ipl-logo

Devils Tower History

1206 Words5 Pages

Since it became a national monument in 1906, Americans and people all over the world have been able to enjoy the tremendous views, climbing opportunities, and cultural heritage of Devils Tower. The land has a rich cultural heritage, being used both by the Lakota tribe and as a stepping stone to westward expansion in the United States. The most widely accepted historical accounts show the Lakota tribe reaching the Black Hills around 1775 (Kurkiala, 447). Devils Tower quickly became a sacred site for the Lakota, and is frequently used in religious ceremonies in the month of June. A century later, Devils Tower was one of the areas of land allocated to the United States in the passage of the Dawes Act in 1877 (National Congress of American Indians …show more content…

The rules regarding climbing equipment ensure that Devils Tower is able to maintain its natural beauty by eliminating climbing tools that break into the rock and by disguising climbers from people who are observing Devils Tower at a distance. Additionally, trail closures and rehabilitations ensure that the land will not degrade over time from overuse and pollution, but will be preserved by NPS. Finally, the request to not climb in June is consistent with NPS policy on religious ceremonies and services in parks. When there are ceremonies for other religions in a national park, NPS does not close the area but instead asks that visitors refrain from using it out of respect for the ceremony (Cross; Brenneman 26). These protections serve everybody who accesses Devils Tower by ensuring that the park is sustainable for future use. Additionally, they protect the cultural heritage of the land by preventing park users from disturbing Lakota ceremonies unintentionally through damage to the land and by notifying park users of actions that would be considered disrespectful to the Lakota. Devils Tower is a public park, and the management plan in place now respects both Lakota and public …show more content…

The assertion that the land should still belong to the Lakota because the United States violated the Fort Laramie treaty by acquiring the land without Lakota approval has been undermined however by the United States Supreme Court. In the case United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980) the 8-1 ruling was that the United States’ “sole legal shortcoming was the failure to pay just compensation” for the land (Pommersheim 116). Although the land was seized using moral justifications that ranged from questionable to outright egregious, the Lakota were just as expansionist when they arrived on the land less than 100 years before (Kurkiala 449). The United States continued to honor the law however, and proposed paying $17.5 million to the Lakota as compensation for the land. The court later revised this number to $122.5 million by compounding a 5% interest annually (Churchill 135) but the Lakota response to this was that they were no more willing to take the new offer than the old one. The Lakota even coined the phrase “The Black Hills are not for sale” to demonstrate that they are not interested in a monetary sum but rather the land itself. This is disingenuous however because while the Lakota base their claim to the land in the idea that it was illegally seized, they cherry pick

Show More
Related
820 Words | 4 Pages

“This is our land! It isn’t a piece of pemmican to be cut off and given in little pieces to us. It is ours and we will take what we want.” (voices and visions chapter 8 pg.181, poundmaker in the english tongue) The Cree and many Métis believed that the land was theirs and they were entitled to it.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

In the testimony before the House Committee on the Public Lands on June 1913, Pinchot (an advocate for conservationists) stated that “the use of the park will be enormously increased” (Pinchot and Raker 2).  This means the the ability to have multiple use of the land can allow the government to create more than just an attraction site, but also create activities and different things people can do there for a price. Also in the testimony before the House Committee on the Public Lands on June 1913, Pinchot also stated that “the national park will be visited by a very large number of  people who cannot visit them now” (Pinchot and Raker). This gives government the opportunity to make money, because people would pay money in order to see the beauty of the land now that it is cleared up.  

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

Johnson v. McIntosh was a title dispute over acres of land in present-day Illinois. The case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall in 1823, turned on the question of whether or not Native Americans had the right to transfer land title by sale to private citizens. Like many cases that determined the rights of Native Americans, the litigants were non-native whites. The inquiry “therefore, is in a great measure, confined to the power of Indians to give, and of private individuals to receive, a title which can be sustained in the Courts of this country” (pg. 13). In finding for the defendant McIntosh, the court ruled that the nature of Indian title is such that Indians can only transfer title to the federal government.

Read More
107 Words | 1 Pages

Indians have always had their things taken from them by whites. However, the U.S. Government may have gone too far on this one. After being taken from their original lands and put on small reservations, some Indians have been wanting all whites to suffer. These people of the Sioux tribe were called Ghost Dancers. They believed if they did a certain dance, their gods would destroy the U.S. and similar establishments.

