ipl-logo

Differences Between The Pre Civil War Period

456 Words2 Pages

The actions of the United States government toward Native tribes have changed drastically over the course of American history. The pre-Civil War (1776-1860) period was characterized by a policy of displacement, removal, and assimilation of Native tribes as the United States sought to expand its territories. After the Civil War (1864-1890), the government adopted a policy of reservation-based Native self-determination, which allowed Native tribes to retain their autonomy and cultural identity.
In the pre-Civil War period, the government’s treatment of Native tribes was largely based on the Doctrine of Discovery. This doctrine stated that the European settlers had the right to claim and settle on lands inhabited by Native tribes, and the tribes …show more content…

For example, both periods saw the government attempting to control Native tribes and their lands. In the pre-Civil War period, this was done through forced removal and assimilation. In the post-Civil War period, this was done through the establishment of reservations and the negotiation of treaties. Additionally, both periods saw the government attempting to gain control of valuable resources in Native lands. In the pre-Civil War period, this was done through the displacement of Native tribes. In the post-Civil War period, this was done through the negotiation of treaties that ceded Native lands to the United States in exchange for cash payments and other considerations. In conclusion, the actions of the United States government towards Native tribes have changed drastically from the pre-Civil War period to the post-Civil War period. In the pre-Civil War period, the government attempted to assimilate and remove Native tribes, whereas, in the post-Civil War period, the government adopted a policy of reservation-based self-determination. Despite these differences, there are still some similarities between these two periods, such as the government’s control of Native tribes and their

Show More
Related
622 Words | 3 Pages

“The settler colonial logic of elimination in its crudest form, a violent rejection of all things Indian, was transformed into a paternalistic mode of governmentality which, though still sanctioned by state violence, came to focus on assimilation rather than rejection.” –Patrick Wolfe, After the Frontier: Separation and Absorption in US Indian Policy, 13 Wolfe’s statement illustrates how the US government put more emphasis on legalized absorption of Indians into the White society rather than using forceful and violent methods to acquire the Natives’ land. After the colonization of the westward land and the end of the Frontier era, the US government’s method of assimilation of the Indians started revolving around allotment and blood quanta. With no place to further push the Natives away, the established Bureau of Indian Affairs and the government took action to eliminate the Natives culturally and spiritually instead of physically.

Read More
276 Words | 2 Pages

Hello Tamara Thank you for the insight on the federal Indian termination policies durning the 1950’s,and our selfish acts in attempting to move Indians off reservations and into subruban areas, I feel that justice could never be made for the todays native americans simply because the suffering we put their ansestors through could never take away the tears or pain we inflicted on them ,even though our federal government had even initiated a policy of removal as well as termination of the native americans under this particular policy that was souly created so the Native American people would no longer be government wards on reservations which todays era they are entiltled for the most psrt “subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The existence of tribal sovereignty over hundreds of years has sparked the assimilation that the doctrine of American Indians is not only a lawful perception, but also an essential component that defines the evolution of our country. Tribal sovereignty addresses the right for tribes to govern themselves (Internet citation) and for them to mandate their property and their land’s decisions, but if so is the case, why have infinite number of tribes been removed from their territories? Without a doubt, this paper will explore and argue how our country has been affected because of unfair laws and policies that have unreasonably been established to tribes. In order to justify this argument, I will discuss the concerns revolving the Doctrine Discovery,

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

The criticism of the reservation system for Native Americans highlights a shift towards individualism and severalty advocated by some scholars and

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

government’s main goal was to displace them from their lands for the sole profit and benefit of the American people. This notion was achieved upon the Indian Removal Act of 1830, issued by President Andrew Jackson himself. Jackson admitted that though the general policy was to civilize the Natives, the government was also keen to “purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness” (Doc 4). The wilderness, in this case, would be the designated Indian Territory west of Missouri and the Arkansas Territory (Doc 7). This territory was leagues away from the various tribes’ homelands, one tribe even being removed from the southern tip of Florida.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

