ipl-logo

Domestic Surveillance Pros And Cons

1370 Words6 Pages

Domestic Surveillance does have its opponents though. Those against it argue how costly the program is, with it costing on average $574 per United States taxpayer every year, which far exceeds the government's estimates of it costing only $35 billion dollars. “After good estimates about 14% of the country's total intelligence budget -- or about $10 billion -- goes to the NSA” (What the NSA costs taxpayers). Not only does it prove cost ineffective, but the government does not show the public the results of Domestic Surveillance, giving only vague numbers as to how they stop terrorist and domestic threats. Those against Domestic Surveillance bring up the point that it infringes on our constitutional right of privacy, saying that the government sifting through vast amounts of metadata is breaking the amendment, making Domestic Surveillance unconstitutional. This is the main argument that people use against Domestic Surveillance, believing that this infringement upon their privacy is more important than stopping …show more content…

Our country has suffered through terrorism and fraudulent attempts/acts due to not having a strict system of surveillance. Unfortunately, terrorism and fraud are definitely issues that will never go away, but could be oppressed with the right precautions and procedures. A nation needs to collect, process, and store citizen data to ensure the safety of its citizens for the betterment of the nation. By not storing citizen data, it miserably puts the country in a vulnerable position. It is not possible to store citizen data without keeping an eye on the citizens. With the information found and retrieved by the NSA’s Domestic Surveillance program, other Bureaus will be able find and fix different problems and situations in our country. Not to mention, there will be job openings available for people of unemployment. All together, Domestic Surveillance makes our entire country

Show More
Related
150 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment makes people in American feel safe and secure. David Sirota author of “Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?” says,"a few years after it aired the director of national Intelligence admitted illegal surveillance was still taking place"(understand). " the Government’s unverified assertion that it has halted “systemic” illegal/unconstitutional surveillance by the National Security Administration." says David Sirota author of “Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?”(Understand). Sirota also states "The NSA is admitting that even with an outdated 1997 supreme court ruling it knows it cannot post mass collect metadata with no warrants whatsoever.

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

Edward Snowden perfectly sums up the thought process behind the rejection of the mass surveillance: “Privacy isn’t about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect… freedom of speech doesn’t mean much if you can’t have a quiet space… arguing that you don’t have privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” (Document 2). The point of view is from an ardent Libertarian that has contributed to Ron Paul’s campaign numerous times. Edward Snowden firmly believes in the right to self.

Read More
2274 Words | 10 Pages

The surveillance reflects the constitution and the social contract the government has with its citizens. The source of the surveillance is the law and the

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More
1197 Words | 5 Pages

The NSA spying at one time used to be economically beneficial but as time passed the economy of the NSA has decreased while the price of the NSA

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

The other side of this argument is that mass surveillance is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This is what Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy had to say on the matter. “’Americans deserve to understand more about the NSA's collection and use of their phone records, and in particular about the types of systemic problems revealed in these documents,’”(Risen 4). In a similar way according to Risen “the American public remains wary of the threat of terrorism but is also critical of government surveillance programs put in place”, and that “majority of Americans ‘oppose mass surveillance of people's Internet and phone usage for use in future investigations. ’“(Risen 6).

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Some Americans believe that the Patriot Act is a violation of privacy, but the government takes crucial steps to ensure the privacy of all law-abiding Americans. Despite contrary beliefs, the

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, NSA’s digital surveillance shouldn’t be continued for following reasons. First, it’s against of laws and constitution. Retrieving information from digital space is considered as unreasonable searches, therefore it violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects all U.S citizens from unreasonable searches. It’s not legal either.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

The NSA or the National Security Agency carries out most of the domestic surveillance in the United States. Before the 9/11 attacks the NSA needed approval from a court, but after the attacks, they were given free reign to copy any data that possibly linked to terrorist activities. This led to many arguments over whether this collection of data was unconstitutional or not. The extent of this surveillance shocked many people; many civil rights advocates thought that this surveillance breached United States citizens’ rights. Because of the threat of domestic surveillance in the United States it should be decreased drastically but not entirely stopped.

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

In 2008, President Bush signed into law The FISA Amendment Act, an act which allowed the government to monitor Americans’ electronic devices. Bush claimed that this Act could help save lives, as mentioned before, but what he did not mention is that this allows the government to conduct surveillance without probable cause. (“How the NSA’s Surveillance Procedures Threaten Americans’ Privacy.”) When people heard about this, they became concerned, and many began to question if the NSA would abuse this power.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

You shouldn’t have to be watched if you aren’t deemed a threat to yourself or society. In my opinion humans are naturally more private creatures that don’t like sharing everything about themselves. The individual right of privacy allows humans to hide somethings about themselves, if it doesn’t seem harmful. However, surveillance is used in public order to observe those that could be plotting against the government, or an attack in the United States. Surveillance has been used to catch and stop many dangerous people who show a threat to the safety of the United States.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Surveillance is becoming increasingly integrated into human lives. Seemingly inconsequential minutiae like how long one spends in line at a grocery store or how many times a headline is clicked on a social media site are collected automatically by both public and private institutions. Whatever we do and wherever we go, there is likely some trace of it. This has led to great debates about the right to privacy, how much surveillance is too much, and under what circumstances surveillance is justifiable. Film and Television play important roles in these debates and in the way in which the public conceptualizes the utility and threat of surveillance more generally.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

Once information enters the online data bases, it is impossible to erase. The data can be used in court to draw incorrect conclusions and put someone in prison for good. The U.S. government does keep tabs on its citizens. John Simpson, a privacy project director says, “I don’t really want to live in a total surveillance state where big brother knows everything I do and has all that information at its fingertips.” Edward Snowden released this information out of concern because he thought it was dangerous.

Read More
1315 Words | 6 Pages

(Bilton, 2013) Surveillance of search engines permits information to be monitored so that if any hazardous search word like how to make bomb is looked it up several times by someone then it can be identified (Anon, 2014). Also, watching over the public assists police to capture crime suspects so that government organizations can protect national security (mass surveillance 위키피디아) To be specific, after terrible incident occurred in September 11, 2001, government of United States enacted the Patriot Act which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. The act was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in the name of declaring war with terrorism. (위키피디아) The law grants the right to Federal Bureau of Investigation to profile people who fit certain stereotypes so that potential crime and potential terror can be prevented.

Read More
853 Words | 4 Pages

However, in the 21st century surveillance is used in different and very complicated ways. So many crimes and terrorist attacks forced governments around the world to use electronic surveillance to protect their own people. This electronic surveillance is very complicated. You don’t even know it’s happening and you are the

Read More

More about Domestic Surveillance Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document