ipl-logo

Differences Between Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions

856 Words4 Pages

The Virginia and Kentucky resolutions as explained by Madison and Jefferson respectively were aimed at expressing the support for the United States constitution, as well as the constitution of these states . These resolutions were also aimed at safeguarding the constitutions of these two states, as well as the act of Congress against all forms of foreign and internal aggression. These resolutions contradict with the excerpt from the proclamation on nullification by Andrew Jackson. Here, a declaration was made to nullify some parts of the Acts of the US Congress that imposed duties and imposts on all imported foreign goods. The proclamation made it clear that these parts of the US Congress Acts were a violation of the true meaning and intent …show more content…

The resolution made it clear that it was wrong to allow the exercise of power by “Alien and Sedation Acts." In this case, the powers in these acts were not delegated to the federal government . It can be argued that the nullification proclamation was misguided. It declared that the people of South Carolina shall consider all acts developed by the Federal Government to abolish or shut its ports, or block free entry of vessels to the ports. This was inconsistent with the long-term continuance of the state with the union. On the other hand, the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions declared that the states shall act in accordance with all Acts developed by the Congress. The Virginia-Kentucky resolutions made it clear all acts that are not developed in line with the Congress Acts tend to violate the right of freely examining public characters, as well as the free communication of the people. Therefore, these acts should not be implemented . It is intriguing how one state could be advocating for the observance of all acts developed by the Congress whereas another state has stated that it cannot implement certain acts that seem to violate its interests. The nullification proclamation was established with the intent of safeguarding the port interests of South Carolina. However, this could have formed a fatal precedent to other

Show More
Related
643 Words | 3 Pages

Reflective Personally, I believe that in the grand scheme of things, this decision has limited the powers of the states opposed to the federal

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

The Virginians took the land by force (Dunmore’s War) because Britain was not going to play apart in negotiating land. The built up anger amongst those land speculators led to them making one of the most important decisions in American history. Because wars generally violate treaties with Britain and the Indians, Virginia needed to declare independence to have the right to do what they pleased. Holton’s opinion opened my eyes.to different views of the American Revolution than was once perceived. I thoroughly enjoy this section and believe it was necessary to include because it showed that the Indians made peace among their nations to try to keep their

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

Kentucky v. King 1 Audelio Camacho Professor Alva AJ 180 3-27-17 Kentucky v. King The Supreme Court Case of Kentucky v. King occurred on October 2005, when Police officers in Lexington, Kentucky did a “buy bust operation in which a confidential informant attempted to buy crack cocaine from a suspected drug dealer.” The undercover was police officer Gibbons. When officer Gibbons gave the signal that the transaction was completed, the police approached the scene with their marked police cars. Once they were close to the suspect, Officer Gibbons radioed in a description of the suspect and said that King had gone through a specific hallway at a apartment complex. As the officers got to the hallway, a door was shut closed and the officers smelled

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Webster argued the Constitution was design to settle such economic disputes between states. Allowing concurrent laws to conflict would be dangerous and contagious if not handled by the federal government. Attorney Writ supported the federal supremacy over these states was enumerated in the Constitution. Gibbons’ steamboats operated “among several states” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.), and the Commerce Clause states, “ Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among several States, and with Indian tribes” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.). Gibbons’ steamboats in fact operated in New Jersey and in New York; therefore it aptly applied in this situation.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

In order to calm things down, they made the Force Bill which forced them to pay the taxes. If they did not, then President Jackson had the right to harshly make South Carolina do it, by using the army. Jackson did not agree in letting a state nullify Federal

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

Nullification was a controversial constitutional theory started by John C. Calhoun. He came up with the idea because he believed the tariff of 1816 was responsible for fall of South Carolinas economy. When in fact it was the exhausted farm land in the state which had caused the downfall. With his future political dreams resting on how he met this challenge in his home state he developed the theory of nullification. The theory stated that a state can suspend, within its boundaries, a federal law that was thought to be unconstitutional.

Read More
68 Words | 1 Pages

A state resolution passed in 1798. Written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1798 and 1799 declaring the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional, the resolution supported the idea of having more self government and more rights for states. Opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts which extended the powers of the federal national. The resolution hinted that states had the power to nullify federal laws that were

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson was the third president of the United States. Jefferson was president from 1801-1809. One action Jefferson took was going to war with the Barbary pirates. Jefferson also made the Louisiana purchase.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

“The lack of… nationality, I believe, is one of the great evils of the times…” Senator John Sherman stated on February 10, 1863. The United States had been split into sections from the beginning, and it created a lack of unity and togetherness. In Document A, the reader can acquire from the reading that South Carolina (and later many other states) seceded from the Union because of states’ rights. Document A states that an amendment (specifically the

Read More
228 Words | 1 Pages

“By the last years of the 1790s, the prospect of war with France and Federalist security measures such as the Alien and Sedition Acts brought the nation to the brink of political upheaval” (Nash, p. 214-215). The acts were controversial and leads into a political debate. The Kentucky assembly stated that the acts violated the Bill of Rights. They wanted to get rid of Federal laws, however, this was not the first time they have done this action. People believed that the acts were unconstitutional and unfair.

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

The Kentucky Resolution was drafted by the vice president who in that time was Thomas Jefferson, the Kentucky Resolution talked about the things that have been resolved about the country. That people have more liberty and that they have the right to have power to judge the constitution. He says that the constitution does not have the right to take away the rights that the people have. “The Kentucky Resolutions, drafted by then Vice-President Thomas Jefferson, argued that the government was formed by a compact among the states and that the federal powers were limited to those delegated to it in the Constitution.” It is shown that Thomas Jefferson was trying to limited the power of the constitution, so the constitution would not abused their power with the country.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

Immediately after the issuances of the proclamations, the United States government had to decide on whether to view actions/movements of the Confederacy against the blockade as an act of war. Technically, any rebellious acts would be considered as opposing the United States and thus seen as an “arm insurrection” and deemed treasonous. However, the government only considered the Confederacy as rebels rather than as belligerents. According to The Civil War at Sea, “Throughout the war, Lincoln insisted that the Confederacy had no legal standing as a sovereign entity; those who had taken up arms against the government, he declared were merely rebels.” This has a contradictory factor to it due to the very nature of the blockade itself.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

DBQ #1 FCA#1 FCA#2 FCA#3 In 1492, Christopher Columbus discovered the land, which had become of great interest to the Europeans when they started to colonize the land in the 1600’s. The colony of Massachusetts was settled in 1620, by William Bradford and John Winthrop. All the settlers seeked freedom of religion in a new land. The other colony of Virginia was settled before Massachusetts in 1609, by the Virginia Company.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

The Ohio Bank v United States of America case is an example of the nullification attempt by Ohio where state government denied to accept the decision formed in case of McCullouch v Maryland case and so, Ohio took $100,000 from national bank of America but later the Supreme Court held the Ohio’s tax and said it is unconstitutional and case was closed after controversies. The South Carolina case for nullification is another example of the nullification where the nullification of the law was proved right and the new legislation was passed for south Carolina state for the no tariff and the federal law was not applicable for that state for that particular law. The northern states were developing through industrialization but the agricultural region of southern states were not and imposing import tariffs would help industries to produce their own goods but for southern states the raw material import cost also increased and so it directly effects the southern states. So, a lot of southern states demanded for nullification of law and the law was amended for southern

Read More

More about Differences Between Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions

Related Topics

Open Document