ipl-logo

Discussion Of Plato's Claims In The Republic

957 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Government in ancient greece

true to this day. Having specific branches of governments that specialize in certain things. Not only in the U.S has this been true when expanding to all regions of the world it is evident that this has played apart
3.Aristotle refutes many of Plato's claims in the Republic.While refuting them he builds a stronger ideology that is used in modern politics.
4. The original text of Aristotle's Politics are limiting because the eight different books written as one may not be in the order of which he wrote them in. This limits the knowledge of Aristotle's thought process and connections within the text.
B. (Carnes, “Politics”) To endure, a democracy, like an oligarchy, needs both the rich and the poor. A democracy that destroys the well-off becomes unstable. Where the people have authority over the laws, demagogues tear …show more content…

Counter intuitive to what Plato says Gives a different perspective. What this is saying goes against what Socrates believes. As stated Socrates believed that the exclusion of the social classes would be envisioned in The Republic However Aristotle believes that the division of classes is what drives the government. Pre Socratic philosophers giving the earliest form of what turns out to be a modern form of republicans fighting for the difference in social classes and the Modern Democrats trying to stabilize the gap of social classes.
2. Can we argue that Aristotle is right when analyzing and understanding that they at the time were the superpower of the world so we are able to connect this to having experience in this realm of politics. So when analyzing the Ideology of Aristotle's politics it is understandable that this form of politics be continued seeming as it has had previous success.
3. Aristotle's quote on having the government everywhere in the state and allowing the constitution to be the government. Makes for the distribution of rules fair and evenly. By having a written set of formed rules allows for all citizens to follow

Show More
Related
96 Words | 1 Pages

The forth crime that was charged was, disbelief ‘in the gods of the city.’ This charge is a result from the first charge of being ‘a natural philosopher.’ He indeed did not believe in any of the Olympian deities. He may have gotten out of this one if he praised any god and paid tribute to them, but he did not. Because he didn’t, he had committed treason.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

In the seventh book of Plato's republic there are several important symbols that mean many different things. All these symbols are mostly from the descriptions of the cave in which it closely resembles a cinema. A cinema where people are shackled, forced to watch the images that are presented in front of them. They have no other alternative, their necks are shackled to forever watch these images. Images made of statues that cast a shadow from a ledge above moved by other people which I can only assume as their captors.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

In Book 1 of the republic, by Plato, we are introduced to two central figures in the argument of justice, Socrates and Thrasymachus. Thrasymachus claims that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates then asks if his understanding, that what is beneficial to the stronger is just and must be beneficial to the weaker people, to which Thrasymachus replies that no, this is not so. He explains that justice is that which obtains the advantage of the stronger.

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The final argument of Plato’s Phaedo was created to prove souls cannot perish. Plato does so by arguing how a soul cannot die nor cease to exist on the same fundamental grounds of how the number three can never be even. For the number three holds the essence of being odd, without being odd entirely. Similarly, a soul holds the essence of life through immortality, however the soul is not immortal itself and only participates in immortality, just as the number three participates in being odd. Additionally, an essence or form cannot admit to the opposite of itself just as small cannot be large simultaneously, and hot cannot be cold.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

Aristotle’s Politics shows Aristotle’s perspective towards anarchy. Though, the Aristotle does not explicitly suggest that anarchy is conflictual, his ideology implies that he is against anarchy. Aristotle notoriously defended slavery when he said, “there must be a union of natural rule and a subject, that both may be preserved. For he who can foresee with his mind is by nature intended to be the lord and the master, and he who can work with his body is a subject” (Aristotle 26).

Read More
217 Words | 1 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, there are many different attempts of construing justice. A series of definitions that happen to contradict the beliefs of others sends one man on a quest to find the true meaning of a just person. In this work, there are many obstacles that take place before an accurate perception of justice is created. In the beginning of Plato’s dialogue the nature of the question is constructed and by the end of the ninth book the realization that personal justice and justice within a city happen to contrast in a way that allows Socrates to successfully complete his pursuit. In the Republic, Plato yearns to acquire the knowledge of what it means to be a just person.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

Aristotle is another political thinker from 384 BCE-322BCE. The way he approached studying politics was different compared to many other politicians. Aristotle believed that members within the community, should be involved in making decisions. It did not matter on social classes because every individual in society is different and everyone has something different to contribute. By contributing, everyone could come together as one and share their ideas.

Read More
1355 Words | 6 Pages

What is justice? This is the crucial question that Plato attempts to answer in his dialogue, The Republic. He conjures up an allegory that justice can be found in a person, and a person can represent a city. Thus, his entire dialogue focuses on this ‘just’ city and the mechanics of how the city would operate. His dialogue covers a myriad of topics about justice in addition to the human soul, politics, goodness and truth.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

As we have established, if the primary role of the state is to secure and maintain the most possible happiness for the people, the surely an unjust state would not be a state capable of achieving this goal. Monarchies seem the ideal constitution to Aristotle because the virtue of the monarch is not diluted by the potentially selfish desires of others. However, this is also the least stable of the

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Aristotle believed that constitutions were used as ways to organize the citizens within a given city. However, Aristotle did not believe that citizenship was simply determined by the residence of an individual in a city. In fact, he thought that the citizenship of a person should be determined on the share that person plays within the administration of

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

Democracy- the best form of governance; is evidently disputed in modern day politics. The disagreement has been carried on for centuries, as seen in Plato 's Republic and Pericles Speeches. According to The Republic, democracy cannot be implemented as the common man lacks the in-depth knowledge of vital spheres of bureaucracy such as economics, military stratagem, international conditions, and the niceties of law. However, this form of governance is viewed in a much more favorable light by Pericles in Thucydides ' History of the Peloponnesian Wars. He believes democracy is all beneficial to every sector of society and should be run for the general well-being, serving the ultimate goal of equality in justice.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

He justifies the need for democracy, aristocracy and monarchy depending on location. The three philosophers use their judgment and prior knowledge on each other’s work to validate an ideal society, especially for the uprising continent of America. Governments are an established institution in every society. Though there are multiple types of governments, their purpose is fundamental to determining the influence on a civilization.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Aristotle thought the best form of government was a polity or constitutional government; however, a polity was non-existent in Aristotle’s time. Correspondingly, Locke

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.

Read More
1333 Words | 6 Pages

Only those who are born with true philosophical understanding can rule. In the Second Treatise by John Locke, Locke addresses the state of nature, which is essentially equality and freedom. Even though people have liberty, they still need to obey natural laws. On the contrary of Plato’s just city, Locke believes that absolute authority is not a civil government. A civil society is where the majority rules.

Read More

More about Discussion Of Plato's Claims In The Republic

Related Topics

Open Document