Domestic Terrorism: Dahmer Vs. Manson

1577 Words7 Pages

Domestic terrorism has always been apart of American culture even in fiction and in reality societies. For example Charles Manson and Jeffrey Dahmer were serial killers known for their cruel actions of domestic terrorism. Jeffrey Dahmer is known for the murder of 17 men from 1978 to 1991. Charles Manson was the leader of a cult group called the Manson Family which caught national attention when the group killed actress Sharon Tate and six other people. It is a universal fact that Manson and Dahmer were not mentally stable. In the novel, Project Mayhem can be compared to the Manson Family of the 1960s. Project Mayhem first began with a group of white collar workers who never fought publically for any reason, so they started a club called Fight …show more content…

In the article Insomnia - Symptoms & Cause it states that if someone is aggressive it could be a sign of insomnia. This would help how to detect people with insomnia before they cause harm to anyone. If they are aggressive towards somebody the person would know not to take it deeply. Im I sleeping or did I even sleep? I have Insomnia (Palahniuk). This a clear sign of insomnia if you do not know if your sleeping or awake this could cause a lot of chaos. People with insomnia would do things thinking they are in a dream but in fact it is in the real world. This could cause a lot of conflict in everyday situations and cause a lot of harm to people. Another way to help with insomnia is by ”Suffering insomnia, the Narrator attempts to find relief by participating in support groups for cancer survivors and the terminally ill, where the instability and suffering he witnesses dispel his own alienation(Burgess).” Support groups helps you to deal with your problems even though you all dont have the same mental or physical impairment. It gives you a safe environment to express who you are and how insomnia affects you in everyday things. It is hard for people with insomnia to express how they feel ”In the same way as the narrator acts firmly within the zone of emotion--or the lack thereof, as when he explains that his