ipl-logo

Electoral System Disadvantages

856 Words4 Pages

The principle of majority system is simple. After the votes were being casted and totaled, the candidates with the most votes or the party securing the most votes wins the election. But sometimes there are additional conditions applicable. Duverger’s Law showed that majoritarian systems were far more likely to create two-party systems than proportional systems which generated multi-party races (Duverger, 1959). One of the best things about majoritarian electoral process is the accountability of the government. It happens because the government elected from a majoritarian system of election is a single party government. So, there are no complications about who should be accountable to whom. But there are cons of majoritarian electoral system as well. Such as, in most cases there is a huge possibility that the smaller or ethnic group gets neglected because of the bigger groups with a huge number of followers. Besides, since there is only one winner, the votes that is secured by the other competitors count for nothing and are totally wasted. As a result the opinion of a huge number oe people is neglected as well as denied. There are mainly five varieties …show more content…

It uses single member constituency and the style of voting is candidate-centered. An important feature of this type of electoral system is that the constituencies are based on the size of the electorate. “The voter is presented with the names of the nominated candidates and votes by choosing one, and only one, of them. The winning candidate is simply the person who wins most votes; in theory he or she could be elected with two votes, if every other candidate only secured a single vote.” (Reynolds, Reilly and Ellis:2005, Chap:3, p.35) In this type of electoral system the candidates do not need a minimum amount of votes to win the election, nor do they need an absolute number votes in order to get

Open Document