This experiment used the process of DNA fingerprinting to determine which suspect committed a specific crime. Although the results were null due to lab time expiring, the lab TA gave the information out that suspect 3 committed the crime. This is due to his/her DNA fragments matching that of the DNA found at the crime scene more than the other two suspects that were tested. Introduction: This experiment was carried out to determine which of three suspects committed a crime by using the processes of DNA fingerprinting. There are two stages of DNA fingerprinting, the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and the treatment of restriction enzymes (Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) (Theory) : Molecular Biology Virtual Lab II : Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering : Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Virtual Lab). PCR can amplify a single or several fragments of DNA which is significant because if the piece of DNA is too long, it is not able to be used in this lab. Restriction enzymes help compare DNA between suspects by cutting its palindromic …show more content…
With that being said, their DNA fragments that were created from the restriction enzyme used, had to be a match. I hypothesized that suspect 3 would be a match which was supported by the results given by the lab TA. What should have happened in this lab was effected by the time limit given. If there was more time or if we had begun sooner, the results would have been easier to explain. The significance of this experiment was to show how DNA fingerprinting is essential to forensic science. In 2014, DNA fingerprinting helped put a man in Iowa behind bars 40 years after the murder happened by matching blood found on the victim’s blanket to that of her killer’s blood that was found in the national felons’ DNA database (Bovsun,