ipl-logo

Similarities Between Autocratic Leadership And Dictatorship

851 Words4 Pages

GETTING CERTAIN INTENSITY WITH AUTOCRACY In the simplest form, autocratic leadership described as gathering all power and privilage in one hand. Rudin states that kind of leaders was rushing to give achievement and penalties or having no feelings for others ' thoughts at all. (1964) In history, there are many autocratic leaders that left a good footprint on historical road and most of them showed successful leadership, had control over people mostly. Thus, autocratic leadership is the best way of having control over a group. Some may argue that autocratic leadership leads to dictatorship and dictatorship leads to resentment among people. Also, in addition, they claim that autocratic leadership rises controversy between public and increases the hatred to the leader. Yet, those claims can not go further than being cruel. If a leader is well-equipped, people start to feel absolute trust to the leader, they back up leader for utter strength. On the other hand, in public view, it feels soothing to give responsibility to one mind. People mostly do not stand for taking responsibilities in serious times. Also, opponents of autocratic leadership claim that everyone has right to share ideas. They argue that autocracy obstructs to birm of better ideas and further, the ones who disagree with their leader gets pushed out. However, those arguments are mostly irrational. In "Autocratic Leadership: Use Sparingly!", it is argued that if duites have to be done in haste and time is important, whilst the decisions needs rational call, mostly there will be no time for open chat between public. Adding that, most people can not think logical at all. (n.d.) Eventually, it can not be expected that all people are educated, rational and trained for making hard calls in hard times with emergency. Thus, autocratic leadership prevents dualism to not have friction and gains power with believing in same ideas. …show more content…

Using autocratic leadership in managements provides better systematic progress. In authoritarian leadership, there are easier controlling mechanism due to congregating in same thoughts which are belong to the leader. Furthermore, sharing duties in parts with each person, only allowing making a specific task, provides systematic progress. Countries which use systematic progress with hard discipline and authority like Germany, China, Japan and North Korea are far beyond in technology, education and property compared to the other countries which do not use them at

Show More
Related
1334 Words | 6 Pages

Many leaders throughout history have tried to gain as much power as they possibly could, not stopping until they had absolute power over an empire. This may even mean killing your own family and friends to obtain power. There has been few rulers who have been able to successfully rule as an autocrat and even fewer leaders being able to keep their entire empire on their side. If you proved to be an unsuccessful ruler, and the empire you are ruling does not like you, their is a good chance you will magically disappear leaving your family to wonder if you had really died of a “hemorrhoid”. As an autocrat, the goals the ruler will have is to expand the country 's borders, keep peace between the religions, and create new laws for the better (Document

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Two such dictators were the infamous Adolf Hitler and the Soviet Union’s Stalin. Both ruled with an iron fist and demanded full support of their system whether they used terror or plain appeal. Totalitarianism,

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

Seth Marshall Professor: Messersmith Comp 2 2/22/16 Different Leadership Styles All people have different opinions on how a leader should handle things. Such as war, people, poverty, and even themselves. Both Machiavelli in “The qualities of the prince” talks about on how a prince is supposed to be a leader and that good leaders must learn not to be convenient or compassionate to keep stability. Lao Tzu in “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” believes in having a silent leader so the people will do what he wants them to do and fill like they are not being guided.

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

Through the use secret organizations, these leaders were able to control the citizens under the government and earn their respect so they would not have to face consequences such as going to a concentration camp or death. By manipulating the youth, leaders were able to build a basis of respect from young kids for generations to come. Lastly, propaganda made leaders look more appealing and make other organizations look bad to get more votes for their party. In conclusion, totalitarian leaders were able to effectively gain and maintain power through the manipulation and termination of all opposing

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Tyranny has been prevalent throughout history with leaders such as Kim Jong-Il, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler. All of these dictators shared a group of traits. The most recognizable characteristic of a tyrannical rule is fear of the ruler. Dictators often maintain a higher class than the people they rule, leaving the citizens poor. More often than not, tyrants are not voted into power.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout, we witness constantly the dictators manipulation in the people's mind. The people are not allowed to envision anything about themselves, but only about them as a whole. “We are one in all, and one in all in one. There are no men, but only the great WE One, indivisible and forever” (Rand 19). The dictators have completely re-arranged their minds to foresee that is no self thought but only group thought.

Read More
1133 Words | 5 Pages

History has seen many strong leaders who have used their power for good but also abused their power for their personal harmful plans. Autocrats are rulers who influence everything in their region, they have been seen throughout the centuries. According to document 4, the characteristics of an autocrat state how they “control religious authorities, make laws, limit or control the power of nobles, and use armies to expand or consolidate borders under the ruler’s control.” This shows how they influence religion, and armies to extend the empire and change aspects of people's lives. Autocrats would have a desire for power which would have an impact on people's lives.

Read More
222 Words | 1 Pages

The example i used from freshman year is Animal farm. The animals wanted to get back at the farmer and all planned to attack him. They soon became the rulers of that farm. After Old Major died, Napoleon and Snowball made an attempt to rule over the farm. Both of their ways were very controlling so their type of leadership would be considered as dictatorship.

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

A dictatorship is government ruled where one or more than one group is in full control over every aspect of government. It’s the absolute rule made my one person over many people that the government oversees. Now with the way dictatorship is set up, democracy and people’s opinions are hard to come by. This idea that every dictatorship is evil isn’t always the case. There are such things as a good dictator who listens to the people, but that is very rare.

Read More
2445 Words | 10 Pages

The feminist and gay rights movements both avoided formal leadership in favor of a decentralized decision making structure. The people no longer trust their leaders and are even starting to indict the system itself. They think we can do better. We are all leaders. Such leadership style is messy but that efficiency is not the point.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

Over time, this results in the loss of the people’s ability to think logically to generate doubts against their leaders. The government’s implementation of mass-surveillance techniques makes people vulnerable to their leader’s conditioning. Both regimes draw upon the human nature of conformity to mold its citizens’ behaviors so that they are more subservient to the party. Although these points are important, the premier idea is that people are unaware that they are subjected to conditioning by relying on an authoritarian leader to select rules of conduct that needs to be enforced and make decisions in lieu of

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Various reasons prove this, though the people believe that they are better best served before the state, history only shows the most benevolent and the most hated rulers. So if a ruler rules just to be well-liked history does not show that they had any significance because none of the people are left to remember what acts of kindness they performed. If a leader is feared but provides huge expansion and sets up their state to be successful in the future they are remembered as important to causing their state to be the way it is today. In truth, all people serve to their own interests and will turn on anyone who goes against it unless they are controlled. It is nearly impossible to control people with their love for ruler because they will not love the ruler once the ruler goes against their interests, but if they fear the ruler they will fear going against them and stay under the influence of their ruler.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Totalitarianism is frequently depicted by the political savants as a mix of belief system and tyranny which comprises in perceiving limits on the forces of individual natives in taking choice. Unexpectedly vote based system does

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

This can be compared to a direct democracy, in which the citizens directly vote on all issues of importance. In authoritarian and totalitarian political regimes, one person, entity, or party has complete control over the affairs of the state, without the input or consent of the population. In totalitarian regimes specifically, this leader attempts to control all aspects of a society, including things like the personal beliefs and morals of the population. These are sometimes accompanied by a cult of personality around the leader or leaders, as in the case of Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany. Common forms of authoritarian or totalitarian regimes include military juntas, in which a small committee of military leaders rules the country or a single-party state, in which only one

Read More

More about Similarities Between Autocratic Leadership And Dictatorship

Related Topics

Open Document