ipl-logo

Did Thucydides Believe In The Story Of Athenian Democracy

1793 Words8 Pages

Much of Athenian life and politics was based on stories of Athenian history. These historical events shaped the way and life of Athenian actions. Yet what happens when the histories that become integral aspects of Athens are based on inaccuracies? The history of Harmodius and Aristogeiton and the impact that it had on Athens was so deep that it led to the catastrophe that was the trials surrounding the defacement of the statues of Hermes. However, Athenian misunderstanding of the situation brings into question the legitimacy of Athenian democracy as a whole, something Thucydides uses his retelling of Harmodius and Aristogeiton to convey. As Athens was preparing for the siege on Sicily, the city fell into a panic after all of the statues of …show more content…

Thucydides tells that they had taken this story very much to heart (6.60.1) and it had a deep effect on the mood of Athenian political life. Believing that it was a statement against tyranny and for democracy, the story caused them to be fearful of anything involving tyranny and oligarchy. The fear that this story caused is what led to the massive paranoia surrounding the Herms and Mysteries. Alcibiades enemies used the accusation against him as a way to suggest he was conspiring against Athenian democracy. The Athenian misunderstanding of the history that led to their fear of tyrants is the same as their current misunderstanding of the truth in these trials. They took the defacement of the Herms as an omen for political uprising in the same way that they took the killing of Hipparchus as a sign against tyranny. The situations of the defacement of the statues and the mocking of the Mysteries were not connected in any way. Yet the Athenians took them as one in the same, similarly to how they viewed the death of Hipparchus as the death of a tyrant. In reality, the killing of Hipparchus was a statement of personal revenge against someone who sought to come between two …show more content…

Aristogeiton and Harmodius can stand for the demos. Both groups become overcome by their paranoia, which lead them to make disastrous mistakes. The enemies of Alcibiades and Hipparchus were both in a position of almost being the one in power. Hipparchus used his position to attempt to seduce Harmodius and then seeking revenge by embarrassing his sister. Alcibiades enemies seek to destroy his reputation so that they can move up in power. Alcibiades can be compared to Hippias in the fact that they were both destroyed by the actions of those below them. Alcibiades enemies sought to undermine his reputation and get him ousted from power. Eventually, he is in exile and is never found by the Athenians. Hippias was a moderate leader who was not oppressive. Yet the actions of his brother, which led to his death, took a major toll on Hippias. He was overcome by paranoia and became an oppressive tyrant because of

Show More
Related
444 Words | 2 Pages

The historian Thucydides described himself as a wealthy Athenian general whose exile to the Peloponnese allowed him to personally observe, from both the sides of the conflict, a comprehensive account of the Peloponnesian War. Book 1 in Thucydides’ “History of the Peloponnesian War” is dedicated to explaining over fifty years of the events and proceedings that led to the abandonment of the Thirty Year’s Peace and subsequent war. In Book 1 he identifies four main incidents, which I shall refer to as ‘grievances’, regarding the conduct of Athens towards both their Delian members and the Peloponnesian allies. Yet he also mentions what he deems to be a more ‘real’ truth than these four grievances that led to Sparta and the Peloponnese going to

Read More
1387 Words | 6 Pages

They used the scandal to accuse him of attempting to overthrow democracy. The assembly had suggested the impeachment of Alcibiades because of his alleged lack of respect for the gods. Androcles, his mortal enemy, used his influence and encouraged the negative feelings towards Alcibiades. Many of his enemies utilized their hatred towards him and convinced other people to feel the same way. A man named Diocleides came forward after the mutilation of the statues and denounced the names of three hundred people who he claimed were responsible for the crime.

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Dionysus chose Aeschylus because he answered Dionysus’ question about saving the city properly by giving an adequate answer. Aeschylus was the perfect choice since the competition came down to the city and Euripides proves he is a man of ornate speech which is not good when the city ‘s livelihood depends on clear and concise action. The response to Dionysus’ question about Alcibiades from Aeschylus was more impressive to me because he encompasses Alcibiades as a whole by saying “it is not very wise for city states to rear a lion club within their gates; but if they do so, they will find it pays to tolerate its own peculiar ways” (187). Aeschylus tells us the overview that Alcibiades might be a polarizing or peculiar figure, but he is also

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

How does fear influence a person’s individual actions and decisions? In most cases, extreme fear makes people act in an emotional way, whether that be good or bad. Thucydides takes this human nature characteristic one step further and argues that humans act out of self-interest. This human nature plays an imperative role in the function of a Democracy. The unique aspect of democracy is that power lies with the people.

