ipl-logo

Discuss The Nature And Scope Of The Legal Issue Of Criminal Responsibility

2405 Words10 Pages

Inquiry Report

The Legal issue of Criminal Responsibility in Queensland

Examine the nature and scope of the legal issue of Criminal responsibility in Queensland and analyse the viewpoints of two groups of stakeholders regarding the age of criminal responsibility. Using this analysis, evaluate two legal alternatives to reform existing laws in Queensland and their implications. Provide justification for recommendations to ensure just and equitable legal outcomes.

1500 — 2000 words

May 2023
Contents
Contents……………………………………………………………………………………….2
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….3
Nature and Scope of the Issue……………………………………………………….3 The concept of doli-incapax…………………………………………………….3
Viewpoints of Stakeholders…………………………………………………………..4 …show more content…

In Queensland, the age of criminal responsibility is currently set at 10 years old, a threshold that has generated significant debate among legal experts, youth advocates, and community organisations. While some argue that the current age is too low and fails to account for the developmental maturity of young children, others persist that it is appropriate and necessary for maintaining law and order in the community. This report will examine the legal nature and scope of the age of criminal responsibility in Queensland, with a focus on the age from which children can be held criminally responsible. By analysing opposing viewpoints and acknowledging the key principals of law in Australia, this report aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the issues surrounding age of criminal responsibility in …show more content…

Furthermore, Article 40 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child underlines that"children accused" are to receive legal assistance (ie. Rehabilitation, etc.), without prescribing a specific age of doli-incapax. As such, it falls under the jurisdiction of individual countries to determine this on the basis of existing laws and cultural norms (United Nations, 1989).
Viewpoints of Stakeholders
Raising the age of Criminal responsibility
Legal Experts (1), youth advocates (2), and communities (3) argue that the current age of doli-incapax of 10 years old is too low, and that it should be raised to 14 in line with international standards (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2020). This viewpoint is supported by evidence from Queensland, and supporting countries that dictates that children at the age of 10 are not developmentally mature enough to understand the consequences of their actions, let alone be held criminally accountable for them (Australian Human Rights Commission,

Show More
Related
1302 Words | 6 Pages

Director of Justice Reform and the MacArthur Foundation, as well as Christopher Simmons advocate Laurie Garduque reminiscences on the disregard for criminal juveniles during that time: “As concern about increasing juvenile crime peaked, we were alarmed at the wave of harsh juvenile justice reform sweeping the country that blurred lines between adults and juveniles… Existing research did not address the legal implications of adolescent developmental immaturity with respect to competency, culpability, and capacity for change” (“Roper v. Simmons Ten Years Later”). A similar sentiment was shared with Columbia Law School professor Elizabeth Scott, who recalled the conditions for criminal youth in the early 1990’s, asserting that “...attitudes about juvenile crime became more punitive, and it was clear that lawmakers weren’t focusing on developmental differences between teens and adults or how immaturity might contribute to juvenile offending” (“Roper v. Simmons Ten Years Later”). There are a myriad of scary commonalities between these anecdotes, such as the legal disregard for youths despite their underdeveloped brains. There are many factors that make adolescent minds susceptible to committing crimes.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

This concept allows the law to treat children different in order to prevent children and young people from being exploited, to protect young people from the consequences of making uninformed decisions and to protect others from being disadvantaged by dealing with a person who is a minor. Doli incapax is a principle of juvenile justice that suggests that infants are incapable of committing wrong as they have an insufficient knowledge of good or bad. This Latin term means ‘incapable of wrong’ and as the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1997 (NSW) states, is applied to children under 10 years old as a conclusive presumption. At 10 – 13 years of age there is a presumption of doli incapax but there may be rebuttal. When an offender reaches 14 – 17 years they are considered to be criminally responsible for any offence committed which is actus reus and capable of having mens rea which is criminal intent but there will be some differences to the adult system.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Anthony S. Tomasso Professor Rodriguez ENG-101 12 APR 2023 The Struggle Between Juvenile and Adult When we as a society picture what age group is the most innocent and precious, we typically agree on children. When a child commits a serious crime such as: rape, murder, armed robbery, many teeter between sentencing that child as an adult rather than a child. In this essay, “Sentencing Children as Adults” by Terence Gorski (2001) discusses the difference in the Juvenile Justice system and how detrimental it is to not place the juvenile child in that system.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) serves as the legislative cornerstone for Canada's juvenile justice system. Governments, police, attorneys, judges, and others are collaborating closely with communities and families across the nation to prevent youth crime and guarantee a just and efficient juvenile justice system. According to the Canadian Constitution, the administration of the criminal justice system is the provinces' and territories' responsibility. Although the federal government is in charge of criminal law, including legislation pertaining to youth justice, For many people, particularly young individuals, mistakes are common. The process of their growth and maturity could potentially lead them to make unthinking decisions at such

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Retrieved from https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/508315/COCE_113782_01_Dec_14.pdf. Cunneen, C., White, R., & Richards, K. (2013). Juvenile justice: youth and crime in australia. Retrieved from EBook Central.