Read More
1642 Words | 7 Pages

These could all certainly apply, but the more crucial reason for their continued presence in such an unenviable place is that for the Lakota, Pine Ridge Reservation is

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

There’s an article by Dina Gilio-Whitaker, a native American woman, Called “Decolonizing the Black Bear Ranch Hippie Commune”, written earlier this year. This article articulates her, and many other natives’ views towards the 70’s hippie movement. They personally believe that the hippies were thefts then in a way we currently call cultural appropriation. “Hippies flocked to Indian reservations searching for Indian wisdom” but they then took that knowledge and bought cheap lands, stolen from “the very people they were trying to emulate”. Black Bear ranch is a piece of this stolen property and many are asking them the question that if its stolen land, can it really be “ free land for free

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

Whether Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policies were ethical has come of debate from the time they were enacted and before. The time that Jackson was president has been fittingly named the Jacksonian Era. One of the iconic images of this era is a political cartoon that depicts President Jackson as “King Jackson the First” as he steps on the constitution and the Albany Plan of Union. I think that Jackson’s actions were not ethical.

Read More
1733 Words | 7 Pages

The removal of the Cherokee, or more commonly known as the “Trail of Tears,” was a defining American event that left an incredible historical impact. The Cherokee and other Native American tribes were being moved westward by the American government for various reasons such as disputes with white settlers, the desire for the gold on the Cherokee lands, the desire to civilize them and other reasons. However, it was far from a simplistic dispute between whites and Native Americans. There were many whites, including President Jackson, as well as some Cherokee, who supported the policy to move the Indians west. Opponents of the removal also included both whites and Cherokee.

Read More
104 Words | 1 Pages

They were very upset with the whites’ intrusion into their lands in the Black Hills. The Second Treaty of Fort Laramie gave the Indians exclusive property possession of the Dakota Territory. Then there was a discovery of Gold on the land, causing many intrusions.

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

Said gold lay rest on Sioux reservation land, which the United States hastily attempted to purchase. That fall of 1875, a US commission departed to each of the Indian agencies to hold councils with the Lakota with hope to gain the people's approval and thereby bring pressure on the Lakota (Sioux) leaders to sign a new treaty. Lakota resentment toward the U.S. government was at a peak, owing to the hasty and violent expansion into Native territory and disrespect towards sacred and imperative land. Ergo, Native leaders not party to the reservation treaties refused to negotiate, thus sparking a series of battles and negotiations to last from 1876 into

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Those who live around the Devil’s tower believe that it should not be reserved or be given to one set of people but rather everyone should use it. In the documentary one man said that this has nothing to do with the Native Americans religion, but rather they are just trying to capture and acquire back land that they lost. I believe the reason why people have different ideas about this natural feature is because we were all brought up differently. For example, if the Climbers who disregard the Native Americans beliefs were brought up in that environment, they would definitely feel differently about it. One thing that really caught me of guard was in the beginning of the film where the elderly lady said, “I don’t go down to you white people’s church and raise hell”.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

xIs it wrong to kick someone out of their own home when they didn’t do anything wrong? The Cherokee was in that same situation. The Cherokees’ situation was just like taking a cell phone ,which is dear to a human, away. They were kicked off their own land. They had done nothing too bad, but the Georgians wanted them to leave.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Ethos Rhetoric: The establishment of national parks in the United States was a visionary act that showcases our nation’s commitment to the environment. Over the years, these protected areas have become symbols of pride and conservation. By visiting national parks, we embrace a collective responsibility to protect our natural heritage. As stewards of this land, we honor the sacrifices made by our predecessors and uphold the values upon which our nation was built.

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

In the smoky mountains there is a lot of bad air pollution because of power plants and industrial emissions are blowing bad air to the park and because of it there is wildlife that is being affected more than it should be. A lot of things are changing from air pollution, climate change, water issues, and foreign invaders that want to take things from the park not knowing if it will affect it or not. National parks are sites that should be protected.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

National parks are a place where people can go enjoy nature at its most natural state. Many other “natural” things in the world have been mutated, or have been changed to make it more beautiful and more appealing to people. However, a National Park is something that has been around most likely for years and should not changed but instead preserved so that years into the future people can still enjoy its natural look. “Congress decreed that 2.2 million acres be reserved and withdrawn… dedicated and set apart as a public park or pleasuring ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people”(Layzer, 279). National parks were for people to enjoy in a way that is enjoying to them.

Read More

More about Devils Tower History

Related Topics

Open Document