Read More
1786 Words | 8 Pages

The suffering that litters The Aeneid is characterized as unfair and unjustifiable, the violence and the war set on the fickle whims of the gods and goddesses. Although Juno’s hatred could not have been avoided or calmed by Aeneas, her hatred is still painted as avoidable and uncertain in the sense that happenstance was the primary contributor rather than some inevitable

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

Hippias who was known as a tyrant is an important individual in the history of Athenian democracy. As the leader of the Athenian city state along with his brother Hipparchus they were supposed to be the continuation of a stable government system that was built upon by their father Peisistratos and those before him. However, with the actions of his brother and then Hippias quickly afterwards led to a series of events that are an important part of the history of Athenian democracy. The actions of his tyranny is something that individuals from the present can take as a history lesson of how important the influence and treatment towards the citizens of a government is. Another reason that makes Hippias’s historical influence important is how his

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

Hippolytus' punishment for rejecting the goddess Aphrodite happens behind the scenes from mortal eyes. Court cases, on the other hand, show a high level of involvement with the Athenian community who collectively decide the judgement of

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

(pg. 142-143) (17). Using the words from Mikalson, Dillion concludes that it is both ironic and unfair for a pious character such as Hippolytus, who had proven to be the most loyal to the gods to be a reflection of Euripides own

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Despite the fact that Herodotus makes reference to an anticipated history of Assyria, his just known work is the History. This early composition work consolidates individual investigation into the geology, ethnology, and myths of Asia Minor with an endeavor, in Herodotus ' own particular words, to record "those extraordinary and awesome deeds, showed by both Greeks and savages" and to discover the reason for the Greco-Persian battle. A great part of the topographical and ethnographical portrayal in the History is the aftereffect of Herodotus ' own voyages; yet he likewise draws widely and trustingly on the breathtaking records of storytellers. Isolated into nine books, the History is composed in an open, recounted style with numerous stimulating

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Prometheus is a prominent character in Greek Myths that receives a transformation with the onset of Greek Mythological Tragedy. In a two-hundred-year period, Prometheus is transformed from a Titan that undermines the new ruling gods, that are meant to re-establish order in a disordered universe, by trickery and deceitfulness, into an honored rebel that fights against an unjust and tyrannical godhead (Harris and Platzner 78). This change that Prometheus goes through is due to the political changes that are happening in Athens around the fifth century B.C. With the introduction of the newly founded freedom of democracy combated with the invading forces of the Persians and Peloponnesians that want to usurp democracy, there is a need for a

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

In the History, Thucydides shows that power, if it is unrestrained by moderation and a sense of justice, brings about the uncontrolled desire for more power. There are no logical limits to the size of an empire. Drunk with the prospect of glory and gain after conquering Melos, the Athenians engaged in war against Sicily. They paid no attention to the Melian argument that considerations of justice are useful to all in the longer run (5.90). And, as the Athenians overestimate their strength and in the end lose the war, their self-interested logic proves to be very shortsighted indeed.

Read More
1353 Words | 6 Pages

Following the two decades after the Persian Wars, the city of Athens grew to embody political and economic prowess in the western world. Under the rule of Pericles, Athenian society enjoyed an era of democracy and relative peace. As it is sometimes referred to as the “Age of Pericles”, this classical era was a watershed moment in Athenian and Greek history as a whole as its influence would go on to reverberate throughout many subsequent societies and eras. In a speech written by Thucydides for Pericles to present, “The Funeral oration of Pericles” offers key insights into the Greek classical era and Athens role in such. Through analyzing the textbook activity “The Funeral oration of Pericles” this paper will draw upon excerpts from Pericles’

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

In The Frogs, Euripides claims that his plays teach the audience "how to think" and to argue logic. This new way of thinking was fairly new to Athenians, it was also promoted by several philosophers and taught by sophists, but no one trusted philosophers or their questions because they claimed to be manipulating words to distort the truth. Aeschylus, aims to promote heroism and virtue in his plays, and this way of promoting successes was familiar to the citizens. His method of storytelling was favored because the citizens needed to feel happy and successful, despite the reality going on around them, which is portrayed and favored by Aristophanes himself. The story allows the playwrights to criticize each other which aids in signifying the differences between the two.

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

Theatrical pieces written during the Golden Age of Athenian society are becoming increasingly relevant to contemporary society as we extend ourselves from the time in which they were written. These artefacts reveal mainstream and widely accepted worldview of the people from 5th Century Athens. Although Euripides’ work specifically is not a reflection of 5th Century Athenians’ as Euripides was too critical to give a positive or accurate representation as he had a biased opinion. Euripides tended to challenge these value systems slightly as there was much hypocrisy and superstition in his environment at the time. Despite this, his works still contributes evidence on how they may have looked upon the world, as he writes from a differing perspective.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Solon, who was Athens’ political leader during the first half of the 6th century BCE, had enacted reforms that were failing and were causing political unrest within the polis. By 560 BCE an aristocrat by the name of Peisistratus proclaimed that as tyrant, he would be able to solve Athens pollical problems. However, unlike Cypselus, he was not successful in seizing power on his first attempt around 560BCE, nor his second attempt in 557BCE. After his failed second attempt, Peisistratus realized that needed more troops and more alliances outside of Attica in order to successfully seize power.

Read More

More about Did Thucydides Believe In The Story Of Athenian Democracy

Related Topics

Open Document