Differences Between Georgia At Its Origin And In The 1770s

The Differences Between Georgia at Its Origin and in the 1770s Georgia at its origin in 1733 did not resemble Georgia in the 1770’s in many ways. These differences include the laws pertaining to slavery, the treatment of women, the type of government, the territory changes, and the economic development of Colonial Georgia. These changes affected the Colony of Georgia in many positive ways such as making the colony more profitable, better governed, and larger. When James Oglethorpe founded Georgia in 1733, he had a plan to take people that were in prison for indebtedness, not being able to pay ones debt, and bring them to the colonies to start over. Oglethorpe got this idea because one of his closest friends, Robert Castell, was imprisoned because of his debts and died from small pox due to the horrible conditions he was put in because he had no money. Oglethorpe was alarmed by this and set out to fix it. He imagined a colony where these people who where imprisoned for not being able to pay their

Georgia was charted by King George II in 1732, and was to be governed by a group of trustees for twenty-one years. “The Georgia Trustees were a mix of wealthy merchants, landed gentry, and Anglican ministers.” The Trustees ran their government through James Oglethorpe and supported his ideas fully. “The Trustees adopted the Latin motto Non sibi sed allis (‘Not for self, but for others’) as they crafted rules and regulations to shape the colony into a utopia where there would be no social classes and colonists would succeed by their own efforts and hard word.” The Georgian Colonists were getting upset with the trustees’ laws pertaining to slavery and not being able to seize the rice market fully. One year before the Georgia Trustees were to surrender the colony to the crown. They got rid of the law abolishing slavery and handed over the colony to the