Question Presented: Whether President Doe’s executive order, on the newly annexed island to Florida, violates any Constitutional Amendments, which should be granted to the occupiers of said island under the Constitution of the United States of America.
Brief Answer: Yes, President Doe’s executive order, with its 13 provisions, violated the Constitutional Amendments granted to the occupiers of the newly annexed island to Florida. Florida has jurisdiction over the island, and therefore, the occupiers of the island have to follow Florida laws.
Facts:
After invading and subsequently occupying the island newly annexed to Florida, President Doe enacted an executive order that violated the Shiners
Discussion:
Because of the following the court should not honor the Presidents executive order.
Constitution article 2 section 3 states, “he shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed,” meaning that the
…show more content…
This is a violation of the 6th Constitutional Amendment, which states, “the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” U.S. Const. amend. VI. Provision 8 states that Shiner’s are not entitled to bail. Shiners may be executed by stabbing chair, drowning, or stoning by coconut. This is a violation of the 8th Constitutional Amendment, which states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” U.S. Const. amend.