ipl-logo

Discuss The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

1063 Words5 Pages

1.1 This report is written to examine the effects of capital punishment on the society as several issues has caused government and non-government organisation as well as societies around the globe to analyse the relationship between the two.

According to deathpenalty.procon.org (2008), the practice of killing people as punishment for serious crimes they have committed first started back in the “18th century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes”. Afterwards, capital punishment rapidly accelerated during the start of the 16th century and into the current century. (Death Penalty Information Center, n.d.) Death penalties were sentenced through such methods as crucifixion, drowning, …show more content…

However, it’s been argued the cost of capital punishment is more than putting a criminal through maximum sentence – life imprisonment and there is a possibility of making an irreversible mistake of executing an innocent person. (deathpenalty.procon.org, 2016)

Therefore, there is a need to further research as to whether capital punishment is a benefit or harm to society.

1.2 Objectives of the …show more content…

(2016).
Retrieved July 30, 2017, from http://deathpenalty.procon.org/ view.resource.php?resourceID=002000 it must not be forgotten that since only the worst criminals that have committed the most heinous crimes are sentenced. The only acceptable punishment for the wrongdoings they have committed can only be the severest punishment known to mankind – death penalty

These criminals deserved this punishment as what they have done is clearly unacceptable. The crimes in which was committed cannot be justified by any punishment other than death penalty.
Phillips, D. P. (1980). The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment:
New Evidence on an Old Controversy. American Journal of Sociology,86(1), 139-148. doi:10.1086/227206

According to Philips(1980), “ homicides decreased by 35.7% immediately following a publicized execution”. Other criminal activities other than homicide such as rape, treason, terrorism, etc. also drastically reduces when death penalty is practiced.

Capital punishment is proven to be effective as people fear death. It is instilled in them from birth within their DNA. Hence, when the consequence of death comes to mind, one would think twice before making a wrong

Show More
Related
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

Oshinsky did a remarkable job explaining the history of the death penalty in a clear and concise way. While the text was fairly short, he effectively provided his readers with well documented and relevant information on how controversial the death penalty has been throughout the past few centuries. He undertook an exceptionally important issue that many Americans do not know much about, or may have conflicting feelings

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

From a utilitarian perspective, the potential deterrent effect of capital punishment is questionable, as research has shown that it does not significantly reduce crime rates (Equal Justice Initiative, 2023). Instead, it perpetuates a cycle of violence and retribution that undermines the ultimate goal of

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will serve to show that capital punishment is not, in fact, ethically permissible. I will argue this by explaining the government’s duty to its people, and how capital punishment is indeed a violation of these prima facie duties. 1. The government has a duty to protect its people from harm (including murder, abuse of power, etc.). 2.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

Melissa Mossey Honors Ethics Dr. Farley Capital Punishment In this essay I will explain the views about capital punishment as expressed by Igor Primoratz, in “Justifying Legal Punishment,” and Stephen Nathanson, in “An Eye for an Eye?”. I will also assert and defend my point of view that capital punishment is wrong, citing several strong utilitarian and Kantian objections. Igor Primoratz discusses the concept of justice purely for the sake of justice. He believes that fair punishment involves depriving a criminal of the same value of which they have deprived their victims.

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

Generally, the public sought out the stern implementation of the death penalty. But contrary to this, the use of the death penalty,

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

Crime was so high and the crimes being done were so dangerous that in 1936 little less than 200 people were executed through the death penalty (“Historical Data.” Crime and Justice Atlas). These studies shocked the many that such a

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

To prove this thesis the subjects of the death penalties history, international neighbours who still use this form of capital punishment,

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many studies indicating both a positive and negative effect on the homicide count regarding executions. A study by Hashem Dezhbaksh, Paul H. Rubin, and Joanna M. Shepherd published in the Journal of Law and Economics in 2003 concluded that each execution deterred a rough estimate of 18 murders. While another study by Katherine Baicker and Sendhil Mullainathan published in the Journal of Political Economy in 2004 found no evidence supporting that conclusion. This debate in detail would require a whole other paper. Another argument is retribution.

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

Capital Punishment helps deterrence rates, and cost options for the future, and if the death penalty is inhumane, there will no longer be doubt on whether it is

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Punishments for severe crimes around the world have been a subject of debate for many years. Different countries have varying views on what punishments are too extreme. The legality of certain forms of punishment is continually evolving in today's age. With the determination of constitutionality, a complex and evolving issue there are many debates around what constitutes cruel and unusual punishments. Despite ongoing controversies and discussions, punishments for serious crimes, including capital punishment, remain legal in some countries and continue to be imposed.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 87(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1143970 This article was written by Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L. Akers. They both consulted experts on criminology and criminal behaviour to evaluate the effectiveness of the Death Penalty.

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More

More about Discuss The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

Related Topics

Open Document