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Should the Not Criminally Responsible Law Remain in Canada? As of 1992, the Canadian Criminal Justice system introduced a new Law to its Criminal Code. NCR stands for “Not Criminally Responsible.” It is defined in section 16 of the Criminal Code."

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

It is apparent in the United States that there should be certain boundaries for adolescents, which is why it is prohibited for them to engage in certain activities like drinking alcohol, being able to vote, and getting married. In essence, the author's point is that there are laws that prohibit youth from engaging in certain events, but these laws are not applicable when it comes to trying juveniles as adults. It is evident that society recognizes the difference between adults and juveniles. When it comes to the criminal justice system charging minors as adults, the laws regulating adolescents contradict each other. Juveniles should be treated consistently; situations should not modify

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

When kids that are only 16 and 17 are tried in adult court, studies have shown that these teens are more likely to commit crimes and serious offenses. For this reason some kids get into a cycle of trials, Juvy, and release because that is all they know how to do, because when they are released they don’t know how to live a normal life.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

We have seen today in society of how crime rates have been rampant and how statistics show that most of the crimes were being made by minors. I believe that when most of them look at the bottom of these young offenders come disproportionately from impoverished single-parent homes that are located in the neighbourhoods desinvertido and have high rates of learning disabilities, mental health, and substance abuse and problems with the help of the system of juvenile justice that can make a great return on a successful transition to adulthood. Their ages ranged from 20 and under, most are under fifteen years of age. Juveniles tried as adults must assume the same consequences as any other criminal and are subject to state prisons with inmates much higher and that have probably committed crimes much more tortuous then you could ever have. These minors between the ages of nine to twenty according to the offence committed or of the number of times that are prosecuted and believe that it is immutable.

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

There are many children in the world who are being put behind bars and detained for alleged wrongdoing without protections they are entitled to. Throughout the world, children are charged and sentenced for actions that should not be considered as adult crimes. Here in the United States, the minimum age of criminal responsibility is age 12. Law enforcement officials and those in the juvenile justice system nationwide tend to mistreat underage individuals by trying cases while working through the lens of an adult. Unfair punishments are still handed down domestically, which is in violation of Supreme Court law.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

# Lowering the Age of Criminal Responsibility in Australia to 14 The age of criminal responsibility in Australia is currently set at 10 years old, meaning that children as young as 10 can be charged with a crime and held responsible for their actions. However, there is a growing movement to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 14 years old. This essay will explore the reasons why the age of criminal responsibility in Australia should be lowered to 14 and provide evidence to support this argument. ## Developmental Understanding One of the reasons why the age of criminal responsibility in Australia should be lowered to 14 is that children at this age are capable of understanding the consequences of their actions.

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

Before the Youth Criminal Justice Act children in conflict with the law were treated similar to adult criminals, often receiving harsh sentences for relatively minor

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Criminal accountability refers to the responsibility taken for one 's actions when a crime is committed, these crimes may include sexual abuses, theft and murder. Accountability is intended to make sure every crime is taken under prosecution to maintain peace and equality in the country, however, the accountability of one that works within the UN body or with the government remains unclear due to many factors such as immunity, which exempts the criminal from being punished for the crimes they have committed. This is a major problem as it is biased and lacks justice to the violated victims, therefore, it must be taken under extreme deliberation in order to bring peace and exclude discrimination. Iraq has taken extreme care to amend and implement

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

Annotated bibliography Childress, S. (2016, June 2). More States Consider Raising the Age for Juvenile Crime. Retrieved from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/more-states-consider-raising-the-age-for-juvenile-crime/ More states are considering to raising the age for juvenile crimes before being tried as adult because young offender's mental capacity. The idea is to cut the cost of incarcerate young offender in adult prison and ensure offenders to receive proper education and specialized care to change their behavior. Putting children in adult prison does not deter crime.

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

If we look at the different criminal justice systems around the world, most countries have laws or regulations stating the “age of criminal responsibility” (Maher. G). However, there has been no clear international standard identified regarding the age at which criminal responsibility could be reasonably charged for a juvenile offender. The Convention on the Rights of Children (CRC) appeals parties to establish ‘a minimum age below which children shall be

Read More

More about Discuss The Nature And Scope Of The Legal Issue Of Criminal Responsibility

Related Topics

Open Document