Does Henry David Thoreau Servant Or Observant?

472 Words2 Pages

According to Henry David Thoreau nature is a man’s company. Through solitude, he claims that people do not look at their surroundings. Being very observant can give us an advantage to what nature offers us. In society, solitude can serve as a learning experience and change the way people act with one another. Henry David Thoreau spent time alone in his cabin out in the wilderness, and began to realize a few things that we humans are careless about. Thoreau was against being together in a community, so he rapidly began to create a great literary masterpiece that stated how people are the reason of many of the problems today. The justification of Thoreau deciding to be isolated from everyone else was because he thinks that “We are in each other 's way.” When we stumble with one another we start arguments; greater arguments can cause fights, and small fights can lead to the spark of a great war. David Thoreau explains to us how when we argue we begin to “Lose respect” with one another, so he proposes to us that the solution to our problems with each other is simply to be …show more content…

Every time that a group project is assigned I look everywhere in search of hardworking people, but unfortunately this is rare nowadays. I personally do not like working with a group of people, it is a waste of our time for a number of reasons. People are more dependent on one another and expect the job to be done for them without even trying. This affects the way we are now, things are not supposed to be easy and just magically be solved; it defeats the purpose of working together with each other and learning. I agree that more people can serve as a power source for more research, but it still isn’t sufficient enough for those who just act like fools and don’t get their work done; the one’s that are goofing around can distract the rest of the group members and convince them to join the dark