ipl-logo

Differences Between North And South Constitution

629 Words3 Pages

“We have the oldest written constitution still in force in the world, and it starts out with three words, 'We, the people.'” said Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Our constitution has proven its merit over the centuries time and time again. However, in order to create the constitution, we follow today our forefathers had to deal with a lot of problems. The convention, among other things, focused on solving problems that would hinder the progress of the constitution’s development. The conflicts between the Northern and Southern states proved one of these problems. The North and South were polar opposites. This lead to many disagreements between the states due to conflicts of interest. In order to improve relationships, the convention had made the states compromise so that everyone would be pleased.
One of the compromises made addressed North and South conflicts regarding slaves. The Northern states were …show more content…

The Fugitive Clause of the Commerce Compromise is mentioned in Article IV Section II Clause II of the Constitution. The Commerce Compromise was another compromise between the North and South that helped restore state relationships. Since the Northern states were mostly industrial, they wanted the government to regulate interstate trade, but the Southern states, which were mostly agricultural, did not want the government to regulate trade. The Southerners were also angry with the Northern states because they would not return their slaves who ran away to the North for freedom. This led to the Commerce Compromise, which stated that the government would regulate interstate trade in favor of the Northern states, but the Northern states would have to return any runaway slaves from the South, which was in favor of the Southern states. The Fugitive Slave Clause in the Constitution states that if any slaves attempt to escape to the North for freedom, the Northern states would have to return them, and slaves would not gain

Show More
Related
1040 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution: It’s Shield Against Tyranny “The United States of America”, or better yet what individuals know and cherish as the land of the free and home of the brave. Going all the way back to the colonial period of the 17th century to now, one can’t help but to recognize the documents that implemented this country’s first sense of structure. Beginning with the Articles of Confederation, which was the country’s initial constitution, posed serious weaknesses, like the inability to enforce laws or the total lack of an official court system. After a prolonged debate, the first Continental Congress met in Philadelphia to draft together a new written U.S. Constitution, which would not only replace the Articles of Confederation and fix all

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

The fugitive laws were laws passed by the united states congress in 1793 and 1850 to provide for the return of slaves who escaped from one state into another state or

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was an Act of the United States Congress to give result to the Fugitive Slave Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In this acts, south purposed to assist the recapture and extradition of runaway slaves. In addition, they intended to make federal government giving a pledge to let holding property in slaves be legal. The international slave-trade clause restricted slavery after 20 years. As Waldstreicher illuminated that this clause gave slavery 20 years for wanton trade (2015).

Read More
1406 Words | 6 Pages

Therefore, Northerners felt that the tariff was

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

In the declaration of the National Anti-Slavery Convention , it was stated “that every american citizen who retains a human being an involuntary bondage as his property is a man stealer”, and that “slaves ought instantly to be set free”(Document B). Because of this, they also claimed that “congress has a right... to suppress the domestic slave trade between the several states, and to abolish slavery and those portions of our territory which the constitution has placed under its exclusive jurisdiction”(Document B) .The North was no longer tolerating slavery in any part of the union, which led to turmoil between the North and the South. Also, in the past, the North was known to evade established compromises regarding slavery. Among individuals and the legislators of the North, there has been“a disinclination to perform fully their constitutional duties in regard to the return of persons bound to service with escaped into the free states”.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

South vs North The south thought they could do what they wanted .Before the Civil War the South depended on slavery and the North was more of a Industrial. Then there were arguments about slavery should not be in the new states .People came up with compromises to fix all the fuss of which state is free and which state is a slave one.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Following the end of the American Revolution marked a new set of problems for the United States. As impending war debts were threatening to crush the new nation, America knew they needed to address the flaws of the Articles of Confederation through a Constitutional Convention. The United States Constitution of 1787 was created in hopes of developing a stronger and more effective governing body while still upholding America’s virtues of freedom. Unfortunately, with change, comes opposition, and many people feared that the Constitution would be oppressive and undermine the autonomy of the individual states through its strong central government. Because of this, the issues that sparked the greatest controversies during the ratification of the

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout United States history there have been numerous issues, constitutional and civic, that Americans have debated. One of these constitutional issues that Americans debated, is the ratification of the Constitution. Federalists and Anti-federalists debated over the Constitution’s ratification for years. As a result of these debates, efforts by individuals, government, and groups, such as the Federalist Party, and James Madison, were made to address this issue. These efforts were very successful.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

This Fugitive Slave Act in 1850 tightened the South’s grip on its fugitive (runaway) slaves by punishing those who harbored runaways in the North. The impact of this legislation was pertinent as well to the growing sectionalism leading up to the civil war. Northern abolitionists were inflamed by the passage of this Act. In response, many Northern states passed their own “personal liberty acts” in attempts to override the Act in the

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the mid 1800s, tensions between the North and South were high; they could never seem to agree. They both had different views on how they wanted to be governed and how they wanted to live their life. As the US started expanding across the coast, issues arose with how states should be run. Especially after the Mexican-American War, many issues presented between the north and south. Although they tried to fix these issues, their solutions never lasted for long.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

The government prohibited the slave trade in the District of Columbia. The Fugitive Slave Act was also a part of the Compromise of 1850. The Fugitive Slave Act required northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners in the South. The act extremely angered the North because they were required to take part in slavery. The South did not like the addition of California as a free state.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

They’re two parts in the compromise that would help the South, and the North. The Fugitive Slave Act was passed part of the compromise of 1850. The Fugitive Slave act helped the South because a slave couldn’t just escape to the North to be free, now they would have to go to Canada to be free. Anyone in the North who saw a runaway slave would be forced to return the slave to its owner, and if they didn’t, then they would be fined up to $1,000, and then be forced to bring back the slave anyways. The North did get something from the compromise as well, California would be admitted as a free state, and the South couldn’t get anymore slaves from outside the

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

History is fraught with examples of governments and principles which, in their infancy, were unable to escape controversy and therefore have become the subjects of much political and academic discourse. The Constitutional Convention, convened by the early United States in 1786, is one such example of this phenomena. With two distinct sides arguing very different point, the Constitutional Convention set the stage whereby the longest-lasting written government in the history of the earth would be both drafted and implemented. The Constitutional Convention balanced the desires of both the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists in order to draft, amend, and ratify the Constitution of the United States of America.

Read More
2124 Words | 9 Pages

It was conceived to force states to deliver escaped slaves to slave owner’s violated states ' rights due to state sovereignty and was believed that seizing state property should not be left up to the states. The Fugitive Slave Clause states that escaped slaves "shall be delivered up on claim of the arty to which such Service or labour may be due". During the

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was originally enacted in 1793, but amended in 1850. It is a law that allows slave owners to capture and return runaway slaves. The Act further mandates the Northern states to aid in the capture of runaway slaves or be fined. The Act created several reactions especially from the black communities of the North who were looking to free slaves of the south. The Act brought danger of slavery close to them as well, and no black person was safe under the new law.

Read More

More about Differences Between North And South Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document