ipl-logo

Differences Between 1850 And Missouri Compromise Of 1850

575 Words3 Pages

There are many similarities and differences between the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850. However many people manage to mix the two up, understandably so, as they both sound the same. But there are many differences that people should be aware of. For example, One compromise kept peace for a period of time, and the other one just riled up more people. Understanding these differences is crucial if one would like to learn about the Civil war. So, this essay will explain one from the other. The Missouri Compromise has many differences from the Compromise of 1850. One difference would be that in breaking up the different parts of the Louisiana Territory, it created peace between Northerners and Southerners. The Northerners were happy that more territory was safe for freed slaves, although they weren't quite happy that there was still slavery in the USA. However, the southerners stayed happy until the Southerners realized that this gave congress a say in which states could have slavery. The Missouri Compromise also banned slavery for the rest of the Louisiana territory. …show more content…

For example, The Compromise defined new boundaries of Texas after the Mexican American war and awarded Texas $10 million. A huge difference that came with the Compromise was that it outlawed the slave trade in Washington D.C, stopping people from selling or capturing African Americans that had previously been free as long as they were in D.C. Despite the good things that came from the compromise of 1850, many troubling issues appeared as well. Including the fugitive slave bill in the Compromise(which had been made up of 5 bills), which required all citizens to help slave owners find their slaves if one had run

Open Document