Clearly, Lizzie received a copious amount of support from the media and indirectly acquired support from the judicial system. From the beginning, the court was favorably imbalanced for Lizzie. Her future rested solely in the hands of white, educated men. During the 19th century, these types of men’s beliefs largely mirrored the Cult of True Womanhood, defined by Barbra Welter.
In the court case of Tempel Anneke, many social and economic factor determined the outcome of her trial. Was it the misfortune of the people in her community that she was unable to help, or the fact that she was known to be a very powerful healer? Could it also have been that she was not part of the norm of society based on her characteristics of the general woman figure she portrayed in the 1600’s? Through the analysis of, The Trial of Tempel Anneke: Records of a Witchcraft Trial in Brunswick, Germany, 1663’s court transcriptions the details will show how these social and economic factors played such an important part in the trial that convicted her to death.
Clark argues that the sisters in the Ursuline convent broke traditional roles that had once been attributed to a male position. Clark’s argument is upheld well throughout the entirety of her book, and brings forth new ideas about women’s role in the church throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century in society. Her bibliography contains a variety of sources which support her thesis, and displays the wide selection she chose from to create
Very few hands in this village are clean of sin, but none have transgressed so greatly as to warrant a noose. While I cannot say that those you have condemned are all of pure and virtuous standing, they are at least guiltless of the transgressions you have placed upon their heads. A great number of clean-handed men and women will hang at your word already, there is no need to increase such a multitude of unlucky souls. If you have quarrel with any, let it be myself; not with Elizabeth, and not with the people of
In one of his more popular ‘‘home-talks’’ to the regular eight o’clock nightly gathering in the Mansion House at Oneida, entitled ‘‘Liberty,’’ John Humphrey Noyes challenged the notion that freedom was a natural right of human beings. He found absurd the idea that any ‘‘sinner’’ was deserving of liberty, arguing that ‘‘perfect liberty,’’ entrance to ‘‘heaven itself,’’ could only be achieved by a select group, those who had their hearts ‘‘purged of all selfishness by Christ.’’ . The founder of Oneida was John Humphrey Noyes. His early years suggested eccentricity, if not total nonconformity. He was born in Brattleboro, Vermont, in 1811.
Twyla Wells-Wetherbee: Twyla is a 13 year old girl with blondish brownish hair and pretty blue eyes that sparkled and shine like an million sapphires. Twyla goes to the Ravenwood Institute of the Fine Arts and Sciences. Twyla excels at creative writing and calligraphy. Twyla finds out in her creative reading class about her powers of writing.
The journalist argues that even though the entire society wasn’t satisfied by his religious ruling, people should still appreciate the peace and resources that he provided to the needy people. With so much knowledge about Christianity and being devoted, Jacob provides a strong perspective about Charles’ religious life because he is very religious himself as he explains praying to the Holy Rosary has made him appreciate the kind acts that Charles has shown as the Count of Flanders. Moreover, White provides a lot of evidences by using quotes in the Holy Rosary that supports why Charles refers to Holy Scriptures while ruling Flanders. Throughout this article, I found White’s analysis of Count Charles’ religious life really useful because he provides good examples of why religion has made a big impact to governing a society and how religion can change people’s perspective into believing certain
Charlie Presti HST-201-02 28 October 2016 Anne Hutchinson Anne Hutchinson was vocal about what she believed in, and no one or thing was going to stop her. “A Radically Different Voice: Gender and Language in the Trials of Anne Hutchinson”, captures the struggles and conflict of Anne Hutchinson in the 1630’s. This article was written by Lad Tobin who focuses on gender differences and roles and how language was used and interpreted between men and women (1). An analysis of Anne Hutchinson 's trials over expressing her opinion and beliefs to the most powerful ministers starts making people think twice about their role as a male or female and how their language is communicated to a listener.
Gender roles played a heavy role in colonial society, and the women who did not conform to these roles were easy targets for witchcraft accusations. Women who were post-menopausal, widowed, unmarried were not fulling their “duty” to society of bearing children and thus could come under fire (Lecture.) Those who were aggressive, out spoken, or did not do as another wished could also bring cries of “witch!” (Lecture.) This is highlighted in Cotton Mather’s Accounts of the Salem Witchcraft Trials, one of these accused women Susana Martin stands trial with many of the testifiers being men who had been wronged by Martin in some way or another.
The second part looks more closely at particular regions in the Early Modern World, and the way ideas from different institutions cause different effects. The areas covered as aforementioned; it could be considered that the way in which Wiesner-Hanks sets out her chapters provides clear outline of the way in which she historically contextualises the global scope. It is the way in which Merry Wiesner-Hanks uses vast geographical and historical context to structuralise her findings, which sets her book apart from others of the same variety. However, it could also be considered that this is one of the few criticisms of the book, as in order to provide a more in depth view of the world beyond Europe in the Early Modern World, Wiesner-Hanks is observed to generalise beliefs across mass geographical regions and the religious views that those within the country might have. Moreover, it is evident that Wiesner-Hanks develops the ideas of Michael Foucault, it terms of the belief that sexuality is paired with power, which ultimately is paired with the knowledge of ‘The will to know’ (book of reference,
Thomas(ine) Hall, an English servant brought to trial for alternating between male and female clothing and mannerisms in 1629 caused much public controversy. During this time, gender is a strict binary in place to aid social order. A society accustomed to policing its people, the idea that men have sex with women and all other types of sex are sinful is heavily imposed. Therefore, without modern medicine to biologically determine one’s sex, markers such as clothing and mannerisms mattered to identify which gender category a person belonged to. Thus, when faced with a person who does not follow this binary it created a crisis as to whom this person has sex with, generating a sense of need to protect others from Thomas(ine)’s mysterious sex.
When making decisions regarding who to choose as our next elected officials, one of the first qualities we scrutinize is their judgment, using our own judgment to do so. However, in a nonsecular society in which judgment of a religious authority is essentially the judgment of a divine power, there is significantly less room for scrutiny. The authority of any figure with political power stems from the judgment of the community over which it rules. For instance, if the community believes in the absolute authority of God, then the judgment of God is what gives the judgment of the church or any religious leader authority. A large aspect of the authority that made the Catholic Church such a prominent religious and political force during the early 16th century was called into question by Martin Luther.
Women in England during the 1800s faced restrictions to participate in movements and were limited in their political speaking and voting capabilities. Although many women accepted their fate, some fought for a different social role. (“The Women 's Rights Movement”) Women such Mary Wollstonecraft, Jane Austen, and Mary Shelley inspired a new way of radical thinking towards human rights, specifically the rights of women (Surgis). Thanks to these inspiring individuals, there was a change in women’s attitude regarding their options to become part of the work force, gain an education, and have equal rights in marriage (Surgis).
Dorothy took her early pain and suffering and channeled it into her literature for the rest of her life. When she was not writing poetry and short stories, she wrote book and drama reviews for Vanity Fair and The New Yorker. She wrote with a clever brand of humor known as wit. Not one to hide behind pleasantries, she was a derisive critic and a member of the Algonquin Round Table: a group of literary notables in the 1920s and 1930s. They were called the "Vicious Circle" because of their scathing reviews.
The women in the Anglo-Saxon period surprisingly enjoyed more rights than our great-great grandparents. Women in the 21 st century enjoy equal rights to men, the same goes for the Anglo-Saxon period. Women’s legal rights, during King Alfred’s reign for example’s sake, were higher than the times or eras to follow. Why? King Alfred had many laws just on women’s rights, protecting their “sides”.