Losing one’s cultural knowledge, and therefore the reality of their culture, allows others to have control over their collective and individual consciousness as well as their destiny. In this case, it is clear that the United States government has had the dominant relationship over the Native

Read More
1855 Words | 8 Pages

Although friction between Native Americans and settlers existed from the moment the first Europeans arrived in North America, the moment of the forced relocation of the Native American population in 1830 marked the lowest point in. Conflict arose especially in Andrew Jackson's presidency, as Jackson influenced the American population to turn against their native peers. The forced removal of Native Americans from their native lands triggered one of the greatest human migrations in North American history. American western expansion, the ideology of manifest destiny, and racist conceptions during the mid 19th century onward permanently impacted many native American tribes through cultural, economic, social, political, and environmental ideologies because of the American’s view of Manifest Destiny and the need to conquer land.

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

government towards Native Americans during the Progressive Era were not implemented in the best interests of Native Americans, but rather in the interests of the U.S. government and white settlers. These policies were motivated by a belief that Native Americans were "primitive" and in need of "civilizing," which led to the loss of Native American land and resources, as well as cultural genocide and trauma for generations of Native Americans. It is important to acknowledge and address the harm caused by these policies in order to move towards a more just and equitable

Read More
1352 Words | 6 Pages

In the late 1800s, tensions were rising between white Americans and Native Americans. The white Americans wanted the Native Americans to conform to their definition of civility. The Native Americans had clung tightly to their culture and religious practices during a time of continuous encroachment and governmental pressure by the white Americans. By this time, Native Americans had already been forced westward onto reservations through government action. Andrew Jackson had set this migration in motion earlier in the century, and the migration pattern would later be referred to as the “Trail of Tears”.

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

Devin Plascencia HST 2201 Enslavement may have functioned as the single-greatest contributing factor to the economic prosperity of the United States. Even so, enslaved Americans’ experiences were far from singular. Not only did enslaved experiences differ based on the demands of each cash crop – namely tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton – but also based on the size of slaveholding residencies, urban or rural conditions, and the temperaments of individual enslavers. Historical eras also informed differing slave experiences. Making use of evidence from historians Peter Kolchin and Chandra Manning, I argue that the experiences of enslaved Americans differed between the antebellum period and the Civil War.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

Due to Westward Expansion in the late 1800s, the Native American's land was taken away by the U.S. government. The U.S. government made the wrong decision to take Native American land and give it to the settlers. Native Americans had the land first. However, people who disagree say the U.S. had a growing population and they needed a place to live and farm. The government’s decision to take Native American’s land was an atrocity.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Indians were seen as a part of the citizen ship of the country as they were given the opportunity to enjoy the rights of all Americans. One such right was the ability to join the armed forces to defend the country in World War Two which gave the Native American a sense of belonging. Furthermore the Federal government through congress in 1946 acknowledged the fact that they had mistreated Native Americans and offered compensation to the tune of 800 million dollars which did more harm than good as it caused unwanted internal conflicts within tribes. Another development to improve life for Native Americans and its relationship with the government was the reintroduction of self governance which aimed to preserve the cultural predilection of Native Americans to tribal governance in which they are able to make and adhere to their own rules and

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Struggling to advance in society while being driven out of their culture, their lands, and their once made promises. Prior to the Louisiana Purchase, Native Americans received a proposal to unknowingly deny their identity and form part of a new identity, the white settlers. “President of the United States, Jefferson developed what he considered to be a rather generous policy to encourage native peoples to assimilate” (Kubic 6). Assimilating that the Native Americans would take in and embrace the white settlers culture, language, and

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction In 1855, the United States government negotiated a treaty with Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation that ceded 6.4 million acres of tribal ground. The treaty allowed the tribes to maintain hunting and fishing rights on some of these lands. This paper explains the Treaty of 1855 and what it led to (CTUIR Tribal Hunting Rights Reserved in 1855 Treaty).

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More

More about Differences Between The Pre Civil War Period

Related Topics

Open Document