ipl-logo

Donald Trump's Affecting The Upper Class

867 Words4 Pages

New Presidents like to change things in America. For instance, President-elect Donald Trump has many things he wants to change. For the most part, Trump's plans help the upper class more than any other class in the United States. There are some positives and negatives on how it affects the upper class. One positive being more money in their pockets. A negative is taking away some of their money. Some of the things Trump wants to change to achieve this include: taxes, education, environmental awareness, and many more. Donald Trump wants to lower taxes and in doing this he is benefiting the upper class. Income tax for the poor will come down to 21%. Income tax for the middle class would come down 25%, but finally income tax for the upper …show more content…

manufacturers via higher prices that American families and businesses would have to pay for these domestic producers’ goods. Which means,” a 10 to 15% tax on these goods translate to $1,100 to $1,650 per year “(Lincicome). This affects the upper class because instead of spending the money on investments, healthcare, or housing they would have to spend it on manufactured goods. In this case it affects the upper class …show more content…

If we get rid of the common core than students wouldn't be able to work harder to get their answers/solutions. We wouldn’t have students taking the extra mile to get their answers. It would be hard to get more people in the upper class because they wouldn’t be used to working extra hard to get to where they want. They wouldn’t work hard to build businesses or to earn money. Therefore this would affect the upper class negatively because it would drop dramatically. Trump has another plan about education. It is that,”He has come up with a $20 billion plan aimed at expanding charter and private school options for low-income students”(Gurney). The real question is where this money is coming from. Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation thinks Trump could bankroll this plan at the expense of Title 1 funds. Title 1 is,” Federal dollars for low-income public schools”(Gurney). This affects the upper class because let's just say if their child went to a public school than they would not have the resources as kids in a private school. It affects the upper class negatively because they would have to enroll their child in a private school, therefore spending more

Show More
Related
662 Words | 3 Pages

Within the reading of chapter four of Our Kids by Robert Putnam one key point of his argument is that it really matters where kids attend school and who they are attending school with. The overall growing class gap is extremely evident within the American school system. However, schools are not responsible for the creation of the opportunity gap because the gap already exists before schools are put into the picture. While this may be true, the schools that kids from affluent families are attending are significantly different than schools that children from poorer families are attending. This could be a product of the fact that affluent and poor families are usually not living in the same areas.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

In Scott Kings’ speech he perfectly describes the negative effects of Reaganomics. The effect that it had on low income families was not the only consequence. The national debt increased by 188%, which is something that continues to affect the United States (ProCon.org 1981-2009). Though there was a change in American economics, the only ones that truly profited from Reaganomics were the rich. The people in low income homes were either negatively impacted or their quality of life stays the same.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

If a family is able to afford to do so, they have the option to send their child to a private school to ensure a good education. Also, these parents may choose to send their child to a private school, knowing that there is less diversity of race there. This would keep their children segregated from children of other

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

The first positive was that every American can afford more luxuries. This is because, as Andrew Carnegie in Document 1 put it, “Today the world obtains goods of excellent quality at prices which even the last generation would have thought unbelievable.” The effect of this was that poor people

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Positive aspects in the new administration brought was Social Security Act it improved the economic statues in America. In this time, it also brought some part of country out of poverty Other positive perspective that happen was Works Process Administration was able to bring citizens back to work after the Great Depression. It also gave name the America’s Federal Government it was one biggest employer at this time. This brought long the American Dream aspect that nation talks about. Yes, the expansion had some positive notions to address by building up the American economy and giving back social setting into

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

The American people may come to appreciate his achievement even more than they did in the elections of 1984 and 1988 (The Rich, the Poor, and Reaganomics, par

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

Franklin Roosevelt and Donald Trump, two of the most prolific presidents in history, with the latter only three months into his term, have numerous comparisons. The only barriers that separate their greatness is that of age, party troth, and responsibilities. Roosevelt was a facilitator of change who spurred great economic growth during one of the worst economic slumps in America’s history. Trump is an assertive leader who has issues to deal with that are of a similar magnitude to Roosevelt’s but slightly dissimilar conditions. However, regardless of their sameness, or any lack thereof, they are virtually indistinguishable and thereupon have identical inaugural addresses.

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

He started the New Deal program, which helped the economy greatly. He wanted to find jobs for everyone, so the unemployment rate would go down. One of the programs was the Social Security Act. This helped elderly people who were no longer able to work, but still needed an income to pay bills. This helps relieve people from financial distress.

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

In particular, Lyndon B. Johnson’s presidency overall was a good thing for the American People. “Johnson was a man with great political skills, and it was through him that the nation made its most significant attempt to expand the American welfare state.” In fact, Johnson himself grew up poor from Texas. Therefore, making him more ambitious to expand education and end poverty.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

Common Core is detrimental to the development of young minds as well as their well being. This

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

The schools that are located in higher socioeconomic areas obtain much greater funding due to the parents earning more and therefore being able to fund the school better. In today's society, the leading cause for not obtaining a higher education is the cost of education and therefore Americans who have better upbringings usually receive the best education there is to offer and often choose to seek higher education because they are able to. The effects that are reflected from these financial variations between people of higher socioeconomic backgrounds and ones of people who are not as financially well off inevitably build barriers for the individuals who endure lower education. Not growing up with financial freedom and therefore not being able to afford college has a large impact on the individual's life as an adult. These individuals who are not able to receive higher education are left with low-paying jobs and health issues caused by overworking their bodies and not having the

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

The upper-class parents don't have to worry as much about money. David Brooks writes, "Over the last 40 years upper-income parents have increased the amount they spend on their kids' enrichment activities, like tutoring and extracurriculars, by $5,300 a year" (119). The upper-class parents spend more money on their children because they have the resources to do so. The lower-class parents don’t have the resources because they have jobs that don’t pay as much as the upper-class. So the money that they earn has to go to things that they can't go without, such as utility bills, groceries, gas, medical bills, car insurance, taxes, and more.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Rent Seeking occurs when a company, organization or an individual spend their own wealth on political lobbying to obtain economic gains which are beneficial to none apart from themselves. The distinguishing features of Rent Seeking activities are: • Influences government policies to the benefit of the rent seeker • Discourages productivity in the economy • Just involves redistribution of surplus from one party to other i.e. no creation of wealth • Negative Sum Game: Real GDP falls as no creation of value + administrative costs to the government which is an added expense Rent Seeking has several unfavourable implications. Some of them are: • Income Inequality: Surpluses of the weaker sections of the society are transferred to the stronger sections • Lower efficiency: Greater incentives to rent-seek and being profitable rather than being more productive and profitable. • Reduced Competitiveness: leads to high prices due to monopoly power of suppliers

Read More
279 Words | 2 Pages

What is Pathos? An emotional appeal persuaded by the author, producer and write to its audience. It is often used in everything we read, hear, and feel in a movie, in a song, in a book, and on television. This commercial is an example of how pathos is used from the beginning to the end.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

School funding is also based on the school population size. Why should newer schools with high income students get to have a lot more resources then the other schools with low income students. Why is it that lower income schools aren’t given the same resources to help the students? These students with low income do have the same opportunity as the higher income new schools. A lot of those students don’t have access to internet or even have a ride for transportation.

Read More

More about Donald Trump's Affecting The Upper Class

Related Topics

Open Document