

Desert Lands Act Compare And Contrast

597 Words3 Pages

you will compare and contrast the Homestead Act of 1862 and the Desert Lands Act of 1877. Some things to consider: What were the goals of both Acts? Were they successful? If so how? As America continued to grow and prosper, the only logical place to continue was westward where over 200 million acres of land was ripe for progress and growth on the other side of the Mississippi. The government at that time had many miles of federal land and was of the mindset that they could grow the country and bring some money back into central government by selling these parcels of land off to Americans. The distribution of Government lands had been chaotic since the Revolutionary War: overlapping claims and border disputes were commonplace. The Homestead Act of 1862 and Desert Lands Act of 1877 helped to promote ownership for homesteaders and spur westward expansion. …show more content…

The investment needed to purchase these large pieces of land was a daunting undertaking; it was an undertaking a newly freed African American worker or small farmer could never hope to accomplish. By 1880, the minimum parcel one could buy was 320 acres, and though they could pay in installments it was not a realistic possibility for many. The Homestead Act was a federal law announcing that an applicant could own 160 acres of land free of charge for the next five years, with the only stipulation being he or she must live on land improve the land and build a home. After five years, the homesteader could file for a title by submitting proof of residency and required improvements to a local land

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The document of the Homestead Act was one of the first factors towards development in our nation. This act offered free or cheap land to anyone who would live and improve the Great Plains area. The people taking part got 160 acres of land, had to build a house on it, and live on it for 5 years. The act encouraged immigrants and freedman to travel out west. This act gave opportunities to many individuals that would not be given before.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

2. Examine the importance of the following for the land rights movement: Native title –Mabo case and Wik decision. (5 marks) Aboriginal people experienced and still experiencing effects from the dispossession on their spiritualities. However, through the Land Rights movement Aboriginal people achieved part ownership to the land that is rightfully belongs to them.

Read More
1310 Words | 6 Pages

This gave people incentive to move because they were given 160 acres of land for a small filing fee, and the land would be theirs if they lived on it for 5 years ("Homestead Act."). This was a loss though because many of the people who moved onto these lands did not have the resources to farm. The natives had their old, traditional ways of farming, and with the expansion the Americans had so much more land to farm on. The Ojibway people had a season specific

Read More
1852 Words | 8 Pages

The changes that were seen after the act was put into law included the end of the communal holding of property by the Native Americans. They would fractionated into individual plots of property, which caused more than half of their lands to be sold off. Women were not given any land under this act, and had to be married to receive the full 160 acres offered. While the Act was supposed to help the Indians, many resisted the changes that came with individual property ownership. They thought that becoming ranchers and farmers was distasteful.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

One of those treaties was The Homestead Act, which means the white settlers can claim 160 acres of land for free as long as they stay to live on the land for five years and set up some resources. Most of the land that the white settlers were claiming was the Plains Indians land which was thousands of acres. Dawes Act is another act the government sets up into place. It was never to help families, but to wipe out the Plains Indians culture for

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

The states sold their land grants to bankers and land spectators. 3. Homestead act, which allowed people to buy a piece of land for a very cheap price although there were some exceptions like you have to be 21, you must live on the land for 5 years and you had to improve your land. 4. All private property was equal.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

The idea he brought into light about the image of the frontier and the west inspiring American development can be seen throughout this time, and into the 20th century as well. As America moved to the west, more areas where becoming populated and developed, creating new challenges for the government. Some included requesting protection provided by the government against feared Indian tribes. Also, large land owning railroad companies would ask for lessening fees paid to the government and acquiring additional lands to assist them in developing rail lines in many portions of the west. As the frontier grows, the government continued passing legislation to support and give incentive to those to go out west.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

Also, The purchase is considered the land deal of the millennium. During the 1800’s the U.S started growing very quickly and needed

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

In the early 1800s 500,000 acres were given to eight states and eventually land was given to 19 states. The federal

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The people who settled the west were greatly dependent on the US government and the policies they adopted. The settling of the west in the late 19th century was similar to the settlement of the south in the 1830’s. Andrew Jackson drove out the indians so that the valuable land of the south could be secured by white settlers. Once again, the federal government made it possible to settle the west by forcing indians off of their lands. A recurring theme in American history is manifest destiny and the attempt to develop unsettled lands by the federal government.

Read More
189 Words | 1 Pages

In this year in civil wars there are some settlement in Homestead act of 1862 they in western in united states that in American are mostly are freed slaves sure would able to put thing into those claim around in American. Nearly in 10% all this government has held all this property is like lots is like 420,000 square miles in this world is it territory by around. The Homestead Act is in public in land they are more small farmers. When this political is it likes influence are Free State sates. Is it and opposition for them homestead bill and as other thing they has to improvement others thing you would able to know.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s Speech to Congress on Indian Removal was given at a time of westward expansion, which was greatly influenced by the idea of Manifest destiny (Bentley 695). Manifest destiny also greatly influenced the national sentiment of the time, which can be found in Jackson’s speech. Jackson uses nationalist and colonialist rhetoric in this speech, particularly when he discusses his idea of progress. At the time of this speech, nationalism and colonialism greatly impacted both racial and economic policies in the United States, and the preceding Indian Removal Act of 1830 was also reflective of both the United States’ racial and economic policies, and greatly impacted the racial makeup and economy of the country for the rest of the nineteenth century and beyond.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Although the land only cost around 5 cents a square miles, it still had to be paid for. Jefferson agreed to pay $15 million dollars for the land, while America was still in debt. This also upset Americans because not only did they think it was unconstitutional and hypocritical, but now Jefferson had spent $15 million dollars. The purchase doubled America’s size, which also doubled administrative cost for the land. Since there was now double the land more people had to be hired to take care of the land, farm, build, and manage all of the land that had been purchased.

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

The Homestead Act is a special Act that promoted migration to the western part of US. Public lands were made easily accessible to settlers with a small filing fee in exchange for 160 acres of land to be used for farming. Homesteaders received ownership of the land after continuously residing on the land for five years. Homesteaders also had an alternative of acquiring the land from the government by paying a specified amount per acre, after six months of residency. The Homestead Act resulted in the distribution of million acres of public land (Library of Congress n.p).

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

The U.S had gained a lot of land, or frontiers in the West from Mexico. The land was undeveloped, therefore the U.S had to find a way to develop the land. The U.S would come up with the Homestead Act. The Homestead Acts states that any citizen or anyone planning to become a citizen is eligible to gain 160 acres of land, typically to form farms. The plan was intended to make the people stay in that land and create a

Read More

More about Desert Lands Act Compare And Contrast

Related Topics

Open Document